57 replies to this topic

[betacentauri]

Your own build image?
make update
MACHINE=... make image

Or what do you mean?

[dax]

Your own build image?
make update
MACHINE=... make image

Or what do you mean?

Yes, my own image, thanks again.

[janejak]

git pull
git submodule update && git submodule init

an run the build again...

 

when i start to run building i get some warning:

NOTE: glibc can't be built with -Os, -Os -Wno-error will be used instead.################                                                                         | ETA:  00:01:58
NOTE: glibc can't be built with -Os, -Os -Wno-error will be used instead.
WARNING: Unable to get checksum for splash-bootlogo SRC_URI entry vuduo2_splash.bmp: file could not be found###############################################       | ETA:  00:00:11
WARNING: Unable to get checksum for splash-bootlogo SRC_URI entry vuduo2_splash1.bmp: file could not be found
WARNING: Unable to get checksum for splash-bootlogo SRC_URI entry vuduo2_splash2.bmp: file could not be found
WARNING: Unable to get checksum for splash-bootlogo SRC_URI entry vuduo2_splash3.bmp: file could not be found
 

[Erik Slagter]

That's normal.

[janejak]

this time error:

| /bin/sh: /home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/glib-2.46.1/tests/gobject/testmarshal.list: Permission denied
| Makefile:1737: recipe for target 'stamp-testmarshal.h' failed
| make[4]: [stamp-testmarshal.h] Error 126 (ignored)
| (echo "#include \"testmarshal.h\"";  --prefix=test_marshal /home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/glib-2.46.1/tests/gobject/testmarshal.list --body) >> xgen-gmc \
| && cp xgen-gmc testmarshal.c \
| && rm -f xgen-gmc xgen-gmc~
| /bin/sh: --prefix=test_marshal: command not found
| Makefile:1742: recipe for target 'testmarshal.c' failed
| make[4]: *** [testmarshal.c] Error 127
| make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/build/tests/gobject'
| Makefile:1634: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
| make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/build/tests'
| Makefile:1137: recipe for target 'all' failed
| make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
| make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/build/tests'
| Makefile:1204: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
| make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/build'
| Makefile:846: recipe for target 'all' failed
| make: *** [all] Error 2
| ERROR: oe_runmake failed
| ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (log file is located at /home/jan-egil/openpli-next/build/tmp/work/mips32el-oe-linux/glib-2.0/1_2.46.1-r0/temp/log.do_compile.8626)
ERROR: Task 1835 (/home/jan-egil/openpli-next/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_2.46.1.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1'
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 769 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.
Waiting for 0 running tasks to finish:

Summary: 1 task failed:
  /home/jan-egil/openpli-next/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_2.46.1.bb, do_compile
Summary: There were 5 WARNING messages shown.
Summary: There were 2 ERROR messages shown, returning a non-zero exit code.
Makefile:82: recipe for target 'image' failed
make: *** [image] Error 1
 

Attached Files

•  log.do_compile.8626.log   821.75KB   1 downloads

[blzr]

oops, I mistakenly swapped submodule commands, sorry...
should be the other way around, init, then update

alternatively:

git submodule update --init

hope this helps

[janejak]

no still error

Attached Files

•  log.do_compile.3669.log   18KB   2 downloads

[athoik]

no still error

Maybe remove build/tmp folder and try again?

Edited by athoik, 18 January 2016 - 16:55.

[blzr]

strange, exactly this bug has been fixed upstream few days ago:

http://patchwork.ope...g/patch/112083/

and this fix should be included in master-next yesterday's oe update...

 

@janejak, could you please check if your openembedded-core HEAD is at b3b679d5be86f73d1a06c7230cb00872f0a407b5 ?

Edited by blzr, 18 January 2016 - 17:21.

[janejak]

strange, exactly this bug has been fixed upstream few days ago:

http://patchwork.ope...g/patch/112083/

and this fix should be included in master-next yesterday's oe update...

 

@janejak, could you please check if your openembedded-core HEAD is at b3b679d5be86f73d1a06c7230cb00872f0a407b5 ?

just started agen now to try to build

Cloning into 'openembedded-core'...
remote: Counting objects: 236726, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (62923/62923), done.
remote: Total 236726 (delta 169190), reused 236635 (delta 169120)
Receiving objects: 100% (236726/236726), 88.95 MiB | 409.00 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (169190/169190), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
Submodule path 'openembedded-core': checked out 'b3b679d5be86f73d1a06c7230cb00872f0a407b5'
 

 

