Jump to content


Photo

Channel number zap timeout


  • Please log in to reply
45 replies to this topic

Re: Channel number zap timeout #21 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 15:35

No that's not going to work.

But one option will. Something like "short" "medium" and "long".

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: Channel number zap timeout #22 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,120 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 15:40

No that's not going to work.

 

-> Why? It is already working here ;) It automatically adjusts to the current user.... ;)

 

But one option will. Something like "short" "medium" and "long".

--> Sounds also good and easy to implement.... 1000 msec, 2000 msec, 3000 msec... ;)


Edited by littlesat, 13 January 2016 - 15:50.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Channel number zap timeout #23 Meega

  • Senior Member
  • 3,000 posts

+51
Good

Posted 13 January 2016 - 15:52

No that's not going to work.

 

-> Why? It is already working here ;) It automatically adjusts to the current user.... ;)

 

 

Could you explain, how this works on which user?


ET10000+ Openpli 6.1,1m schotel 4x duo-lnb op vaste opstelling.

Momolights teensy 2.0 met 50 leds op een string ,150 channels
DM8000 Openpli 6.1 Release


Re: Channel number zap timeout #24 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,120 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 16:46

It will measure the time between the first and second press... this by using a 250 msec timer

 

Then it calculates a next delay on the following function..

 

self.targeted_time_count = repeated_key and self.time_count < 6 and [4,4,4,5,6,8,10][self.time_count] or 12

 

minimal 1 sec delay.... max 3 seconds and when you are a slow presser it will adjust to 3 seconds or something else from a small table...

 

There is no user setting... all depends on the first (and following) presses... Each time there is an additional margin added.... minimal it stays also 1 second... max 3 seconds....


Edited by littlesat, 13 January 2016 - 16:57.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Channel number zap timeout #25 Meega

  • Senior Member
  • 3,000 posts

+51
Good

Posted 13 January 2016 - 18:17

It will measure the time between the first and second press... this by using a 250 msec timer

 

Then it calculates a next delay on the following function..

 

self.targeted_time_count = repeated_key and self.time_count < 6 and [4,4,4,5,6,8,10][self.time_count] or 12

 

minimal 1 sec delay.... max 3 seconds and when you are a slow presser it will adjust to 3 seconds or something else from a small table...

 

There is no user setting... all depends on the first (and following) presses... Each time there is an additional margin added.... minimal it stays also 1 second... max 3 seconds....

Ok ,but that means then, that when you zap to 1-9 it always takes the longest time?


ET10000+ Openpli 6.1,1m schotel 4x duo-lnb op vaste opstelling.

Momolights teensy 2.0 met 50 leds op een string ,150 channels
DM8000 Openpli 6.1 Release


Re: Channel number zap timeout #26 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 18:26

Even a long fixed time out will work; the 'younger people' just push 'OK' after the last digit and zapping takes place immediately.



Re: Channel number zap timeout #27 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,781 posts

+214
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 19:26

Even a long fixed time out will work; the 'younger people' just push 'OK' after the last digit and zapping takes place immediately.

I am never pressing OK, f.eg. ...

But one option will. Something like "short" "medium" and "long". 

It could be ok and place it to setting for RC, where is delay and repeat .


Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!

Re: Channel number zap timeout #28 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,120 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 19:31

I prefer no additional config... so let's see what I pushed just a few moments ago might help....


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Channel number zap timeout #29 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 20:22

Even a long fixed time out will work; the 'younger people' just push 'OK' after the last digit and zapping takes place immediately.

I am never pressing OK, f.eg. ...

You don't have to, but you can. Just to speed up zapping.

Edited by Rob van der Does, 13 January 2016 - 20:23.


Re: Channel number zap timeout #30 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,781 posts

+214
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 20:50

 

 

Even a long fixed time out will work; the 'younger people' just push 'OK' after the last digit and zapping takes place immediately.

I am never pressing OK, f.eg. ...

 

You don't have to, but you can. Just to speed up zapping.

 

I know ... I am using zap from list


Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!

Re: Channel number zap timeout #31 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 13 January 2016 - 22:11

Hehe, me too....

Re: Channel number zap timeout #32 Tony il Capo

  • Senior Member
  • 96 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 January 2016 - 22:51

Many of us zap from channel list, it's better, I have no idea what numbers channels have, when I use number keys I have to press OK too, because I think that it takes too much time to zap!

 

We have fast fingers - we are used to tablets, pcs, smartphones-  but for people without experience with this stuff, especially older people, they are used to older and more basic stbs, they have always pressed remote control numbers to switch channel.

 

As my experience goes, it was just a couple years ago that analog signal was shut off here. So people were used to have 4 channels (only 4 fta national channels!). They've used 1-4 keys, so it was easy for them... When digital came, receivers, both terrestrial and satellite (for national TV), were not so different, no big changes. When I started my adventure on enigma STBs, I had to put national channels in the very first bouquet, so that channel number would stay the same for my mother be able to watch tv as she was used to. If she needed to press more than one key, the box would zap to the wrong channel, because she is really slow with just finding one key.

