Jump to content


Photo

Bug in pli


  • Please log in to reply
97 replies to this topic

#1 williamzzz

  • Member
  • 20 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 1 October 2015 - 02:33

Hello all

 

I'm using one of the latest downloads for VU+ solo2 and have found that the "Hide channel" funtion

does not work anymore. 

 

As you know you can set this flag in Dreamboxedit.

 

Any ideas?



Re: Bug in pli #2 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,023 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 1 October 2015 - 07:01

Hello all

 

I'm using one of the latest downloads for VU+ solo2 and have found that the "Hide channel" funtion

does not work anymore. 

 

As you know you can set this flag in Dreamboxedit.

 

Any ideas?

Question littlesat


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Bug in pli #3 williamzzz

  • Member
  • 20 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 1 October 2015 - 10:24

"Question"

 

What do you mean by that?



Re: Bug in pli #4 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,023 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 1 October 2015 - 12:04

"Question"

 

What do you mean by that?

The answer to this question knows ...


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Bug in pli #5 williamzzz

  • Member
  • 20 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 1 October 2015 - 13:41

Can someone who is intelligent give a sensible reply.



Re: Bug in pli #6 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,621 posts

+1,739
Excellent

Posted 1 October 2015 - 13:49

He means: ask Littlesat, he might know the answer.

 

I personally never knew that such a feature exists, and how you can "unhide" the channel on the box. Or do you mean the blacklist function (Ctrl-L I believe in DreamboxEdit)?


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Bug in pli #7 williamzzz

  • Member
  • 20 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 1 October 2015 - 14:01

In Dreamboxedit right click on the service name, then click on "show/edit" details" .

 

A window will open.  On the right side  of the window you tick various flags.

 

The Hide flag was useful if you wanted to manipulate channel numbers.



Re: Bug in pli #8 williamzzz

  • Member
  • 20 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 12 October 2015 - 13:22

Please can this problem be fixed?



Re: Bug in pli #9 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 12 October 2015 - 19:41

You can hide channels that has parental control..... This is an option in the parental control settings. You can unhide them when you enter a pincode (via menu unlock parental locked channels or something like that)....  And here it works as a charm....

 

You can add numbered markers in openpli that can be hidden... by a setting (in channel list 2x menu, then 7th option).... When you move channels around the numbered markers will be un-hiden always by default... Also this feature is working here with the latest openpli...


Edited by littlesat, 12 October 2015 - 19:44.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Bug in pli #10 untitled

  • Member
  • 5 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 October 2015 - 07:20

You can hide channels that has parental control..... This is an option in the parental control settings. You can unhide them when you enter a pincode (via menu unlock parental locked channels or something like that)....  And here it works as a charm....

 

You can add numbered markers in openpli that can be hidden... by a setting (in channel list 2x menu, then 7th option).... When you move channels around the numbered markers will be un-hiden always by default... Also this feature is working here with the latest openpli...

 

hi littesat,

 

any idea why this feature was removed? 

 

thanks



Re: Bug in pli #11 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2015 - 11:09

I now understand what you mean... in fact feature wasn't really removed..... The Enigma2 UI did not support his at all...

 

But the hiden channels are depending on the parental blacklist.... they will be unhiden when they are set to hidden in the lamedb...

So put those channels in the blacklist.... (parental lock list).

 

See the commit and comments here..

https://github.com/O...125ca863f948965

 

The big question... .Why do you need to hide services???


Edited by littlesat, 21 October 2015 - 11:13.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Bug in pli #12 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,023 posts

+338
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2015 - 11:34


The big question... .Why do you need to hide services???

For example,  do not want to show service after new scanning.


Edited by Dimitrij, 21 October 2015 - 11:34.

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K


Re: Bug in pli #13 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2015 - 14:20

For example,  do not want to show service after new scanning. 

---> 

uuuh... why should you do that?


Edited by littlesat, 21 October 2015 - 14:21.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Bug in pli #14 untitled

  • Member
  • 5 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 October 2015 - 14:45

I now understand what you mean... in fact feature wasn't really removed..... The Enigma2 UI did not support his at all...

 

But the hiden channels are depending on the parental blacklist.... they will be unhiden when they are set to hidden in the lamedb...

So put those channels in the blacklist.... (parental lock list).

 

See the commit and comments here..

https://github.com/O...125ca863f948965

 

The big question... .Why do you need to hide services???

 

hi littesat,

 

the purpose of doing this is because we create a dummy service in order to fill up the number. 

 

For example if the Sky Sports is on Ch 100, you need to create a dummy service from 1 to 99 just to get number 100 on the user bouquet and thus need the number from 1 to 99 to be hidden. the dxdnotshow flag was working fine until one of the recent builds. My resolution is to use the earlier image build.

 

Sorry for my english this is the best that i could explain.



Re: Bug in pli #15 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2015 - 17:12

You can full it up with numbered markers instead. Note that they are created by openpli years ago for exactly this purpose. E.g. Fastscan and cablescan are using them. Hide dummy services is in fact a work-a-round for your goal. Numbered markers are designed for this goal. Also the user interface does understand them.

Edited by littlesat, 21 October 2015 - 17:25.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Bug in pli #16 untitled

  • Member
  • 5 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 22 October 2015 - 06:44

You can full it up with numbered markers instead. Note that they are created by openpli years ago for exactly this purpose. E.g. Fastscan and cablescan are using them. Hide dummy services is in fact a work-a-round for your goal. Numbered markers are designed for this goal. Also the user interface does understand them.

 

hi littlesat,

 

i understand what you meant but in dreamboxedit there is not option to add numbered marker; there is only text marker which will not effectively make the channel number in order with the provider. 

 

thanks.



Re: Bug in pli #17 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,960 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 22 October 2015 - 12:04

Then maybe it's an idea to contact the author of dreamboxedit and ask him to add it?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: Bug in pli #18 untitled

  • Member
  • 5 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 22 October 2015 - 12:16

Then maybe it's an idea to contact the author of dreamboxedit and ask him to add it?


U got a point there..btw how do u put numbered marker without using dreamboxedit?

Re: Bug in pli #19 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,274 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 22 October 2015 - 14:44

This is an example of a default numbered marker which you can include in a userbouquet...

 

#SERVICE 1:320:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0::-
#DESCRIPTION -
 
And with this you are 'rid' of the work-a-round....

Edited by littlesat, 22 October 2015 - 14:45.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Bug in pli #20 untitled

  • Member
  • 5 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 22 October 2015 - 15:50

 

This is an example of a default numbered marker which you can include in a userbouquet...

 

#SERVICE 1:320:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0::-
#DESCRIPTION -
 
And with this you are 'rid' of the work-a-round....

 

that's perfect. appreciate your help. thanks mate




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users