Jump to content


Photo

satellites.xml is wrong !


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

Re: satellites.xml is wrong ! #61 occ

  • Member
  • 11 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 16 December 2018 - 22:29

Lyngsat indeed shows 950 and not 9500. I'm not sure which is correct.

9500 is the right symbol rate

 

<transponder frequency="11569000" symbol_rate="9500000" polarization="0" fec_inner="3" system="1" modulation="2" />

 

[21.6E] 11569 H 9500, FEC:3/4, DVB-S2 / 8PSK
Arryadia HD SAT Pr
Arryadia HD TNT Pr
Arryadia SD SAT Pr
Arryadia SD TNT Pr



Re: satellites.xml is wrong ! #62 Robinson

  • Senior Member
  • 2,621 posts

+30
Good

Posted 16 December 2018 - 22:33

Then it should be reported to Lyngsat, probably by someone with an account.


ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E

HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W


Re: satellites.xml is wrong ! #63 occ

  • Member
  • 11 posts

+1
Neutral

Posted 16 December 2018 - 23:05

It looks like there is something wrong with entries for 21.6E satelite.

Some of the SR's are too short.

 

The short SR's are OK, It are low symbol rates (radio stations)
symbol_rate="255000" = SR 255
symbol_rate="376000" = SR 376
symbol_rate="512000" = SR 512


Edited by satmaat, 16 December 2018 - 23:10.


Re: satellites.xml is wrong ! #64 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,668 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 16 December 2018 - 23:10

Just send an email and say the transponder info is wrong. Nothing more. And then the data will be updated. No need for accounts or explanations. Lyngsat want their data to be correct.



Re: satellites.xml is wrong ! #65 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,668 posts

+163
Excellent

Posted 16 December 2018 - 23:17

 

It looks like there is something wrong with entries for 21.6E satelite.

Some of the SR's are too short.

 

The short SR's are OK, It are low symbol rates (radio stations)
symbol_rate="255000" = SR 255
symbol_rate="376000" = SR 376
symbol_rate="512000" = SR 512

 

Yes they are correct. The SR is low because there is no point wasting bandwidth having a higher SR for such a small amount of data. But such a low SR is beyond the scope of most satellites tuners as these are designed for TV transport streams so not able to filter such a narrow bandwidth.




4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users