 

Long story short, for older and inexperienced people would be nice to have longer timeouts and/or an option for being able to customize that. Channel zap is crucial for everybody, they may have no idea how the stb works, but if they can switch channels, it's all good!


Edited by Tony il Capo, 13 January 2016 - 22:53.

DVBS Tuner (satfinder only) || GI Avatar 2 2xDVBS2 (spark162_SH4) ||Vu+ Zero || Vu+ Duo2 4xDVBS2 1TB HD || OpenATV 6.0

0,6m+(0.8m)+0,9m+1,2m Multi feed @13ºE, 19.2ºE, 28.3ºE, 30W

Samsung 32" HDTV || 2.1 Trust Tytan

Win 10 x64 || FX8350 || 8GB RAM || MSI Gaming GTX970 || ASUS VP278H 27" || Trust Tytan 2.1 || Logitech G29

Raspberry PI 3 Model B || Samsung S22c300 21.5"

TPLINK WR1043NDv2  running LEDE || OpenVPN >=< LAN||  Lt26i Custom Android


Re: Channel number zap timeout #33 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,299 posts

+347
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 00:09

Ver 1.0-rc13
 Extended NumberZap Plugin for Enigma2

 

-Setting milliseconds first pressing key
-Setting number of digits
-Support Full-HD skin
-fix picon for alternative channels


Edited by Dimitrij, 14 January 2016 - 00:10.

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: Channel number zap timeout #34 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 06:54

So again a plugin instead of a configuration setting :(
PLi relies on far too many plugins to make the image workable.

Edited by Rob van der Does, 14 January 2016 - 06:55.


Re: Channel number zap timeout #35 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,120 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 07:27

Why make comfigs if you can do it automatically....

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Channel number zap timeout #36 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 10:23

What will the 'automated lag' be when only one digit is required to zap? So when the active fav-list has max 9 services?

Re: Channel number zap timeout #37 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,120 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 11:55

You can make 1000 configs.... but with 1000 configs also nobody can get it optimized... and you create more chaos and you need more spaghetti code to get all the configs supported...

 

I think it is fine as it is now.... Nobody needs to config... To speedup you still have the OK button.... And when you press buttons quickly, you also get with less digits quick response...  You can always type more digits when you want (not limited to max digits by a setting).... No configs required... Less complicated.... The slow presser's issue from this topic is addressed.... Most people happy...

 

I still convinced some "other" images want to put as many configs in their image as possible... I think at least this is not a good approach... You must try to avoid configs as we have already in our image(s).... But I realize sometimes this requires compromises....


Edited by littlesat, 14 January 2016 - 12:02.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Channel number zap timeout #38 Tony il Capo

  • Senior Member
  • 96 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 14 January 2016 - 12:47

You can make 1000 configs.... but with 1000 configs also nobody can get it optimized... and you create more chaos and you need more spaghetti code to get all the configs supported...

 

I think it is fine as it is now.... Nobody needs to config... To speedup you still have the OK button.... And when you press buttons quickly, you also get with less digits quick response...  You can always type more digits when you want (not limited to max digits by a setting).... No configs required... Less complicated.... The slow presser's issue from this topic is addressed.... Most people happy...

 

I still convinced some "other" images want to put as many configs in their image as possible... I think at least this is not a good approach... You must try to avoid configs as we have already in our image(s).... But I realize sometimes this requires compromises....

You created the fix, so you're happy with it because it does not really matters to you.

 

When you guys argue so much to not install any plugins and then put out of configs a simple option to configure it to user taste, I think it's really bad.

Like Rob says, going like this, more and more plugins will be needed.


DVBS Tuner (satfinder only) || GI Avatar 2 2xDVBS2 (spark162_SH4) ||Vu+ Zero || Vu+ Duo2 4xDVBS2 1TB HD || OpenATV 6.0

0,6m+(0.8m)+0,9m+1,2m Multi feed @13ºE, 19.2ºE, 28.3ºE, 30W

Samsung 32" HDTV || 2.1 Trust Tytan

Win 10 x64 || FX8350 || 8GB RAM || MSI Gaming GTX970 || ASUS VP278H 27" || Trust Tytan 2.1 || Logitech G29

Raspberry PI 3 Model B || Samsung S22c300 21.5"

TPLINK WR1043NDv2  running LEDE || OpenVPN >=< LAN||  Lt26i Custom Android


Re: Channel number zap timeout #39 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,299 posts

+347
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 13:12

There is a solution.
Just use the plugin.
I do not see any problems :) .


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: Channel number zap timeout #40 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 14 January 2016 - 13:58

@ Littlesat: again, how is your 'automated delay' going to work for a one-digit channel zap? The 'slow people' we're talking about here are not being helped by the option to use the OK-button to speed things up.




7 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users