Jump to content


Photo

Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2740 replies to this topic

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #721 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 11:57

Your code has been rated at 4.12/10 (previous run: -5.44/10, +9.56)
And this is after I dealt with all spaces and tabs indentation issues. Is our code this crap, or it the linter this crap?  :angry:


And that's the sad truth...

Trying to make code PEP friendly wasn't on our list.

Edited by athoik, 21 April 2018 - 11:57.

Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #722 starz

  • Senior Member
  • 59 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 21 April 2018 - 12:01

DEBUG: Executing python function extend_recipe_sysroot
NOTE: Direct dependencies are ['/home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/quilt/quilt-native_0.65.bb:do_populate_sysroot']
NOTE: 
NOTE: quilt-native exists in sysroot, skipping
DEBUG: Python function extend_recipe_sysroot finished
DEBUG: Executing python function do_patch
DEBUG: Executing python function patch_do_patch
DEBUG: Searching for directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch in paths:
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/openpli
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/openpli
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/openpli
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/wetekplay2
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/wetekplay2
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/wetekplay2
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/aml8726
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/aml8726
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/aml8726
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/
DEBUG: Searching for configurefix.patch in paths:
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/openpli
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/openpli
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/openpli
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/wetekplay2
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/wetekplay2
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/wetekplay2
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/aml8726
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/aml8726
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/aml8726
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/aarch64
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb-1.4.12/
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/
    /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/files/
NOTE: Applying patch 'directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch' (../pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb/directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch)
ERROR: Command Error: 'quilt --quiltrc /home/starz/open/openpli-oe-core/build/tmp/work/aarch64-oe-linux/directfb/1.4.12-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/etc/quiltrc push' exited with 0  Output:
Applying patch directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch
patching file directfb-internal.pc.in
patching file directfb.pc.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 9.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file directfb.pc.in
patching file lib/fusion/fusion.pc.in
patching file lib/voodoo/voodoo.pc.in
Patch directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
DEBUG: Python function patch_do_patch finished
DEBUG: Python function do_patch finished
ERROR: Function failed: patch_do_patch

got this error when trying to compile wetekplay2. how can I fix this?



Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #723 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,347 posts

+1,804
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 12:03

lol.

 

Ok, just checking that I'm not crazy then... ;)


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #724 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,347 posts

+1,804
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 12:12

BTW, you know Travis CI now fails on every push for gcc 4.9 and gcc 5, because of the cppflag C++11 that was added to develop?


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #725 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 12:19

BTW, you know Travis CI now fails on every push for gcc 4.9 and gcc 5, because of the cppflag C++11 that was added to develop?


GCC 4.9 has support for C++ 11 (see: https://travis-ci.or...uilds/369464028)

Edited by athoik, 21 April 2018 - 12:20.

Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #726 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,347 posts

+1,804
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 12:25

Hmm... Typical Travis madeness again then...


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #727 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 13:15

Travis CI is not checking for python runtime errors (Although I have it ready on my GitHub fork).

That's not Travis' fault, it's the fault of those ****** interpreted languages. You never know what you're going to end up once the program is started.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #728 jenseneverest

  • Senior Member
  • 65 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 21 April 2018 - 13:22

im getting a similar issue, pi zero

Initialising tasks: 100% |#######################################| Time: 0:01:06
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
ERROR: directfb-1.4.12-r0 do_patch: Command Error: 'quilt --quiltrc /home/jason/openpli/openpli-oe-core/build/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-oe-linux-gnueabi/directfb/1.4.12-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/etc/quiltrc push' exited with 0  Output:
Applying patch directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch
patching file directfb-internal.pc.in
patching file directfb.pc.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 9.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file directfb.pc.in
patching file lib/fusion/fusion.pc.in
patching file lib/voodoo/voodoo.pc.in
Patch directfb-1.2.x-fix-pkgconfig-cflags.patch does not apply (enforce with -f)
ERROR: directfb-1.4.12-r0 do_patch: Function failed: patch_do_patch
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /home/jason/openpli/openpli-oe-core/build/tmp/work/arm1176jzfshf-vfp-oe-linux-gnueabi/directfb/1.4.12-r0/temp/log.do_patch.24692
ERROR: Task (/home/jason/openpli/openpli-oe-core/pli-extras/meta-fulan/recipes-graphics/directfb/directfb_1.4.12.bb:do_patch) failed with exit code '1'
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 448 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and 1 failed.



Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #729 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,347 posts

+1,804
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 13:29

Most programme languages have solutions to check them.

 

The problem with python is that it leaves the result, a pyc, behind, and I haven't found a solution to delete it after a compile.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #730 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 13:47

The problem is that there is no way to make sure all of the code has been seen, ever. For that an explicit syntax checker would be better, but that won't catch all sorts of errors that may occur during runtime. And there are the quasi- and not-quasi self-modifying-code constructs of interpreted languages and the Python people are actually proud of it...


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #731 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 14:43

The latest code enigma2 doesn't run anymore on Travis CI (using my modified .travis.yml that starts enigma2 in order to check for runtime errors).

