Jump to content


Photo

FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb


  • Please log in to reply
158 replies to this topic

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #61 2boom

  • Senior Member
  • 100 posts

+17
Neutral

Posted 2 May 2014 - 10:46

icons  :)

 

 

Attached Files



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #62 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,328 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 2 May 2014 - 12:07

2boom

+1  :)


Edited by Dima73, 2 May 2014 - 12:08.

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #63 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,176 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 2 May 2014 - 13:49

I tough a long time ago to seperate channellist configs. Give me the ones that should be considered...

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #64 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,328 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 2 May 2014 - 13:54

littlesat

Thanks for the patch, but I can not test it.

For ETx00 not nightly build :( .


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #65 maigais

  • Senior Member
  • 431 posts

+4
Neutral

Posted 3 May 2014 - 06:11

thanks for icon_crypt
but also a large number of channels does not recognize.

channel is switched to display the icon
channel list

Attached Files


Edited by maigais, 3 May 2014 - 06:14.

BlackHole-3.1.0F_DM800 ,Tuner + ALINK DTU & Digital USB DVB-T HDTV TV Tuner Recorder Receiver , HDD TOSHIBA MK2552GSX 250gb,usb 16gb,skins Glamour_X-Infinity mod


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #66 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 3 May 2014 - 18:31

The icons will upgraded while you're zapping.... 
Possibly during scanning something needs still be adjusted (plus some finetuning...)

That 'upgrade on zap' indeed works, and the status survives a reboot. So that's fine!

But we really need the 'upgrade on scan'; without that it's still not very useful. I hope this is still WiP?

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #67 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,176 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 3 May 2014 - 18:35

Upgrade on scan should also work... It is upload from settings that doesn't work...
Fastscan, cable scan and normal scan should push the caids...

Edited by littlesat, 3 May 2014 - 18:36.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #68 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,328 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 3 May 2014 - 20:29

Upgrade on scan should also work... It is upload from settings that doesn't work...
Fastscan, cable scan and normal scan should push the caids...

After normal scan all services FTA


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #69 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 3 May 2014 - 20:38


Upgrade on scan should also work... It is upload from settings that doesn't work...
Fastscan, cable scan and normal scan should push the caids...

After normal scan all services FTA


Yep; I scanned several satellites and no encrypted flags show. That happens only after zapping to a service.

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #70 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,176 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 4 May 2014 - 07:07

Then some code needs to added there... Were are the sources of aaf team?
I saw something was cached there, but probably it is buggy

Edited by littlesat, 4 May 2014 - 07:09.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #71 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 4 May 2014 - 07:30

I have done some more scans, and the results are vary varying. Sometimes some flags show after the scan, sometimes none at all.

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #72 dhwz

  • Senior Member
  • 227 posts

+20
Neutral

Posted 5 May 2014 - 07:57

As stated earlier this doesn't work for all providers on service scan directly, as only some provide the proper flags to detect if the service is encrypted or not.
Else you have to do a PMT-Scan for each service, which would make the scan speed worse.

Edited by dhwz, 5 May 2014 - 07:58.


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #73 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 5 May 2014 - 08:53

As stated earlier this doesn't work for all providers on service scan directly, as only some provide the proper flags to detect if the service is encrypted or not.

But on tuning the flag is always set correctly.

Else you have to do a PMT-Scan for each service, which would make the scan speed worse.

What is a 'PMT scan'? And what is worse about it? Takes long(er)?

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #74 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,621 posts

+30
Good

Posted 5 May 2014 - 09:03

I wouldn't sacrifice scan speed just to have a FTA/encrypted icon.

Just a thought from a normal user.


ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #75 vasilich07

  • Senior Member
  • 155 posts

+4
Neutral

Posted 5 May 2014 - 10:10

I wouldn't sacrifice scan speed just to have a FTA/encrypted icon.

Just a thought from a normal user.

+ 1 :) 


GI ET11000,Vu+DUO2 - 4W-90E Supral 120 (motor Stab  HH 120), 36Е- satellite antenna Nokia - 90

 xtrend ET9000 - Tests without a permanent connection


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #76 Pr2

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 6,181 posts

+261
Excellent

Posted 5 May 2014 - 10:29

Hi,

 

Sounds a good idea to me to have the caid defined while scanning, that's the best time to do so.

 

Is total scanning speed really so important, when you launch a scanning, you never know how long it will last, especially if you enable the auto TP update and while scanning you can't do anything else with the box anyway.

 

I also point out that even if background scanning is set to on, this doesn't update the crypto icons on the services that are on the same TP.

 

Pr2


NO SUPPORT by PM, it is a forum make your question public so everybody can benefit from the question/answer.
If you think that my answer helps you, you can press the up arrow in bottom right of the answer.

Wanna help with OpenPLi Translation? Please read our Wiki Information for translators

Sat: Hotbird 13.0E, Astra 19.2E, Eutelsat5A 5.0W
VU+ Solo 4K: 2*DVB-S2 + 2*DVB-C/T/T2 (used in DVB-C) & Duo 4K: 2*DVB-S2X + DVB-C (FBC)

AB-Com: PULSe 4K 1*DVB-S2X (+ DVB-C/T/T2)
Edision OS Mio 4K: 1*DVB-S2X + 1*DVB-C/T/T2
 


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #77 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 5 May 2014 - 12:21

I wouldn't sacrifice scan speed just to have a FTA/encrypted icon.
Just a thought from a normal user.

Oh, yes, I would. Absolutely!
Also a normal user here (who doesn't want to zap to numerous services only to find out it can't be watched).
But I'm not sure if a scan would really have to take any longer to be thorough?

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #78 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,785 posts

+214
Excellent

Posted 5 May 2014 - 12:45

I wouldn't sacrifice scan speed just to have a FTA/encrypted icon.

Just a thought from a normal user.

 

due one stupid flag sacrifice scan speed ? Do you working with single processor boxes too ? Can somebody tell me, for what it is needed ? Leaving aside if you want your box is as carny's range ;)


Edited by ims, 5 May 2014 - 13:31.

Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #79 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 5 May 2014 - 13:37

The need has been thoroughly explained above.
Encryption flags showing that you can't watch a service, so it saves you from zapping to it and wait in vain.
So this 'stupid flag' provides valuable information.

Edited by SatKiekerd, 5 May 2014 - 13:38.


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #80 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,785 posts

+214
Excellent

Posted 5 May 2014 - 13:40

and why put into bouquets services, which cannot be decoded ?


Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!


7 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users