Jump to content


Photo

Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream


  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #21 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,559 posts

+1,737
Excellent

Posted 17 July 2017 - 16:30

It is. The R/C has been downloadable for test for about two weeks now.

 

Once all the reported issues are fixed (and probably when all "key players" are back from being lazy on a beach somehere) we'll make it an official release.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #22 dhwz

  • Senior Member
  • 227 posts

+20
Neutral

Posted 18 July 2017 - 11:52

@WanWizard
FYI its not closed source. But yes you are right you can't add it to your feed without violating our license. Most just don't care, nevertheless they won't get aby support.

Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #23 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,559 posts

+1,737
Excellent

Posted 18 July 2017 - 13:08

We don't, we accept the license, how weird and unfair they may be. Unfortunately, we don't really care, it is the end-user who suffers from the decision to put this kind of license on it.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #24 moli87

  • Senior Member
  • 53 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 4 August 2017 - 19:52

What is the next OpenPli Image? OpenPLi 6? Why not 5?



Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #25 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 4 August 2017 - 21:30

Because 5 released only for devs.

Why are you paying so much attention in numbers?

I guess it would be better to name releases (like the old days, eg pli jade :))

Edited by athoik, 4 August 2017 - 21:31.

Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #26 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 56,260 posts

+691
Excellent

Posted 4 August 2017 - 22:04

Why did windows skip windows 9?

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: Patch... add ?duration=xx to the URL so we can force a stream #27 Rick Hunter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 9,051 posts

+56
Good

Posted 5 August 2017 - 10:24

What is the next OpenPli Image? OpenPLi 6? Why not 5?

 

See: https://wiki.openpli.org/Releasenotes

 

OpenPLi 5 was not released to the public, because we used it for our development to make OpenPLi 6.

 

 


Plinux member We have a.. (ehmm.. morgage) house.


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users