Jump to content


Photo

MediaPortal


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 tappari

  • Senior Member
  • 121 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 27 February 2017 - 07:18

I just flashed my ET10000 with OpenPLi because ATV and ViX both jam if trying to use Sundtek C/T2 tuners. Obvious problem is a bug in 4.8.3 kernel they are using. PLi with kernel 4.0.1 works fine. But where is MediaPortal? Not in plugins. I tried to install manually 8.0.3 using --force--depends without succsess.



Re: MediaPortal #2 Satpal

  • Senior Member
  • 299 posts

+4
Neutral

Posted 27 February 2017 - 14:47

There are quite a few threads around here with issues installing Mediaportal. What result did you get, especially which error messages? Probably you need to install some additional python files like python-argparse and a few others. After it's working once it will update fine automatically.



Re: MediaPortal #3 tappari

  • Senior Member
  • 121 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 27 February 2017 - 15:13

I receive this:

 

Attached Files



Re: MediaPortal #4 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,559 posts

+1,737
Excellent

Posted 27 February 2017 - 15:30

Chances are the package has invalid or incomplete dependencies.  Unlike some other images OpenPLi only installs what is required, not everything that might possibly be needed in the future.

 

Assuming MediaPortal is not going to fix their errors, you'll have to figure out what the missing dependencies are, and install them yourself, like @Satpal wrote.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: MediaPortal #5 tappari

  • Senior Member
  • 121 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2017 - 11:42

That is not what I want to do. Maybe just better wait for the fix with kernel in ATV and ViX images. 



Re: MediaPortal #6 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,262 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 11:45

Somewhere else on this forum someone posted a working MediaPortal.....


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: MediaPortal #7 tappari

  • Senior Member
  • 121 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2017 - 15:49

Somewhere else on this forum someone posted a working MediaPortal.....

But you don`t want to tell where?



Re: MediaPortal #8 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 17:06

 

Somewhere else on this forum someone posted a working MediaPortal.....

But you don`t want to tell where?

 

Well actually Mediaportal is now written to use gstreamer 1.0 and pli 4.xxx uses gstreamer 0.1.xxx . Do not even try .

 

Media portal is a very very good written and working plugin but you can't work with medieval gstreamer version and Modern Mediaportal. 



Re: MediaPortal #9 tappari

  • Senior Member
  • 121 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2017 - 17:46

So what you mean is that PLi is using gstreamer 0.10.36 while for example ViX is using gstreamer 1.9.0 ?



Re: MediaPortal #10 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,262 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 17:47

How do you know it is very good written... did you see some source code? If so, where are they?

At least the files it puts on your box clearly identify some loss of structure. But I know it is a plugin to play (doubtful) streams... all (doubtful) streams played better with newer gstreamer Openpli 5 has....

Edited by littlesat, 28 February 2017 - 17:48.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: MediaPortal #11 tappari

  • Senior Member
  • 121 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2017 - 18:17

How do you know it is very good written... did you see some source code? If so, where are they?

At least the files it puts on your box clearly identify some loss of structure. But I know it is a plugin to play (doubtful) streams... all (doubtful) streams played better with newer gstreamer Openpli 5 has....

The thing is that I don`t care how it`s written. I care if I can use it with the image I`m using.



Re: MediaPortal #12 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,262 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 18:22

And you can use it... search this forum...! So what's the issue... the tiny manual work?

Edited by littlesat, 28 February 2017 - 18:23.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: MediaPortal #13 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 18:31

How do you know it is very good written... did you see some source code? If so, where are they?

At least the files it puts on your box clearly identify some loss of structure. But I know it is a plugin to play (doubtful) streams... all (doubtful) streams played better with newer gstreamer Openpli 5 has....

I'm currently using openatv , And yes the mediaportal is running by 100 % there . And this on the stable 5.3 version which is usig gstreamer 1.8.3 , But now also it works perfect on the non official(well limited to the beta tester team members) published beta version opentav-6.0  with the very last gstreamer (head) 1.11.2.xx

 

But media portal since long has been updated fot gst-1.0 or aboth, not that it maybe can be made workable for lower gst version but the maintainers do not take care or disregard all issues concerning gstreamer below 1.0 now ,

Since they are working with oe-alliance of which the stable image since long has a gstreamer version a both 1.0 they look at that . So yes I know , and Mediaportal works very very good.



Re: MediaPortal #14 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,262 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 19:32

See https://forums.openp...iaportal/page-5 post #83... when someone makes an ipk of it we can end this discussion....


WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: MediaPortal #15 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,559 posts

+1,737
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 19:35

If it is not available as source, does it have a license that permits us to use it?


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: MediaPortal #16 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,262 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 19:39

Good point Looks it may only be used on DMM boxes...... There is only one exeption... VTI may use it for VU boxes....

 

Sounds like teams that offer it in their streams different from DMM boxes are voilating it's license.... (except VTI of course)....

 

Sounds it might be better someone develop a totally different and real GPL alternative....

 


This plugin is open source but it is NOT free software.
 
This plugin may only be distributed to and executed on hardware which
is licensed by Dream Property GmbH. This includes commercial distribution.
In other words:
It's NOT allowed to distribute any parts of this plugin or its source code in ANY way
to hardware which is NOT licensed by Dream Property GmbH.
It's NOT allowed to execute this plugin and its source code or even parts of it in ANY way
on hardware which is NOT licensed by Dream Property GmbH.
 
This applies to the source code as a whole as well as to parts of it, unless
explicitely stated otherwise.
 
If you want to use or modify the code or parts of it,
you have to keep OUR license and inform us about the modifications, but it may NOT be
commercially distributed other than under the conditions noted above.
 
As an exception regarding execution on hardware, you are permitted to execute this plugin on VU+ hardware
which is licensed by satco europe GmbH, if the VTi image is used on that hardware.
 
As an exception regarding modifcations, you are NOT permitted to remove
any copy protections implemented in this plugin or change them for means of disabling
or working around the copy protections, unless the change has been explicitly permitted
by the original authors. Also decompiling and modification of the closed source
parts is NOT permitted.
 
Advertising with this plugin is NOT allowed.
For other uses, permission from the authors is necessary.

Edited by littlesat, 28 February 2017 - 19:44.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: MediaPortal #17 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,559 posts

+1,737
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 19:42

Very weird license. Why only in VTI? Is that because of the court case between them and DMM?


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: MediaPortal #18 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,262 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 19:48

I think it is now clear for everyone why we do not have it in our feeds..... The zip in post #83 in the other thread can only be used on DMM boxes.....


Edited by littlesat, 28 February 2017 - 19:48.

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: MediaPortal #19 Geradus

  • Senior Member
  • 97 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 28 February 2017 - 20:46

Try this, it works fine on a Xtrend here.

 

https://board.newnig...-x-x/?pageNo=58


Edited by Geradus, 28 February 2017 - 20:46.


Re: MediaPortal #20 christophecvr

  • Senior Member
  • 3,131 posts

+140
Excellent

Posted 28 February 2017 - 21:25

Hi yes licensing issues are important, but by openatv it is avbl to all boxes and the developers are even helping so ...

 

But indeed somehow You could come into troubles, However the license line mentioned on :

 

https://forums.openp...ndpost&p=676461

 

Is pure crap, when it really comes to a court case (at last higher court ) It will be wiped out and marked as crap, that it is. Then obviously some rules will have to be followed further on for the case and those will be GPL wich version that's another point but it will be GPL .




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users