31 replies to this topic

[WanWizard]

8.3 the RC use --> https://github.com/O...wareInfo.py#L66

9.1 use --> https://github.com/O...wareInfo.py#L43

 

This determines the device name, where exactly is the name of the remote file determined?
 

[WanWizard]

It's not homebuild. Original PLi image.

 

I said that because you mentioned OpenPLi 9.1. Which does not exist (yet).
 

[WanWizard]

Can you post the /var/lib/enigma.info file from your box?

 

And sorry, I meant /usr/lib/enigma.info.

[Stan]

root@et9x00:/proc/stb# cat /usr/lib/enigma.info
architecture='mips32el'
avjack=False
blindscanbinary='blindscan'
brand='xtrend'
ci=True
compiledate='20241217'
dboxlcd=True
developername='openpli'
displaybrand='Xtrend'
displaydistro='OpenPLi'
displaymodel='ET9X00'
displaytype='textlcd'
distro='openpli'
driversdate='20180412'
dvi=False
feedsurl='http://downloads.openpli.org/feeds/openpli-develop'
fhdskin=True
forcemode=no
fpu=''
friendlyfamily='et9x00'
hdmi=True
hdmifhdin=False
hdmihdin=False
hdmistandbymode=0
imagebuild='1d0b97e1'
imagedevbuild=''
imagedir='et9x00'
imagefs=' ubi'
imagetype='rev'
imageversion='develop'
imglanguage=multilang
imgrevision='1d0b97e1'
imgversion='develop'
kernel='3.8.7'
kexecmb=False
kernelfile='kernel.bin'
machine='et9x00'
machinebuild='et9x00'
mediaservice='servicegstreamer'
middleflash=False
mkubifs=-m 2048 -e 126976 -c 4096
model=et9x00
mtdbootfs=''
mtdkernel='mtd1'
mtdrootfs='mtd2'
multilib=False
multitranscoding=False
oe='hardknott (3.3.6)'
platform='et9x00'
python='3.9.9'
rca=False
rcidnum=2
rcname='dmm1'
rctype=9
rootfile='rootfs.bin'
scart=True
noscartswitch=
scartyuv=False
smallflash=True
socfamily='bcm7413'
svideo=False
timerwakeupmode=0
transcoding=False
ubinize='-m 2048 -p 128KiB'
vfdsymbol=False
wol=False
wwol=False
yocto='3.3.6'
yuv=True
checksum=56cedc55f8b3c2197b7b4c14c593e6c9
root@et9x00:/proc/stb#

[WanWizard]

It is odd this ever worked.

 

According to your output:

/proc/stb/ir/rc/type:11

but there has never been a type 11, only a 4, 6 and 9: https://github.com/O...models.cfg#L141

 

Have you selected a unsupported custom remote by any chance?

[Stan]

I have not selected another RC. It was already wrong at first boot in the Install Wizard.

[WanWizard]

Odd, no clue where type 11 comes from.

 

It should than default back to

et9200          et9x00

( from /usr/share/enigma2/rc_models/rc_models.cfg.

 

But that doesn't work either, because littlesat has used "machine" as variable, which is the image base name, not the box name, which is in machinebuild. So this requires more fixes.

 

And not easy to change, as that contains OE-A compatible names, so more needs to be changed to use that variable.

 

So this has to go onto the todo, not a quick fix.

[WanWizard]

@litlesat, it is probably the easiest to switch the the boxinfo variable "rcname" like Huevos already mentioned, which is meant to be used for this, but is currently not set by the BSP.

[Stan]

Please, by no means a hasty solution...

As long as it will be fixed in the upcoming release, it's fine.

 

The current develop branch will become the new Release 9.1, right?

[WanWizard]

The current develop branch will become the new Release 9.1, right?

 

Yes. It is already branched off, but I keep it in sync with any last minute fixes committed to develop.

 

[littlesat]

@litlesat, it is probably the easiest to switch the the boxinfo variable "rcname" like Huevos already mentioned, which is meant to be used for this, but is currently not set by the BSP,
->
I suggest that should be fine.

[WanWizard]

I've added it (adding it to the BSP) to my todo list for next year .