You could simply arrange that a 1920x1080 skin scales all the loaded fonts with an additional offset.... So for these skins this is not a requirement at all, but something that was not smart made there were these skin(s) are implemented. We likely forbid all those checks for having a 1920x1080 osd in the code and then use other fixed sizes . We solve it a smarter way by letting the skin decide the widths and/or calculate a fixed with by using the by skin configured hights..
But this time, before satkiekerd is pinching here again... I'm the "sailor on the land" as we did not implemented 1920x1080 skins (yet). At these moment I really do not see the advantages as just telling we have a 1920x1080 skin.... It slows down then osd a bit and when sitting on the sofa you do not see the difference anymore.... Too much efford for the gain it offers...
Note when a good graphical skinner is willing to create a 1920x1080 skin for us... I'm willing to help him to change then code for him in a more propper way, by adding new features he needs instead of adding new fixed values depending on then osd mode...
Unless these of topic comments we of course can add sizes to the subs...
Edited by littlesat, 13 December 2014 - 11:13.