Backtrace:
enigma2(handleFatalSignal(int, siginfo_t*, void*)) [0x47D869]
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(n/a) [0xC32C4330]
enigma2(PSignal::get()) [0x571C40]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx) [0xC468D843]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCodeEx) [0xC468FC8D]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(n/a) [0xC468FE20]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyObject_Call) [0xC46640F3]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(n/a) [0xC4608DBD]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyObject_Call) [0xC46640F3]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords) [0xC46F7647]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyInstance_New) [0xC4634088]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyObject_Call) [0xC46640F3]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalFrameEx) [0xC468B326]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0(PyEval_EvalCodeEx) [0xC468FC8D]

Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #732 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 70,347 posts

+1,804
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 14:45

Compiling a python file does do a full syntax check, otherwise you can't compile it. Catching runtime errors at compile time is very complicated, especially if they are logic errors, even C/C++ can't protect you from those. At least Python is typed, and you don't have (in most cases) the same misery that you have with a language like PHP. Although that is moving to a typed language as well.

 

The only way to be resonably sure is use test driven design, have unit tests and a code coverage analyzer, create your unit tests and define the edge cases of your logic before you start coding. 


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #733 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 21 April 2018 - 14:50

#0  PSignal::get (this=0xf8) at python/connections.cpp:25
#1  0x00007ffff54d8843 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#2  0x00007ffff54dac8d in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#3  0x00007ffff54dae20 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#4  0x00007ffff54af0f3 in PyObject_Call () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#5  0x00007ffff5453dbd in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#6  0x00007ffff54af0f3 in PyObject_Call () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#7  0x00007ffff5542647 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#8  0x00007ffff547f088 in PyInstance_New () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#9  0x00007ffff54af0f3 in PyObject_Call () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#10 0x00007ffff54d6326 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#11 0x00007ffff54dac8d in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#12 0x00007ffff54daef5 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#13 0x00007ffff54af0f3 in PyObject_Call () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#14 0x00007ffff5440148 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#15 0x00007ffff54af0f3 in PyObject_Call () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#16 0x00007ffff54d6326 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#17 0x00007ffff54d8b69 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#18 0x00007ffff54d8b69 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#19 0x00007ffff54dac8d in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#20 0x00007ffff54d88e8 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#21 0x00007ffff54dac8d in PyEval_EvalCodeEx () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#22 0x00007ffff54daf72 in PyEval_EvalCode () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#23 0x00007ffff54db432 in PyRun_FileExFlags () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#24 0x00007ffff5572139 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpython2.7.so.1.0
#25 0x00000000005734ad in ePython::execFile (this=this@entry=0x7fffffffe0b1, file=0x9cfca8 "/usr/local/lib/enigma2/python/mytest.py") at python/python.cpp:145
#26 0x000000000047d390 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at enigma.cpp:301
(gdb) frame
#0  PSignal::get (this=0xf8) at python/connections.cpp:25
25		if (!m_list)

Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #734 Freon

  • Senior Member
  • 216 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 21 April 2018 - 15:01

Check it with notepad2.

MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU!


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #735 mrvica

  • Senior Member
  • 1,259 posts

+86
Good

Posted 21 April 2018 - 16:19

me too, after I did update.sh, the reason, in openpli-oe-core/sources
DirectFB-1.4.12.tar.gz
DirectFB-1.4.12.tar.gz_bad-checksum_27c7b2eefb78072ac27905821da79ac5
DirectFB-1.4.12.tar.gz.done

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #736 zeros

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 1,635 posts

+61
Good

Posted 21 April 2018 - 19:09

April 21, 2018
TEST Images for dm900 and dm920.
On board:
dm9(x)0: add support for 2160p60
enigma2: change front LED color
update skin_display
See more here:
https://github.com/P...commits/develop
Menu->Setup->System->Expert settings->Display setup
You can Make Front LED(blue) configurable for turning on or off during normal mode.
Default is off.
This needs a restart of enigma2 for now.
Friendly reminder:
Install from feed BackupSuite and make from your final state fullbackup. It works and you may need it in the future!
Happy testing!
21.04.2018
Z
Feed such as always.
Thanks all involved!  :)

DM920UHD DVB-S2X TRIPLE tuner + Triple M.S tuner DVB-S2X, DVB-T2/T, QboxHD, QboxHD Mini, Icecrypt T2300HD,
Qviart Lunix3 4K, Raspberry Pi 4 Model B 4GB & 8GB

Vertex 4K60 4:4:4 600MHz


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #737 starz

  • Senior Member
  • 59 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 21 April 2018 - 23:14

me too, after I did update.sh, the reason, in openpli-oe-core/sources
DirectFB-1.4.12.tar.gz
DirectFB-1.4.12.tar.gz_bad-checksum_27c7b2eefb78072ac27905821da79ac5
DirectFB-1.4.12.tar.gz.done


Ok thanks

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #738 mrvica

  • Senior Member
  • 1,259 posts

+86
Good

Posted 22 April 2018 - 06:40

you can fetch the file from here
http://sources.angst...B-1.4.12.tar.gz
I put it manually there, the same problem, still waiting for solution

Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #739 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 22 April 2018 - 06:55

Wait for MastaG to fix it :)

 

@MastaG


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: Howto build unofficial pli for your unsupported receiver #740 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,982 posts

+247
Excellent

Posted 22 April 2018 - 07:53

Hello, I had been away from thi s forum for some time and now...I came back and see it's possible to run Openpli on Raspberry 3??!!! Is it real???

But with DVB support??
If this is true I am the happiest man with a satellite dish on the roof!!! :-) :-)

So...can anyone please confirm this great news?

Thank you.

Max.

No dvb support just for develop and test :)


Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2



10 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users