Jump to content


Photo

Differences in HDD transfer rate on ET9000 and on 7020HD


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 jpuigs

  • Senior Member
  • 1,143 posts

+32
Good

Posted 7 March 2014 - 16:27

When transfering files from HDD to PC, I get diferent results on a ET9000 and a DM7020HD.

When file is in ET9000 HDD, I get a 11,3 MB/s constant data rate, but if file is in 7020HD, I get a constantly variable speed, like a roller coaster.

 

(Transfers are made separately, I mean not at the same time)

 

 

Look at the pictures, first is from ET9000 , second is from 7020HD

 

niqw.jpg . 5eom.jpg

 

The internal HDDs are:

 

7020HD

WD Blue WDC WD5000AAKX

Product Specifications 
 Interface SATA 6 Gb/s
 
Performance Specifications 
 Rotational Speed 7,200 RPM (nominal)
 Buffer Size 16 MB
 Load/unload Cycles 300,000 minimum
 
Transfer Rates
 Transfer Rate (Buffer To Disk) 126 MB/s (Max)
 
Physical Specifications 
 Formatted Capacity 500,107 MB
 Capacity 500 GB
 Form Factor 3.5 Inch

 

 

ET9000:
 WD Blue WDC WD2500AAKX

Product Specifications 
 Interface SATA 6 Gb/s
 
Performance Specifications 
 Rotational Speed 7,200 RPM (nominal)
 Buffer Size 16 MB
 Load/unload Cycles 300,000 minimum
 
Transfer Rates
 Transfer Rate (Buffer To Disk) 126 MB/s (Max)
 
Physical Specifications 
 Formatted Capacity 250,059 MB
 Capacity 250 GB
 Form Factor 3.5 Inch

 

 

Both STBs are connected to the same switch, which has the Desktop PC connected too.

 

When transfering, both STBs are standby.

 

Why is ET performing better than DM ?


Enigma is getting old....

 

Spoiler

Re: Differences in HDD transfer rate on ET9000 and on 7020HD #2 MiLo

  • PLi® Core member
  • 14,045 posts

+298
Excellent

Posted 7 March 2014 - 19:11

Newer kernel. Better drivers. Or just coincidence.
Real musicians never die - they just decompose


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users