Does anyone know if there is a way to disable service names from being updated?
Disable service ame Updates?
Started by awx, 17 Dec 2011 14:42
13 replies to this topic
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #2
-
- Senior Member
- 122 posts
+6
Neutral
Posted 17 December 2011 - 14:45
Some images have an option for that, for example ViX.
Sony VPL-HW55ES + Stewart Firehawk 182cm, 2 * Nvidia Shield, LibreElec + 5 * Intel NUC, Vu+ Uno4k & T90+8lnb, 28Tb Thecus N7510 NAS, Denon AVR-X1100W, AMX+ 3*Ipad, 3*KefQ1, 4*KefQ2DS, Elac S12EQ
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #3
-
- Senior Member
- 297 posts
+17
Neutral
Posted 17 December 2011 - 14:47
Some images have an option for that, for example ViX.
Thanks for the response
Do you know if its possible to just rename the service in a user bouquet? This way I wouldn't need to disable service name updating.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #4
-
- Senior Member
- 1,573 posts
+33
Good
Posted 17 December 2011 - 16:03
disable backgroundscanning
ET10000 C C C C/T 2TB HDD ET7000 + ET6000 dvb-S OpenPli Triax 88 multifeed quad LNBs VU Uno4K SE C+2TB HDD Mutant HD60
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #5
-
- Senior Member
- 297 posts
+17
Neutral
Posted 17 December 2011 - 16:20
disable backgroundscanning
Thanks, I also saw that adding a #DESCRIPTION line in the user bouquets file will let me rename only in those files.
Thanks for the support everyone.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #6
-
- Senior Member
- 2,616 posts
+30
Good
Posted 17 December 2011 - 18:06
Yes, you can change the name in a given bouquet using DreamboxEdit.
ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E
HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #7
-
- Senior Member
- 297 posts
+17
Neutral
Posted 17 December 2011 - 21:02
I couldn't find a version of dream box edit for osx or linux, so this is not an option for me.Yes, you can change the name in a given bouquet using DreamboxEdit.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #8
-
- Senior Member
- 1,596 posts
+49
Good
Posted 18 December 2011 - 03:41
DBedit runs pretty well under WINE in Linux...
--
hemi
--
hemi
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #9
-
- Senior Member
- 137 posts
+8
Neutral
Posted 18 December 2011 - 11:32
Hi awx!!!
DreamBoxEdit - Mac Edition 4.0.1.1 v1.1 Ported By Bobsilvio.
HERE
I`m running it on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2 (11C74), i don`t use it that much so i`m not running it on a daily basis, but if i remember correctly, it works fine but you gotta edit your box`s profile everytime you launch it, another option is to use "webbouqueteditor" from the download feed under "extensions", accessible from webinterface as "BouquetEditor" under extras after download.
Enjoy!.
DreamBoxEdit - Mac Edition 4.0.1.1 v1.1 Ported By Bobsilvio.
HERE
I`m running it on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2 (11C74), i don`t use it that much so i`m not running it on a daily basis, but if i remember correctly, it works fine but you gotta edit your box`s profile everytime you launch it, another option is to use "webbouqueteditor" from the download feed under "extensions", accessible from webinterface as "BouquetEditor" under extras after download.
Enjoy!.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #10
-
- Senior Member
- 297 posts
+17
Neutral
Posted 18 December 2011 - 11:43
Thanks, Ill give those options a try definitely better than trying to manually edit the files.Hi awx!!!
DreamBoxEdit - Mac Edition 4.0.1.1 v1.1 Ported By Bobsilvio.
HERE
I`m running it on Mac OS X Lion 10.7.2 (11C74), i don`t use it that much so i`m not running it on a daily basis, but if i remember correctly, it works fine but you gotta edit your box`s profile everytime you launch it, another option is to use "webbouqueteditor" from the download feed under "extensions", accessible from webinterface as "BouquetEditor" under extras after download.
Enjoy!.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #11
-
- PLi® Core member
- 46,960 posts
+541
Excellent
Posted 19 December 2011 - 14:32
Better not turn off background scanning, it has some nasty side-effects.
In the lamedb there is a flag to prevent enigma from changing the name of the service, you can either set that flag manually (use search function / google, it has been mentioned earlier) or use an external bouquet editor to set this flag on the service.
By the way, VIX, why hasn't this change been pushed back to OpenPLi or at least been published? Looks like a useful extention to me.
In the lamedb there is a flag to prevent enigma from changing the name of the service, you can either set that flag manually (use search function / google, it has been mentioned earlier) or use an external bouquet editor to set this flag on the service.
By the way, VIX, why hasn't this change been pushed back to OpenPLi or at least been published? Looks like a useful extention to me.
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #12
-
- PLi® Core member
- 32,766 posts
+245
Excellent
Posted 19 December 2011 - 22:59
Better not turn off background scanning, it has some nasty side-effects.
Not anymore, the old refcount bug is avoided now. (since a couple of months)
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #13
-
- PLi® Core member
- 46,960 posts
+541
Excellent
Posted 20 December 2011 - 15:10
I was referring to updates in the metadata of the service.
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Re: Disable service ame Updates? #14
-
- PLi® Core member
- 32,766 posts
+245
Excellent
Posted 20 December 2011 - 22:49
I was referring to updates in the metadata of the service.
ok, indeed a valid reason to keep the background scan enabled
I just assumed you were referring to the infamous refcount bug, because of which we have been advising people to not disable background scan for a long time.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
