Jump to content


Photo

Plz post your experiences

ET 5k/9k - HDMI-CEC

  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

Re: Plz post your experiences #61 ette9000

  • Member
  • 15 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 16 October 2011 - 11:10


eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 00
eHdmiCEC: received message 8C
eHdmiCEC: send message 87 00 00 00


The tv is requesting the vendorid there.
We use 00 00 00 (no particular vendor id)
Maybe your tv gets a bit more cooperative if you use the LG vendor id instead:

 
elif message == "vendorid":
  cmd = 0x87
  data = '\x00\xE0\x91'

(python/Components/HdmiCec.py, line 110)


Thank you for reply!
My answer is coming a little late, sorry for that !
I changed the value of the vendorid.

this is the log file:
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 00
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 00
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
so my LG is answering 00 (which i interprete as ok)
maybe it wants to know which device will be connecting (in simplink i have the following devices: TV, DISK, VDR, HDD Recorder, Loudspeaker)
Clarke Tech ET9000 openpli (Linux 3.3.0) Dreambox 600pvr openpli 2.1 TV LG 37LE4500

Re: Plz post your experiences #62 sypo

  • Member
  • 32 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 11 December 2012 - 11:48

I have LG 42LX6500 and ET9000.
Unfortunately, the HDMI-CEC does not work. The only response to the exclusion of TV ET9000 enter into standby.
I made the modification:

Maybe your tv gets a bit more cooperative if you use the LG vendor id instead:

elif message == "vendorid":
  cmd = 0x87
  data = '\x00\xE0\x91'
(python/Components/HdmiCec.py, line 110)

And then I logged exclusively TV (ET9000 enter into standby):
eHdmiCEC: received message 44 45
eHdmiCEC: received message 45
eHdmiCEC: received message 36
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 36
And turn on the TV (ET9000 no response):
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 00 F0
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 8C
eHdmiCEC: send message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 A0
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
7730
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
Throughout the work appears in the log:
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 87 00 E0 91
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01
eHdmiCEC: received message 89 01

I found a nice document on the network, it can be useful for someone: http://collaboration..._v1_3-FINAL.pdf

Re: Plz post your experiences #63 sypo

  • Member
  • 32 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 12 December 2012 - 22:33

ET9000 will support the SimpLink?

Edited by sypo, 12 December 2012 - 22:38.


Re: Plz post your experiences #64 sypo

  • Member
  • 32 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 19 June 2013 - 11:17

I think I found the cause of the SimpLink.

Initiation SympLink logged in:

f6e23a62ff7975a9.jpg

As you can see LG sends VendorCommand_LG and exactly SL_COMMAND_CONNECT_REQUEST (89:04:00).

I found a project where there is already support this and other commands LG: https://github.com/o.../master/cec.cpp


Edited by sypo, 19 June 2013 - 11:17.



3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users