Jump to content


Photo

merge requests for PLi's git


  • Please log in to reply
1748 replies to this topic

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #501 SpaceRat

  • Senior Member
  • 1,030 posts

+65
Good

Posted 17 March 2014 - 15:16

Please replace openvpn_2.1.3.bb in ./openpli-oe-core/meta-openembedded/meta-networking/recipes-support/openvpn using the attached openvpn_2.3.2.bb in order to finally bump the openvpn version to 2.3.2.

This will enable users on IPv6-only resp. DS-lite connections to establish OpenVPN connections using IPv6 as carrier network (Payload can still be IPv4-only).

The update doesn't harm anyone, just updating the client doesn't change the behaviour:
netstat -n
tcp        0      0 192.168.1.16:44433      88.77.xxx.yyy:1194      ESTABLISHED
It will only switch to IPv6/Dual-Stack mode if any tcp/udp-directive is changed to tcp6/udp6, e.g. (Inside <client>.conf):
proto tcp-client
to
proto tcp6-client
Result:
netstat -n
tcp        0      0 2001:db8:affe:0:2bf:ecff:fec0:c0f7:1194 2001:db8:abcd:1234::2:1194 ESTABLISHED

Attached Files


1st box: Vu+ Ultimo 4k 4xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
2nd box: Gigablue Quad 4k 2xDVB-S2 FBC / 2xDVB-C / 1.8 TB HDD / OpenATV 6.2
testing boxes: Vu+ Duo² + AX Quadbox HD2400 + 2x Vu+ Solo² + Octagon SF4008
Sats & Pay-TV: Astra 19.2°E + Hotbird 13°E with Redlight / SCT HD / SES Astra HD- / Sky V14 / 4th empire propaganda TV
Card-Server: Raspberry Pi + IPv6-capable oscam
Router: Linksys WRT1900ACS w/ LEDE + Fritz!Box 7390

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #502 mirakels

  • Forum Moderator
    PLi® Core member
  • 7,603 posts

+62
Good

Posted 17 March 2014 - 17:37

openvpn2.3.2 pushed. build and installed fine om my local setup.

 

Please test tomorrow...


Geen wonder... Had slechts een dm7000, maar wel ook een rotor. eigenlijk al een tijdje ook een dm600 en dm7025. Maar nu kijkend met een et9000 en vuduo

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #503 Taapat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 2,345 posts

+121
Excellent

Posted 17 March 2014 - 19:54

Maybe this will interest some.
I have seen that satellite operators such as Viasat program time in EPG is not the same as the real program start and end time. Different is a few minutes, but when I record manually, not by timer, sometimes record file name is not correct, because it comes from the name of the previous program, which by the EPG information still ends after a few minutes.
Therefore, I create a small workoraund in which, if the current event is executed more than 80%, for recording is used the info from the next event.
I do not know, maybe it should be used if it is executed more than 90%, or about this needs to show a messagebox, but maybe that the such be ok.

--- a/lib/python/Screens/InfoBarGenerics.py
+++ b/lib/python/Screens/InfoBarGenerics.py
@@ -2033,6 +2033,11 @@ class InfoBarInstantRecord:

   if event is not None:
    curEvent = parseEvent(event)
+   position = (curEvent[1]-curEvent[0])*0.8
+   curtime = int(time())
+   if curtime > position: # current event ending soon, therefore use next
+    nextevent = epg.lookupEventTime(info["serviceref"], event.getBeginTime(), +1)
+    curEvent = parseEvent(nextevent)
    info["name"] = curEvent[2]
    info["description"] = curEvent[3]
    info["eventid"] = curEvent[4] 

Attached Files


Edited by Taapat, 17 March 2014 - 19:58.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #504 Taapat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 2,345 posts

+121
Excellent

Posted 17 March 2014 - 20:29

Sorry, in the previous post, I forgot to add the start time in calculating, and verifying if nextevent exists.
Here is the correct patch.

 

--- a/lib/python/Screens/InfoBarGenerics.py
+++ b/lib/python/Screens/InfoBarGenerics.py
@@ -2033,6 +2033,12 @@ class InfoBarInstantRecord:

   if event is not None:
    curEvent = parseEvent(event)
+   position = ((curEvent[1]-curEvent[0])*0.8)+curEvent[0]
+   curtime = int(time())
+   if curtime > position: # current event ending soon, therefore use next
+    nextevent = epg.lookupEventTime(info["serviceref"], event.getBeginTime(), +1)
+    if nextevent is not None:
+     curEvent = parseEvent(nextevent)
    info["name"] = curEvent[2]
    info["description"] = curEvent[3]
    info["eventid"] = curEvent[4] 

 

Attached Files



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #505 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 17 March 2014 - 20:33

Also don't forget to add patches on dreambox dvbmediasink http://openpli.org/f...e-6#entry411712

 

PS. VU also need to recreate patch or stick with a previous SRCREV.


Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #506 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,062 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 17 March 2014 - 22:08

Why using .8 times and not an absoluut difference (e.g. 5 or 10 minutes?).

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #507 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,219 posts

+1,798
Excellent

Posted 17 March 2014 - 22:27

That would go very wrong when you want an instant recording of a program that only lasts 10 min... Using a percentage would make the cut-of point small too...


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #508 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,062 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 17 March 2014 - 22:40

So in fact this is never good....

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #509 Taapat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 2,345 posts

+121
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 08:41

Everyone has their own experiences for the record, I do not know how their used by others, but only referring to my experience, I usually try to record a program completely, and think that a possibility of that someone wants to record the final minutes of the program is much smaller, than someone wants to record program which by EPG information has not yet begun.
Probably need discuss about the percent, but as I WanWizard wrote- use percentage is much better than defined minutes.
Perhaps, need to implement more code, and add addition message box with confirming, if the name will be changed?



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #510 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,062 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 10:41

I think we should sleep on it... What if the next event is only 2 or 5 minutes???

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #511 mirakels

  • Forum Moderator
    PLi® Core member
  • 7,603 posts

+62
Good

Posted 18 March 2014 - 10:58

Maybe add a selection with the current and next (and maybe next next) event  to the screen that pops up after manual record so the user can select the proper event.

The selection can be a drop down list or a radiobutton list...


Geen wonder... Had slechts een dm7000, maar wel ook een rotor. eigenlijk al een tijdje ook een dm600 en dm7025. Maar nu kijkend met een et9000 en vuduo

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #512 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 13:26

[VideoEnhancement] add entry vertical_dejagging, smooth

 

http://code.vuplus.c...1eff882daa89b4e


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #513 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 14:48

[VideoEnhancement] add entry vertical_dejagging, smooth

 

http://code.vuplus.c...1eff882daa89b4e

Can be used for all boxes, as it read proc's. So no hardware specific plugin, just an amendment to the existing version for all boxes.



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #514 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 18:59

[VideoEnhancement] add entry vertical_dejagging, smooth

 

http://code.vuplus.c...1eff882daa89b4e

Can be used for all boxes, as it read proc's. So no hardware specific plugin, just an amendment to the existing version for all boxes.

proc = driver = hardware


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #515 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,062 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 19:00

En waarvoor zijn deze nieuwe procs perse nodig? Krijg je er beter beeld me of zo (waarom dan niet meteen default?)


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #516 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 18 March 2014 - 19:07

 


[VideoEnhancement] add entry vertical_dejagging, smooth

 

http://code.vuplus.c...1eff882daa89b4e

Can be used for all boxes, as it read proc's. So no hardware specific plugin, just an amendment to the existing version for all boxes.

proc = driver = hardware

Exactly.



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #517 mirakels

  • Forum Moderator
    PLi® Core member
  • 7,603 posts

+62
Good

Posted 18 March 2014 - 20:29

this is added in the drivers since this month...

But what does it do??? there are 2 new configuration items:

 

             "Scaler vertical dejagging"
             "Smooth"
 


Geen wonder... Had slechts een dm7000, maar wel ook een rotor. eigenlijk al een tijdje ook een dm600 en dm7025. Maar nu kijkend met een et9000 en vuduo

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #518 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,062 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 19 March 2014 - 11:04

Het upscalen nog vlekkiger maken als je daar aan sleutelt??

Edited by littlesat, 19 March 2014 - 11:04.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #519 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 24 March 2014 - 09:30

this is added in the drivers since this month...

But what does it do??? there are 2 new configuration items:

 

             "Scaler vertical dejagging"
             "Smooth"
 

pep_scaler_vertical_dejagging = Toggle the vertical scaler dejagging.

smooth = Enable smoothing filter to control the dithering process.

 

You can google for more details. I did, but it seems to be rather complicated stuff and I won't pretend to understand that.

 

And as I said before: you can add this to the video enhancement plugin for all boxes. If the proc entry isn't there, it won't show in the plugin.


Edited by SatKiekerd, 24 March 2014 - 09:30.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #520 mirakels

  • Forum Moderator
    PLi® Core member
  • 7,603 posts

+62
Good

Posted 24 March 2014 - 14:26

Ah, so "Toggle the vertical scaler dejagging." means that dejagging through the vertical scaler is enabled or disabled.

 

So that only leaves the question what does dejagging invole? Googling on 'vertical scaler dejagging' reveals lots of patent documents without much explanation...


Geen wonder... Had slechts een dm7000, maar wel ook een rotor. eigenlijk al een tijdje ook een dm600 en dm7025. Maar nu kijkend met een et9000 en vuduo


11 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users