Jump to content


Photo

FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb


  • Please log in to reply
158 replies to this topic

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #121 dhwz

  • Senior Member
  • 227 posts

+20
Neutral

Posted 8 May 2014 - 16:09

@littlesat

I think here are still some people who just don't understand how it works.  :D

 

@SatKiekerd

Just accept it that it is not working for all services. It's only working for services which have properly set the encryption flag in the SI-Data.

 

And remember dreamboxEDIT supports the encryption flag sice 3 years!!!, thats when DMM added it on my own request on their images.

I will not change anything on the behaviour of dreamboxEDIT as its working as intended. There is no need to edit the encryption flag manually! There isn't even a encryption flag in the lamedb it's just a fake caid C:0000 which is written on service scan. You can edit it manually in the extra parameters, but as said that makes no sense at all.



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #122 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 8 May 2014 - 17:33

1- Does this mean that a FTA-scan will find many encrypted services?

2- I do not accept this behaviour; as it is now I will use the 'auto-zap' plugin for better results. And as tuning does get the correct settings, I'm still convinced that there may be a decent way to scan.

3- I don't understand why DBE doesn't allow for manually changing the flag. After all, DBE allows to change all parameters if you have better ones then the box (or settings file) has. So why not for this parameter?

Of course I realize that we're a big step closer to a perfect box now. But still some work to do (hopefully :) ).

Edited by SatKiekerd, 8 May 2014 - 17:33.


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #123 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,176 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 8 May 2014 - 17:39

1. Yes... I mentioned before...

2. Complaint at all those providers who transmits incorrect "meta" data - Indeed zapping to all channels makes it better... but is also slow... But what about channels that are not always encrypted. It is still an indicator this way,

3. I far I understood you could add/remove CAIDs in DBE


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #124 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 8 May 2014 - 17:56

....But what about channels that are not always encrypted. It is still an indicator this way,

Absolutely, but that's a limitation I can live with. You can't catch 'Dynamic' parameters.

Also strange: BBC 3/4 (SD & HD) show the encrypted flag on a daytime scan; will see if the flag will be reset when the service is active tonight.

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #125 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 8 May 2014 - 19:14

As the person who posted the original feature request I'd like to say thank you to everyone who has been involved in bring it to the stage it is at so far. Well done. :D



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #126 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,328 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 8 May 2014 - 19:16

As the person who posted the original feature request I'd like to say thank you to everyone who has been involved in bring it to the stage it is at so far. Well done. :D

+1 :)


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #127 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 8 May 2014 - 22:38

....But what about channels that are not always encrypted. It is still an indicator this way,

Absolutely, but that's a limitation I can live with. You can't catch 'Dynamic' parameters.

Also strange: BBC 3/4 (SD & HD) show the encrypted flag on a daytime scan; will see if the flag will be reset when the service is active tonight.

No, they don't disappear on tune even though the channels are FTA.



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #128 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 9 May 2014 - 04:31

Hmmm, the flag once set remains in place; and even DBE can't change it.
Now I'm not sure anymore if this feature is useful; at first I was very happy it to be implemented, but the limitations appear to be endless.

I remember my good old Inverto 7000 always showing the correct flag.

Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #129 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,176 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 9 May 2014 - 06:43

Even that invento is not capable at this moment to show it correctly... As the providers made a mess out of it...
Possibly something needs to be added that if a channel is fta the m_ca cache will be cleared....
Does some of our openpli based image also have that in between?
From the beginning I told this is difficult to get right.

Edited by littlesat, 9 May 2014 - 06:46.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #130 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 9 May 2014 - 07:29

Even that invento is not capable at this moment to show it correctly... As the providers made a mess out of it...

OK, that's very well possible indeed; years ago since I last used the Inverto.

 

Possibly something needs to be added that if a channel is fta the m_ca cache will be cleared....

Yes please.

 

Does some of our openpli based image also have that in between?

As far as I know all but Open-SPA followed your changes.
So I'll flash Open-SPA to see how it works there.

 

From the beginning I told this is difficult to get right.

Yep, and a challenge keeps the little grey cells alive and active!



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #131 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 9 May 2014 - 09:02

Hmmm, the flag once set remains in place; and even DBE can't change it.
Now I'm not sure anymore if this feature is useful; at first I was very happy it to be implemented, but the limitations appear to be endless.

I remember my good old Inverto 7000 always showing the correct flag.

Not sure why this warrants a negative reputation????



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #132 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 9 May 2014 - 23:20

strange: BBC 3/4 (SD & HD) show the encrypted flag on a daytime scan; will see if the flag will be reset when the service is active tonight.

Only way to get rid of that for me was manually edit lamedb and then send it back to the receiver (init 4... init 3).



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #133 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,176 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2014 - 06:26

Or from today zap to it...

Edited by littlesat, 10 May 2014 - 06:26.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #134 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2014 - 11:54

Or from today zap to it...

Good. I look forward to testing that.

 

It's a shame there is no way to override this flag  in DBEdit.


Edited by Huevos, 10 May 2014 - 11:54.


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #135 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2014 - 11:59

BTW, what do the changes in scan.cpp do?



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #136 dhwz

  • Senior Member
  • 227 posts

+20
Neutral

Posted 10 May 2014 - 12:23

It's a shame there is no way to override this flag  in DBEdit.

 

What are you talking about???

Again there is no such flag in the lamedb just caids which are cached.



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #137 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2014 - 14:33

What are you talking about???

Ok, scan 28E. 'Clear before scan' = yes.

 

Now the encryption flag shows on BBC3, BBC4, etc.in the channel list but these are FTA channels. Now if I import the channel list into DBEdit I can't see a way to correct those incorrect locked icons.



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #138 dhwz

  • Senior Member
  • 227 posts

+20
Neutral

Posted 10 May 2014 - 19:36

Maybe you should read what I written before? The lock is coming from the cached caids, if you remove the caids the lock is also gone.  :P

 

But somehow some people here just dont' read or still don't understand how the encryption "flag" is working...  :rolleyes:


Edited by dhwz, 10 May 2014 - 19:39.


Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #139 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,662 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 10 May 2014 - 20:54

Maybe you should read what I written before? The lock is coming from the cached caids, if you remove the caids the lock is also gone.  :P

 

But somehow some people here just dont' read or still don't understand how the encryption "flag" is working...  :rolleyes:

Yes we are all aware how it works. So how do you remove the caids in DBEdit?



Re: FTA/Encrypted flag in ServiceScan/lamedb #140 dhwz

  • Senior Member
  • 227 posts

+20
Neutral

Posted 10 May 2014 - 21:24

No comment...

Did you read #121? No you did not...  -_-




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users