I can reproduce the issue on an Edision OS Mini +. Flashes fine, boots fine, shows the OpenPLi bootlogo, crashes with a green screen, loops, no network.
I'll try to find the time to dive into it.
Posted 19 May 2025 - 14:16
I can reproduce the issue on an Edision OS Mini +. Flashes fine, boots fine, shows the OpenPLi bootlogo, crashes with a green screen, loops, no network.
I'll try to find the time to dive into it.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 19 May 2025 - 14:40
RPROVIDES:kernel-image = "kernel-image-${KERNEL_VERSION} kernel-${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}"
please try with build add this to linux-kernel.
Something is wrong with the Vmlinux and the package and the Ubinize.
follow this commit Oe-Alliance
https://github.com/o...23357a2808f1c41
Edited by rantanplan, 19 May 2025 - 14:43.
Posted 19 May 2025 - 14:56
What does this do, and why is this not in issue with other builds, which use exactly the same kernel?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 19 May 2025 - 15:09
There were error messages when switching from Kirkstone to Scarthgap.
The errors have been removed, the kernel is built and the UBI is created.
But only that eliminating an error does not mean that the kernel image is now also chosen correctly.
# By default, kernel.bbclass modifies package names to allow multiple kernels
# to be installed in parallel. We revert this change and rprovide the versioned
# package names instead, to allow only one kernel to be installed.
RPROVIDES:${KERNEL_PACKAGE_NAME}-base = "kernel-${KERNEL_VERSION}"
RPROVIDES:${KERNEL_PACKAGE_NAME}-image = "kernel-image-${KERNEL_VERSION}"
You should consider this as a whole.
This has also been done to create a real core.
It affects everything that is built via UBI if I understand that correctly.
Maybe I'm completely wrong.
https://github.com/O...7e5cef5fdac7be8
https://github.com/O...ae4ce6e8ad449ea
follow this commits in our BSP
Edited by rantanplan, 19 May 2025 - 15:15.
Posted 23 May 2025 - 23:36
Posted 24 May 2025 - 12:10
Flash full ?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 25 May 2025 - 07:24
Edited by littlesat, 25 May 2025 - 07:28.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Posted 25 May 2025 - 23:30
OpenMultiboot always had an issue with "multibooting" a more recent image while the base image was older.
Chances are you have a root image that is using a more recent OE that OpenPLi release images, as they tend to be behind images of others, notably OE-A based images.
And this is because it is not a strict multiboot, the root image "bleeds" through into the others, causing issues with fox example glibc versions...
If the root/base image is newer, you run less of a risk, as libraries tend to be backwards compatible (but not always).
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 26 May 2025 - 16:08
To which I replied:
Flash full ?
I can't see any other reason why lamedb couldn't be written.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 26 May 2025 - 16:32
Yes, I know that.
My point was I gave a reply when you posted it, and you've ignored it.
You get that error either because your flash is full, or /etc/enigma2 does not exist.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 26 May 2025 - 20:40
The error is triggered by a C fopen() call for the file in write mode. Which should succeed regardless of the contents of the current file.
I think even in the case of a full filesystem, in which case it would crash on the first write. So my guess is /etc/enigma does not exist.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users