Jump to content


Photo

lamedb or lamedb5 ?


  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

#1 ngc1927

  • Member
  • 17 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 11 November 2016 - 12:41

I install last openpli maked from git for my zgemma h2 ..now have big problem ..my old channel list is in lamedb format and with this new i see only n/a in favorite list.

Question: is possible convert old lamedb in new lamedb5 ? ..and why not automatic convert old lamedb in new lamedb5 ? ..which channel editor have to use?

 

Thx all.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #2 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,616 posts

+30
Good

Posted 11 November 2016 - 15:03

As far as I know, lamedb is still used.


ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #3 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,244 posts

+158
Excellent

Posted 12 November 2016 - 20:00

lamedb is used. It can contain either format.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #4 Dimmie

  • Senior Member
  • 2,338 posts

+33
Good

Posted 12 November 2016 - 23:16

I use Dreamset to put old channellist with only lamedb into new PLi and works just fine.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #5 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,244 posts

+158
Excellent

Posted 12 November 2016 - 23:35

Hopefully it changes soon, so it writes whatever format it reads.

 

Right now there doesn't seem much point. i.e. if lamedb is in V5 format it reads it in fine at boot time,,, and then writes out in V4 at shutdown... crazy.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #6 XoXo_

  • Senior Member
  • 25 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 14:17

Using Dreamset today to upload the new channel list the same way as every time i do.

So my channel list display N/A everywhere...

Is there a way to solve this?

 

latest openly on et9200



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #7 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 14:47

Delete lamedb5 and see if that fixes your problem.
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #8 XoXo_

  • Senior Member
  • 25 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 14:50

already did that... same problem

transferring the settings while e2 is down, then reboot - also no effect...

the channel names in lamedb5 seem correct, but nothing shown in channel selection menu



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #9 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 14:51

Show an example maybe your settings use new field source_id?
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #10 XoXo_

  • Senior Member
  • 25 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 14:56

Here they are.

Attached Files


Edited by XoXo_, 13 November 2016 - 14:57.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #11 Pr2

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 6,070 posts

+257
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 15:14

Are you sure that there is no changes from your TV provider?  French provider Canal update some channels on the 8th november, so some channels have changed (channels swap) and others are now n/a.


NO SUPPORT by PM, it is a forum make your question public so everybody can benefit from the question/answer.
If you think that my answer helps you, you can press the up arrow in bottom right of the answer.

Wanna help with OpenPLi Translation? Please read our Wiki Information for translators

Sat: Hotbird 13.0E, Astra 19.2E, Eutelsat5A 5.0W
VU+ Solo 4K: 2*DVB-S2 + 2*DVB-C/T/T2 (used in DVB-C) & Duo 4K: 2*DVB-S2X + DVB-C (FBC)

AB-Com: PULSe 4K 1*DVB-S2X (+ DVB-C/T/T2)
Edision OS Mio 4K: 1*DVB-S2X + 1*DVB-C/T/T2
 


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #12 XoXo_

  • Senior Member
  • 25 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 15:20

I'm using vhannibal settings to assemble my custom list every month. Everything was ok today since i uploaded the new ones. I do this the same way for years.

Strange thing is when i start reading settings from the receiver via Dreamset Editor, settings come just fine into the program.


Edited by XoXo_, 13 November 2016 - 15:21.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #13 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 15:26

end
services
03f4:018630ec:0001:0001:1:4
NOVA
p:BULSATCOM,f:0040
03f2:018630ec:0001:0001:1:11
TV Plus
p:BULSATCOM,f:0040
03f3:018630ec:0001:0001:1:18
F Plus
p:BULSATCOM,f:0040
03f5:018630ec:0001:0001:1:24
In the above list the last field now it's source_id.

end
services
03f4:018630ec:0001:0001:1:0
NOVA
p:BULSATCOM,f:0040
03f2:018630ec:0001:0001:1:0
TV Plus
p:BULSATCOM,f:0040
03f3:018630ec:0001:0001:1:0
F Plus
p:BULSATCOM,f:0040
03f5:018630ec:0001:0001:1:0
I change them to zero, with that change the N/A is fixed?
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #14 XoXo_

  • Senior Member
  • 25 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 16:06

Yep. This solves it, but how to convert my whole channel list? And why?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #15 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 16:17

That field was know as available field, so when ATSC developed recently an extra field was required.

As you can undrestand the available field was used.

BUT (damn, there is always a but), it seems that source_id wasn't available field, it is used by several projects, and nobody ever document this with a comment, in order to avoid use of that field.

A solution should be found.
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #16 XoXo_

  • Senior Member
  • 25 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 16:30

Thanks athoik! I'll try to manually edit my settings, but what about all the different channel editing software using this field?


Edited by XoXo_, 13 November 2016 - 16:30.


Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #17 dax

  • Senior Member
  • 228 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 13 November 2016 - 18:54

Same issue for me: vhannibal setting with enigmedit. I will wait for a fix.



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #18 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,244 posts

+158
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 20:35


In the above list the last field now it's source_id.

 

What do you mean "source_id"?



Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #19 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 13 November 2016 - 20:39

See:

https://github.com/O...df5d45a1b45f212
https://github.com/O...4cf8e0facdfe019
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: lamedb or lamedb5 ? #20 Dimmie

  • Senior Member
  • 2,338 posts

+33
Good

Posted 13 November 2016 - 23:10

Using Dreamset today to upload the new channel list the same way as every time i do.

So my channel list display N/A everywhere...

Is there a way to solve this?

 

latest openly on et9200

 

 

I know in the past with some brands of decoders also N/A was displayed. Then after doing an automatic scan the N/A was gone. Maybe this is also the solution nowadays ? I cannot test it since my receivers don't have this problem.


Edited by Dimmie, 13 November 2016 - 23:10.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users