Kan het zijn dat er een bugje zit in de webinterface? Als ik in de web interface de volledige afstandsbediening wil zien, komt er een icoontje in beeld dat aangeeft dat het bestand niet werd gevonden (vermoedelijk ontbreekt er dus ergens een afbeelding van de volledige remote control...)
Bugje in de webif?
Started by wimpie3, 25 Aug 2015 13:12
12 replies to this topic
Re: Bugje in de webif? #2
-
- PLi® Core member
- 68,538 posts
+1,736
Excellent
Posted 25 August 2015 - 14:29
Welke box? Merk en type? En getest met een OpenPLi4 van vandaag (dus volledig up to date)?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Bugje in de webif? #3
-
- Senior Member
- 40 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 25 August 2015 - 15:59
XP1000, laatste versie van OpenPLI (net nog eens een update gedaan).
"Show Full Remote" geeft een broken image in de plaats van het beeld van de afstandsbediening (bestand "/images/remotes/dm_normal.png" bestaat niet).
Re: Bugje in de webif? #4
-
- PLi® Core member
- 68,538 posts
+1,736
Excellent
Posted 25 August 2015 - 18:26
Dat lijkt me ook het verkeerde plaatje, het hoort deze te zijn: https://github.com/E...rc14_normal.png. de dm_normal.png staat overigens in dezelfde directory.
Heb je toevallig met de RC settings zitten spelen en een DMM afstandbediening geconfigureerd?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Bugje in de webif? #5
-
- PLi® Core member
- 46,951 posts
+541
Excellent
Posted 25 August 2015 - 18:39
En anders wordt het opnieuw flashen ben ik bang...
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Re: Bugje in de webif? #6
-
- Senior Member
- 1,490 posts
+47
Good
Posted 25 August 2015 - 18:49
Vu+DUO4K, (DVB-C FBC & DVB-S2X FBC twin tuner), OpenPLi Nightly Build, My-FullNightHD skin, Bluetooth remote,
2x Synology DS-116, 16 Gb USB3, Autotimer, Bitrate, EPG-Import, Ziggo Kabel-tv, Astra 28.2.
Re: Bugje in de webif? #7
-
- Senior Member
- 3,443 posts
+43
Good
Posted 25 August 2015 - 18:55
Bij de et10k wel een remote, vanavond ge-update.
Attached Files
-
et10k.jpg 29.39KB
4 downloads
Edited by catastrofus, 25 August 2015 - 18:57.
2 x ultimo4k (dvb-c fbc + 1 dvb-s2, 8.3r/nb) + een et10k/osmini (geen tuners en dus fallbackclient, nb) met een Synology ds214+ (2 x 6 TB) op DSM 7.1.1 in ziggo oost (voormalig @Home) + A1/A2/A3/HB (TechniSat)
Re: Bugje in de webif? #8
-
- Senior Member
- 40 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 25 August 2015 - 19:11
Flashen heb ik al drie keer gedaan de afgelopen maanden, dit probleem heb ik al sinds ik m'n XP1000 in gebruik heb...
Re: Bugje in de webif? #9
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,991 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 25 August 2015 - 22:01
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: Bugje in de webif? #10
-
- PLi® Core member
- 56,254 posts
+691
Excellent
Posted 25 August 2015 - 22:10
It is not openpli that does not accept it... As far I understood are more oe-a people minded people that do not accept it...
And than it is just related to the box branding that oe-a made which is not acceptable from the beginning as it should be feature drive.... They really do not understand princyple basics and loads their enigma2 with tons of if box type is x than do y... These checks shoud be principally not allowed in enigma2 as principlally the manufactures should adapt (which seems thanks to all those adaptions also an utopy at this moment).
And now the openwebif is a pain.... Because others do not understand princyples.... i personally get the feeling they only want to support as much boxes as possible without concerning any "standards"...
And than it is just related to the box branding that oe-a made which is not acceptable from the beginning as it should be feature drive.... They really do not understand princyple basics and loads their enigma2 with tons of if box type is x than do y... These checks shoud be principally not allowed in enigma2 as principlally the manufactures should adapt (which seems thanks to all those adaptions also an utopy at this moment).
And now the openwebif is a pain.... Because others do not understand princyples.... i personally get the feeling they only want to support as much boxes as possible without concerning any "standards"...
Edited by littlesat, 25 August 2015 - 22:20.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: Bugje in de webif? #11
-
- Senior Member
- 985 posts
+20
Neutral
Posted 26 August 2015 - 07:21
Flashen heb ik al drie keer gedaan de afgelopen maanden, dit probleem heb ik al sinds ik m'n XP1000 in gebruik heb...
Op mijn xp1000 toont hij nog steeds de AB volledig in Version: OWIF 0.4.7, laatste update van gistermorgen en laatste flash van OpenPLi-4.0-beta-xp1000-20150725_usb
Attached Files
-
XP1000remote.png 107.06KB
6 downloads
Edited by Jan Gruuthuse, 26 August 2015 - 07:24.
Sf8HD, sf8008, OpenPli 9.0, fixed lnb 28.2E, 19.2E
Re: Bugje in de webif? #12
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,991 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 26 August 2015 - 08:23
It is not openpli that does not accept it... As far I understood are more oe-a people minded people that do not accept it...
And than it is just related to the box branding that oe-a made which is not acceptable from the beginning as it should be feature drive.... They really do not understand princyple basics and loads their enigma2 with tons of if box type is x than do y... These checks shoud be principally not allowed in enigma2 as principlally the manufactures should adapt (which seems thanks to all those adaptions also an utopy at this moment).
And now the openwebif is a pain.... Because others do not understand princyples.... i personally get the feeling they only want to support as much boxes as possible without concerning any "standards"...
I'm sorry for what I write in English...
Maybe better to add a patch to:
https://github.com/O...nwebif.bbappend
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: Bugje in de webif? #13
-
- PLi® Core member
- 56,254 posts
+691
Excellent
Posted 26 August 2015 - 08:45
Could be considered...
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
