Jump to content


Photo

vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken


  • Please log in to reply
95 replies to this topic

Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #81 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 18 July 2017 - 18:27

Do we really need yet another specific plugin? Can't this be solved by including some terrestrial.xml?


Edited by Erik Slagter, 18 July 2017 - 18:28.

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #82 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,497 posts

+1,810
Excellent

Posted 18 July 2017 - 18:39

Apperantly not, see what Huovos wrote about it.

 

We seem to already have the plugin, but we don't have the xml.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #83 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 18 July 2017 - 19:42

IMO, plugin is fine in the feeds. People can download it if it suits their needs. For most people using the correct xml solves most problems. Abu can submit a PR for the xml.



Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #84 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 18 July 2017 - 19:54

Regarding VU+ Ultimo4k we are missing that http://code.vuplus.c...08b1be40756fbd4


Maybe somebody should ping VU+ to add the change to BSP layer?
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #85 Abu Baniaz

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 2,498 posts

+64
Good

Posted 18 July 2017 - 22:33

I have submitted the pull request.

https://github.com/O...penPLi-1/pull/2

 

I think you guys should change where that file is stored. "The old engima1 base environment". You have two file Changelog/changelog. This comes up as a commit for those of us who use Windows.

OE-A one is here

https://github.com/oe-alliance/oe-alliance-tuxbox-common


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #86 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 19 July 2017 - 09:33

Applied.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #87 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,497 posts

+1,810
Excellent

Posted 19 July 2017 - 14:29

We probably should move the xml's to a separate repo, to cut the dependency on the old CDK repo. It also makes it easier for people to issue a PR on them for updates.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #88 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 19 July 2017 - 20:01

Applied.

Another PR here so users don't end up scanning the wrong region after there is an xml file update.

https://github.com/O...igma2/pull/1050



Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #89 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 20 July 2017 - 13:24

Applied by Littlesat.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #90 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 20 July 2017 - 15:30

Thanks



Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #91 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 20 July 2017 - 15:32

Also, I'm a bit confused. Even though there is a cables.xml it is not being installed in the image. So one of the makefiles must be missing this?



Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #92 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 20 July 2017 - 16:27

Which image (type)?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #93 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 20 July 2017 - 17:10

Good question. Is tuxbox not the same in PLi 4, PLi develop and Pli RC?



Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #94 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 20 July 2017 - 20:04

Not anymore, since yesterday :o

 

"master" / OpenPLi 4 still gets it the usual way

"develop" and "rc-6.0" get them via a new, dedicated repository that I announced yesterday and as such have had a version jump. Also the "new" tuxbox-common package has the "tuxbox-links" package merged into it, so that package has gone.


Edited by Erik Slagter, 20 July 2017 - 20:05.

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #95 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 21 July 2017 - 09:13

We probably should move the xml's to a separate repo, to cut the dependency on the old CDK repo. It also makes it easier for people to issue a PR on them for updates.

Done ;)


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: vu+ solo 4k & dvb-t2 = broken #96 veskop

  • Senior Member
  • 364 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 23 July 2017 - 08:38

Hi,I have brand new Solo4K with new DVB-C/T tuner (TT2L08) whitch I try to use for my cabel provider here in Bulgaria.The problem is,that it doesnt work.I can see tuner in Settings,I can see signal stretch,when I connect my cable,but screen keeps black?Receiver show error :No data on transponder(Tineout reading PAT).I tryed all types of scan-manual,full,cable scanbut NOTHING,it say No channels found or Scan Failed (on cable scan)Allso tryed all possible image -OPENATV,OPENPLI,PBH,BH,PBNIGMA(up-to-date) but have the same problem.I put my channel list from my GB Quad,where everithing was OK but result is the same-black screen!Cable is OK,I revert my GB Quad and everything is OK,when I put Solo 4K,there is no picture.Allso replace original file cables.xml with my from Gigablue-again nothing!Any advise?Thanks!

 


Gigablue Quad +250GB HDD ~ Xtrend ET5000 ~ Triax110 Black Multifeed 36E/28E/23E ~ Total TV88 Multifeed 19E/16E/13E/9-7E ~ EMP Centauri 9/1 DiSEqC ~ Panasonic L42G20



2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users