Jump to content


Photo

CCcam 2.3.0 Backdoor ?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

Re: CCcam 2.3.0 Backdoor ? #21 malakudi

  • Senior Member
  • 1,449 posts

+69
Good

Posted 9 January 2012 - 22:22

@HPPli: Take a look at the really long discussion for the disconnecting client issue, at eurocardsharing.com
Other bugs:
- problem with SID on newcamd connections on multiple ECM requests (all requests share same SID in the packet).
- problem with hostname filter, if hostname doesn't resolve all hosts are allowed, correct would be none allowed.
- problem with demuxer, if EMM demuxer gets too many data it fails
the list goes on and on.

The problem is you can't find the developers to tell them about those problems. In OSCAM all problems well reported are solved. Did you report your problem in detail in oscam ticket system?

Edited by malakudi, 9 January 2012 - 22:24.


Re: CCcam 2.3.0 Backdoor ? #22 psionguy

  • Member
  • 17 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 4 February 2012 - 12:07

I am not an expert with CCcam, but recently I had a peer contact me to say he could no longer connect to my server, when I checked could see no problem. So I ran a check on the IP location which showed it was located in Germany when my peer lives in Malta. I then checked his host name, which showed it was located in Malta. So the cline I had issued him had been hacked and was being used by someone in Germany. I asked him to check if he had any peers using 2.3, his reply was 2 peers (which he has now blocked) This may be just a coincidence, but it is the first time it has happened to me, so I am being very cautious with this Vs of CCcam.

Edited by psionguy, 4 February 2012 - 12:10.



3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users