72 replies to this topic

[MiLo]

As for DMM's "OE2.0", that's just a slightly different way of building the same thing. The new drivers and kernels for the dreamboxes can also be compiled from the OpenPLi 2.1 system, delivering the same end result.

[pieterg]

And also, "OE-2.0" is not closed. It's enigma2 which is closed.

[a4tech]

Do You plan to add (clone oe.20 repo of webkit ) a Web Browser to OpenPLi tree, for Dreambox boxes ? and HBBTV ?

Edited by a4tech, 7 May 2012 - 13:55.

[pieterg]

no, we will keep using our own enigma2.

[Happysat]

And using kernel 3.2 with the new drivers also gonna happen in the future for PLi pieterg..??

Edited by Happysat, 7 May 2012 - 16:54.

[pieterg]

yes, assuming that our e2 will still work with the new drivers

[Happysat]

Okay thanks i did see allready 3.2 references in OpenPLi GIT

[malakudi]

What all this fuss is about? DMM just switched to newer kernel and adopted interesting features that were already available in their competitors' products. They didn't copy OpenPLI and OpenPLI didn't steal anything from DMM.

How do you know their closed-source C++ code does not contain something 'borrowed' from our open source C++ code?

I don't. I was actually taking about 3.2 kernel usage, not the closed source enigma2 code.

[Happysat]

They did also release a new bootloader with OE2.0 support:


http://sources.dream...0.0_dm800se.ipk

http://sources.dream...r10.0_dm800.ipk

http://sources.dream...10.0_dm8000.ipk

[daimon]

I have compiled a cvs dm800se for the environment is enormous curiosity takes up almost 40GB of space and nfi file is 53.7 mb.

[christophecvr]

Hello,

I just try to compile openpli for dm8000 with kernel 3.2 I just changed the git branch to GIT_BRANCH = dreambox-kernel-3.2 (in make file)
bitbake branch kept on 1.12
Build fails on eglibc log in included. also conf files included and output terminal second try

It seems that kernel headers needed for 3.2 are missing ?

Attached Files

•  terminaloutsecondtry.txt   12.22KB   3 downloads
•  log.do_configure-5660.txt   10.03KB   0 downloads
•  site-conf.txt   70bytes   0 downloads
•  local-conf.txt   784bytes   0 downloads

[popeye2]

CI+ requires the software to be closed.

Really?
Is CI+ based on obscurity?
IMHO you have a TPM like boot loader not allowing modification of any executable bit ...
But necessarily it is not a hurdle for open source.
Even NDS receivers are linux based nowadays, and GPL license information can be read from user menu (e.g. sky italia)

[christophecvr]

I think I need to change a extra config since it seems it build still kernel 2.6.18 initially instead of 3.2. I can't find anymore in which file tghis config is set

[MiLo]

I just try to compile openpli for dm8000 with kernel 3.2 I just changed the git branch to GIT_BRANCH = dreambox-kernel-3.2 (in make file)
bitbake branch kept on 1.12

That branch is mostly for my own convenience, and it (currently) won't finish a compile successfully anyway.
There's probably still a mistake in the .conf somewhere.

Anyway, when it's ready it'll go into the mainline. Until then, it's just there for whomever wants to live on the cutting edge (and thus must expect to bleed).

[christophecvr]

Yes it was just for test, I noticed that (using the way i did trough adapted make file to build a full image from scratch) It builds the dm8000-2.6.18 and to that it ad's the 2.6.31 libc-headers

[ad57]

hi team openpli support 0.e2. for dream800?

[Roodkapke]

If you mean the latest closed source by DMM, no we will not support it.
We develop our own now, independent from DMM.

[Coolman]

for plugin developer:

is it possible to make a mips32el pyo at a OE1.6 system ???

[radxnl]

most oe-core are running on python 2.7 instead of 2.6 so i give you only little chance, but you can try, probably for .py files no problem but .pyo hmmm dunno

more easy is to set up a core distro, its not much work you can use dmm 2.0 or our upcoming oe-core release

[ims]

I hope, that PLi will not go on route as DMM and size of image will not finished for 800se over 50MB!!!