Looks like that then the CCcam encryption layer is broken,
TS
Some more info after testing:
Refuses tot connect to all CCcam versions higher than version 2.011.
Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve
Started by pzanone, 03 Mar 2018 12:24
27 replies to this topic
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #21
-
- Senior Member
- 36 posts
+4
Neutral
Posted 4 March 2018 - 14:12
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #22
-
- Senior Member
- 2,338 posts
+33
Good
Posted 4 March 2018 - 15:16
The identification of this CCcam version is done wrong.
It identifies itself as 2.3.1-9d508a. Normally it should identify itself as 2.3.1-1234 > so four decimal numbers after the -
Maybe this is the problem why other CCcam servers give a 'version corrupted' error ?
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #23
-
- Senior Member
- 1,982 posts
+247
Excellent
Posted 4 March 2018 - 15:40
The identification of this CCcam version is done wrong.
It identifies itself as 2.3.1-9d508a. Normally it should identify itself as 2.3.1-1234 > so four decimal numbers after the -
Maybe this is the problem why other CCcam servers give a 'version corrupted' error ?
"9d508a" means a git hash and I think it's a OSCam with some name changes to CCCam, Also they're compiling it with
PV = "2.3.1-${SRCPV}" in their bitbake recipe
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #24
-
- PLi® Core member
- 46,969 posts
+542
Excellent
Posted 4 March 2018 - 19:21
That would be hilarious!
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #25
-
- Senior Member
- 224 posts
+13
Neutral
Posted 4 March 2018 - 19:24
cccam == oscam ???????????
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #26
-
- Senior Member
- 34 posts
+2
Neutral
Posted 5 March 2018 - 16:05
cccam == oscam ???????????
If so, then we would finally have an Oscam which is as simpel to configure as CCcam... 
Small test: it works (part of) in my DM8000 but with a lot of flaws. Ziggo card not opening several channels etc.So, currently unusable 
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #27
-
- Senior Member
- 224 posts
+13
Neutral
Posted 5 March 2018 - 19:02
The identification of this CCcam version is done wrong.
It identifies itself as 2.3.1-9d508a. Normally it should identify itself as 2.3.1-1234 > so four decimal numbers after the -
Maybe this is the problem why other CCcam servers give a 'version corrupted' error ?
mmmmmmm
9d508a
http://www.streamboard.tv/oscam/attachment/ticket/4656/CCcam-2.3.1-Support.2.patch
Re: Cccam 2.3.1 Pli armv7ve #28
-
- PLi® Core member
- 70,563 posts
+1,816
Excellent
Posted 5 March 2018 - 20:07
That may as well mean they are clueless as well...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