Parsing recipes: 100% |###########################################################################################################################################| Time: 00:04:16
Parsing of 2187 .bb files complete (0 cached, 2187 parsed). 2732 targets, 421 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.28.0"
BUILD_SYS         = "x86_64-linux"
NATIVELSBSTRING   = "Ubuntu-15.10"
TARGET_SYS        = "mipsel-oe-linux"
MACHINE           = "vuduo2"
DISTRO            = "openpli"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "5"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "o32 fpu-hard mips32"
TARGET_FPU        = ""
meta-oe           
meta-filesystems  
meta-multimedia   
meta-networking   
meta-python       = "HEAD:5ec0bd998e6fe4d7bf5f7ca30c431447adf5e8b5"
meta              = "HEAD:b3b679d5be86f73d1a06c7230cb00872f0a407b5"
meta-openpli      
meta-dream        = "master-next:e7d7e88fb532f52835f9fb4cd987ae51b7692252"
meta-vuplus       = "HEAD:5ceccaab8866116710d0facd022f9d3442d5b0db"
meta-xsarius      = "HEAD:a1bfb0e60f360966cf1416d299d9d44dd8153f4c"
meta-xp           = "HEAD:38ba4aea0e8c2e391e90a845ab77b30d35ed5e95"
meta-xtrend       = "HEAD:e693c6de6559674f16cf740af43e6fc1d12df061"
meta-formuler     = "HEAD:9342cafea3955cc29edcf8bb06b60d703929cb58"
meta-hd           = "HEAD:29c7a9a8e20baac81b479c10c4081aaff389dd3f"
meta-local        = "master-next:e7d7e88fb532f52835f9fb4cd987ae51b7692252"

NOTE: Preparing RunQueue
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
 

Edited by janejak, 19 January 2016 - 01:42.

[janejak]

atlast i get it to work but i get som warings:

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.28.0"
BUILD_SYS         = "x86_64-linux"
NATIVELSBSTRING   = "Ubuntu-15.10"
TARGET_SYS        = "mipsel-oe-linux"
MACHINE           = "vuduo2"
DISTRO            = "openpli"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "5"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "o32 fpu-hard mips32"
TARGET_FPU        = ""
meta-oe           
meta-filesystems  
meta-multimedia   
meta-networking   
meta-python       = "HEAD:5ec0bd998e6fe4d7bf5f7ca30c431447adf5e8b5"
meta              = "HEAD:b3b679d5be86f73d1a06c7230cb00872f0a407b5"
meta-openpli      
meta-dream        = "master-next:6fe542c4b3bbe996fa3a81c199929d3e298e4400"
meta-vuplus       = "HEAD:5ceccaab8866116710d0facd022f9d3442d5b0db"
meta-xsarius      = "HEAD:7f55a522372eb5a7428a458d5a784b43ed2cfce6"
meta-xp           = "HEAD:38ba4aea0e8c2e391e90a845ab77b30d35ed5e95"
meta-xtrend       = "HEAD:66fbc589b76314e10e688dcb2207142afe3b9df1"
meta-formuler     = "HEAD:369090519128917d375713818aaa0a542ba162c1"
meta-hd           = "HEAD:321440ee26ea4f4e11cf9587bb955ae4317e1a2b"
meta-local        = "master-next:6fe542c4b3bbe996fa3a81c199929d3e298e4400"

NOTE: Preparing RunQueue
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
WARNING: Failed to fetch URL http://www.openssl.o...l-1.0.2e.tar.gz, attempting MIRRORS if available
WARNING: linux-vuduo2: No generic license file exists for: GPL in any provider
WARNING: QA Issue: linux-vuduo2: Files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:
  /tmp/vmlinux-3.13.5
Please set FILES such that these items are packaged. Alternatively if they are unneeded, avoid installing them or delete them within do_install.
linux-vuduo2: 1 installed and not shipped files. [installed-vs-shipped]
WARNING: Failed to fetch URL http://jerakeen.org/...ap-0.7.1.tar.gz, attempting MIRRORS if available
WARNING: Failed to fetch URL http://downloads.sou...se-2.9.4.tar.gz, attempting MIRRORS if available
WARNING: QA Issue: gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad: configure was passed unrecognised options: --disable-directdraw [unknown-configure-option]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-cutlisteditor rdepends on aio-grab, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-dvdburn rdepends on cdrkit, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-dvdburn rdepends on dvd+rw-tools, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-dvdburn rdepends on mjpegtools, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-dvdburn rdepends on dvdauthor, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-dvdburn rdepends on replex, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-wirelesslan rdepends on wireless-tools, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-wirelesslan rdepends on wpa-supplicant, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-ushare rdepends on ushare, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-openuitzendinggemist rdepends on python-argparse, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-blindscan rdepends on virtual/blindscan-dvbs, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-bonjour rdepends on avahi-daemon, but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
WARNING: QA Issue: File '/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/SystemPlugins/FirmwareUpgrade/checkvfd' from vuplus-checkvfd was already stripped, this will prevent future debugging! [already-stripped]
WARNING: File 'usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/SystemPlugins/FirmwareUpgrade/checkvfd' from vuplus-checkvfd was already stripped, this will prevent future debugging!
WARNING: QA Issue: enigma2-plugin-extensions-openwebif: /enigma2-plugin-extensions-openwebif/usr/lib/enigma2/python/Plugins/Extensions/OpenWebif/backport/OrderedDict.pyo is owned by uid 1000, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may be due to host contamination [host-user-contaminated]
WARNING: QA Issue: samba: invalid PACKAGECONFIG: sysv [invalid-packageconfig]
WARNING: QA Issue: /sbin/osd@underscore@login_nfs-utils contained in package nfs-utils requires /bin/bash, but no providers found in its RDEPENDS [file-rdeps]
WARNING: The license listed GPL was not in the licenses collected for recipe linux-vuduo2
WARNING: [log_check] openpli-enigma2-image: found a warning message in the logfile (keyword 'WARNING:'):
[log_check] WARNING: The license listed GPL was not in the licenses collected for recipe linux-vuduo2

NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 4316 tasks of which 10 didn't need to be rerun and all succeeded.

Summary: There were 29 WARNING messages shown.
 

[athoik]

...and all succeeded.

Don't worry about warnings, everyone has them. Although from time to time we are reducing them.

[dax]

Build openpli 4 on archlinux fails

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.25.0"
BUILD_SYS         = "x86_64-linux"
NATIVELSBSTRING   = "Arch-rolling"
TARGET_SYS        = "mipsel-oe-linux"
MACHINE           = "vusolo2"
DISTRO            = "openpli"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "4"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "o32 fpu-hard mips32"
TARGET_FPU        = ""
meta-oe           
meta-filesystems  
meta-multimedia   
meta-networking   
meta-python       = "(HEADdetachedat9c926ef):9c926ef2d463e643fb0dc87f6535a12e35d039ab"
meta              = "(HEADdetachedateb9d896):eb9d896db2fc67bac8efd258744d06fbbee87f06"
meta-openpli      
meta-dream        = "master:7e2071f26a151e2f989b100031ce3bbd286325ed"
meta-vuplus       = "(HEADdetachedat20627ff):20627ff9464cb5c75e1c1bd865d73f04f5b6f2ee"
meta-xp           = "(HEADdetachedatb12992d):b12992d4637f8d8ef41ac205cc5f919bc9d2df45"
meta-xtrend       = "(HEADdetachedate353767):e3537676e087cc5bcf6a90e8805b36ed6d4a7c42"
meta-formuler     = "(HEADdetachedat6bc736d):6bc736d082ca53231f55d7dde9b46c580991c1bb"
meta-hd           = "(HEADdetachedatb5fcb1f):b5fcb1f4a39a407d2f8b2336e0598d8d06e65f4d"
meta-local        = "master:7e2071f26a151e2f989b100031ce3bbd286325ed"

Any help?

Attached Files

•  log.do_compile.1889.zip   3.79KB   4 downloads

[blzr]

master branch?

on most of up-to-date distros, for building openpli4, you should use master-for-gcc5 branch, it has better chance to succeed

master branch is actually over a year old oe snapshot, severely outdated,
gcc5 branch has some upstream changes related to gcc upgrade ported, however, on cutting edge distros it could be still not enough...

[dax]

master branch?

on most of up-to-date distros, for building openpli4, you should use master-for-gcc5 branch, it has better chance to succeed

master branch is actually over a year old oe snapshot, severely outdated,
gcc5 branch has some upstream changes related to gcc upgrade ported, however, on cutting edge distros it could be still not enough...

Uhm... I use this one for openpli 4

git clone git://git.code.sf.net/p/openpli/openpli-oe-core

and this one for openpli 5

git clone -b master-next https://github.com/openpli/openpli-oe-core

Then i run (for both distros)

make -f Makefile
cd build
source env.source
MACHINE=vusolo2
bitbake openpli-enigma2-image

[blzr]

as I wrote, use master-for-gcc5 branch for building oprnpli4

git checkout master-for-gcc5
git pull

[WanWizard]

And don't use sourceforge, that repo isn't used anymore.

[blzr]

oops, didn't spot this...
and you can still clone openpli repo from sf?

@dax
openpli repositories are hosted on github for quite a time now
https://github.com/O...openpli-oe-core

[dax]

I'm right?

git clone git://github.com/OpenPLi/openpli-oe-core
cd openpli-oe-core
git checkout master-for-gcc5
git pull

[WanWizard]

Yes.