Moin,
ich habe eine VU+ Solo 4k und ein paar Fragen:
1. Geht das CI+ Modul von Sky mit OpenPLI?
2. Liegt eine Oscam Version für die Solo 4k auf dem Feed?
3. Läuft das Image stabile mit der Solo 4k?
VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen!
Started by Yiruma, 04 Jun 2016 07:34
13 replies to this topic
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #2
-
- Senior Member
- 7,766 posts
+184
Excellent
Posted 4 June 2016 - 14:09
1- Nein
2- Ja
3- Ja
Aber sicherlich hast du das mittlerweile mal selber versucht
2- Ja
3- Ja
Aber sicherlich hast du das mittlerweile mal selber versucht
Edited by Rob van der Does, 4 June 2016 - 14:10.
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #3
-
- Senior Member
- 85 posts
+1
Neutral
Posted 4 June 2016 - 17:27
Moin,
ohne CI+ für mich leider nicht zu gebrauchen.
Schade 
Gruß Yiruma
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #4
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,176 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 4 June 2016 - 20:44
Frage VU mahl ob die CI+ veilleicht richtig machen moechten...
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #5
-
- Senior Member
- 7,766 posts
+184
Excellent
Posted 5 June 2016 - 06:29
Wie GigaBlue das gemacht hat: die haben eine Lizenz für CI+!Frage VU mahl ob die CI+ veilleicht richtig machen moechten...
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #6
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,176 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 5 June 2016 - 08:39
How GigaBlue has made: that have a license for CI +!
This is still very a doubtfull story...
E.g. HD2400 made a good implementation that does not validate the E2 rules...
Edited by littlesat, 5 June 2016 - 08:41.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #7
-
- Senior Member
- 1,128 posts
+34
Good
Posted 5 June 2016 - 09:08
Hi,
Wie GigaBlue das gemacht hat: die haben eine Lizenz für CI+!Frage VU mahl ob die CI+ veilleicht richtig machen moechten...
CI+ weiß da aber nichts von. Bei "CI Plus licensed customers" finde ich keinen E2-Hersteller.
ciao
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #8
-
- Senior Member
- 7,766 posts
+184
Excellent
Posted 5 June 2016 - 10:56
You mean they don't use a binary, but supply the sources instead?E.g. HD2400 made a good implementation that does not validate the E2 rules...
Du meinst die benützen nicht eine 'Binary', aber die überlegen die 'Source Files'?
Edited by Rob van der Does, 5 June 2016 - 10:57.
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #9
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,176 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 5 June 2016 - 11:00
Read what was told before.... It seems we're getting in the same discussion again...
At least I can say that there are a lot of image violating the GPL stuff... But I think they do not bother as likely CI+ support has a higher priority than GPL.
Edited by littlesat, 5 June 2016 - 11:01.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #10
-
- Senior Member
- 7,766 posts
+184
Excellent
Posted 5 June 2016 - 11:05
Read what was told before.... It seems we're getting in the same discussion again...
Ich bin nicht sicher welche Diskussion du meinst; vielleicht eine Link?
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #11
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,176 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 5 June 2016 - 11:27
CI+ discussions in the past.... Sorry as for me search is your frend...
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #13
-
- PLi® Core member
- 7,185 posts
+323
Excellent
Posted 12 June 2016 - 08:53
The VU solo4k OpenPli image doesn't support CI+. There is a solution(as it works in other images), but it violates GPL. So OpenPli cannot use it.
Xtrend ET-9200, ET-8000, ET-10000, OpenPliPC on Ubuntu 12.04
Re: VU+ Solo 4k, einige Fragen! #14
-
- PLi® Core member
- 57,176 posts
+698
Excellent
Posted 12 June 2016 - 08:58
In fact the others can also not usu it without violating the licenses....
Edited by littlesat, 12 June 2016 - 08:59.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
