182 replies to this topic

[littlesat]

No news from vu yet...
Probably we have to wait until next year

Edited by littlesat, 31 December 2012 - 14:19.

[Pale-Rider]

What influence or financial interest are moving at this time in sat scene ?
Sincerely i have many doubts in what is happening around and behind.

You are by far better informed than me but are you suggesting the e2 alliance is having a hidden agenda?
Its also striking that openpli isnt involved into this alliance but from what I have read about it: why should we start something new if its already there?
e2open plugins, and if I remember correctly you and skaman were also promotors of it.
As for a result we now have a very good working openwebif but seems to me after that it was total silence.
I still use your bh_tuner_server plugin to feed .m3u to my dune mediaplayer.

There is hidden agenda behind the OE-Alliance, it is simply a collective of like minded coders and image teams who decided the better way forward was to work together to better them selves. As to pli's reasons for not participating thats something only they could answer.

[Pale-Rider]

You are by far better informed than me but are you suggesting the e2 alliance is having a hidden agenda?
Its also striking that openpli isnt involved into this alliance but from what I have read about it: why should we start something new if its already there?
e2open plugins, and if I remember correctly you and skaman were also promotors of it.
As for a result we now have a very good working openwebif but seems to me after that it was total silence.
I still use your bh_tuner_server plugin to feed .m3u to my dune mediaplayer.

No i really don't know. I only see strange things happening.
First of all i have not understood where this alliance is going out.
I have not understood why Vix had suddenly change their relationship with Pli
I have not understood why Skaman leave e2openplugins and Pli git without any word and starts this "alliance".
i have not understood why all this alliance seems to be born cloning OpenPli work.
I think that is strange too that Openpli have not yet supported Solo2 in their git and seems that nobody else of the alliance is going to release an image for Solo2.
Maybe i am stupid by i have the suspect that until Openpli will add support in oe-core for Solo2 machine it is difficoult that we will see images for Solo2 by OE Alliance.
So back to the original question. Those teams are Pli based. Pli is here and e2OpenPlugins is here.
Where and why this OE Alliance is coming from ?

The OE-Alliance are not reliant on pli for the solo2, and ViX already have a image out for this box. i think your looking for conspiracies where there are none to be found.

[bacicciosat]

The OE-Alliance are not reliant on pli for the solo2, and ViX already have a image out for this box.

Vix after the post you quoted Vix have released image for Solo2.
This seems not so consistent with the bad words and the statements against Vu+ posted @ Vix board but is a good new because Vix images have many fans that are going to buy this nice box.
Happy new year !!

[redribo]

Sorry but this fight is not for simple users.....

We waiting vix and pli team to make images for this receiver!!!!!

[Trial]

Hi,

We waiting vix and pli team to make images for this receiver!!!!!

did you read the last posts? ViX is out for a week.

ciao

[hemertje]

Sorry but this fight is not for simple users.....

We waiting vix and pli team to make images for this receiver!!!!!

there is no fight
We (OpenPLi) just do what we think it is best for our hobby, such does Vix

[malakudi]

The OE-Alliance are not reliant on pli for the solo2, and ViX already have a image out for this box. i think your looking for conspiracies where there are none to be found.

I can't really understand the oe-alliance concept. If the openembedded stuff is common for all teams, where are the recipes for vu+ solo2? I can't seem to find them in the oe-alliance git, nor in the openvix git.

[Rob van der Does]

If the openembedded stuff is common for all teams, where are the recipes for vu+ solo2? I can't seem to find them in the oe-alliance git, nor in the openvix git.

Well, it's there all right.
Did you look at e.g. the OE-Alliance-Core?

[malakudi]

If the openembedded stuff is common for all teams, where are the recipes for vu+ solo2? I can't seem to find them in the oe-alliance git, nor in the openvix git.

Well, it's there all right.
Did you look at e.g. the OE-Alliance-Core?

My mistake, yes it is there. I think I checked the day after the first VIX was released and it wasn't there but now it is.

[Pale-Rider]

The OE-Alliance are not reliant on pli for the solo2, and ViX already have a image out for this box.

Vix after the post you quoted Vix have released image for Solo2.
This seems not so consistent with the bad words and the statements against Vu+ posted @ Vix board but is a good new because Vix images have many fans that are going to buy this nice box.
Happy new year !!

There were a number of factors involved and we decided that our own users were the ones suffering at our decision to not support the solo2, plus our stance did yield some promising although limited feedback in the right direction so we decided to go ahead with a BETA release.

[hemertje]

Vu+ solo is checked in today by Milo als we recieved the patches
Check the downloads tomorrow

[redribo]

this is really good news!!!!!!!!!

[malakudi]

Newer drivers have been released, check http://code.vuplus.c...137cfbfd737f8ac

-SRCDATE_vusolo2 = "20121220"
+SRCDATE_vusolo2 = "20130110"

I also can't locate the loopthrough patch in openpli source tree, does that mean that loopthrough is not yet supported for Solo2 in OpenPLI?

[WanWizard]

Correct. It's still our policy not to fix broken drivers by hacking workarounds into the rest of the code.

[littlesat]

And when it is a new special feature that enigma2 "needs to learn", it should not be a straight hack on Enigma2.... but more addressed as a new available feature...

So not simply hack/patch something away... (remove a row with an if statement as VU+ currently does). Not something like "if device == "VU+Duo2" then.... not something like "if chipused == "specific type" then...

But more something "readable" like "if loopthroughFeature == available then"....

I hope everyone can understand this structure....

Edited by littlesat, 14 January 2013 - 15:00.

[kleinerjunge]

Hi.

When will first image be released? Tonight? Download section for Vu+ Solo2 is still empty

cu
KJ

[Raitsa]

In the meantime, I recommend testing the (OpenPLi based) OpenAAF for the Solo2, its a pretty damn great image.

http://images.mynonp...hp?open=vusolo2

[kleinerjunge]

Already using it, but waiting for the OpenPLI

cu
KJ

[Trial]

Hi,

Not something like "if device == "VU+Duo2" then....
not something like "if chipused == "specific type" then...

I can understand that partly but on the other hand it is a bit like least common denominator.

What speaks against:
if device == "VU+Solo2" loopthroughBtoAFeature = available?

ciao