25 replies to this topic

[machare]

My HD51 is running OpenPli multiboot 6.2  mode 12

 

1)  The network is configured with a fixed IP address.  It does not like to stay active.  Is there anything that I should do to ensure that the network is always active?

 

2) Software update shows that there are 223 packages to update.  I can display a list of these packages.  When I select 'Update and reboot' nothing is updated. I get the next two screens with 'Please wait...'.  Nothing more is shown. The box reboots and the network adapter is not active.  The hardware and network connection are fine. No similar problems with other builds. 

 

3) I used telnet to update the box. There are now 222 packages to update.  Is there a later version of OpenPli multiboot that I could flash?

[machare]

PS. The build I am using is dated 2018-11-05

[betacentauri]

The box reboots and the network adapter is not active. The hardware and network connection are fine.

Network adapter is not active but network connections are fine?? That cannot be. Is it only in the GUI shown as disabled?

Regarding the updates. Are errors shown during installation?

[teo1966]

set dhcp to yes and try to restart enigma2

Edited by teo1966, 10 November 2018 - 20:42.

[WanWizard]

We know there is a display issue in cases where Enigma starts faster than the DHCP server provides an IP address. This is fixed in develop and will be part of the upcoming OpenPLi 7.

 

Restarting Enigma will fix the display issue, as when Enigma starts again, the network has already received its DHCP address.

[machare]

Thank you for the replies.  The network is not started even if I don't use DHCP.   Maybe OpenPLi 7 will be better.

[WanWizard]

Nothing has changed in that code for ages.

 

And you are contradicting yourself. How can you check for updates or telnet into the box if the network is "not active" or "not started"?

[ims]

222 packages for update ? Is it not better reflash it ?

[Erik Slagter]

Most definitely yes.

[littlesat]

Just install an image online via multiboot... done within a (few) minute(s) with your remote....

Edited by littlesat, 12 November 2018 - 07:18.

[Robinson]

Hello,

 

I have a problem completing an online update on my HD51.

Menu - Information - System shows:

 

Build date: 29 Oct.

Last update: 10 Dec.

Enigma version: 4 Sept.

 

Online update log:

Collected errors:
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * check_conflicts_for: The following packages conflict with openpli-bootlogo:
 * check_conflicts_for: 	satdreamgr-bootlogo * 
 * calculate_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for gstreamer1.0-plugin-dvbmediasink:
 * 	gstreamer1.0 (>= 1.12.4+git17604+505a24f) * 	libc6 (>= 2.24) * 	libelf1 (>= 0.166) * 
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * calculate_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for iptvsubparser:
 * 	libc6 (>= 2.24) * 
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * opkg_solver_upgrade: Package Not not installed.
 * calculate_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for libtuxtxt32bpp0:
 * 	libc6 (>= 2.26) * 	libfreetype6 (>= 2.8.1) * 	libtuxtxt0 (>= 2.0+git69+4ba7e86) * 
Not selecting libudfread0 0.0.0+git26+50d41b1 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Upgrading openpli-bootlogo from 20181029-r0.353 to 20181210-r0.408 on root.
Not selecting libc6 2.24 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libc6 2.24 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libelf1 0.168 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libelf1 0.168 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Package 3rd-party-feed-configs is already installed on root.
Package tzdata is already installed on root.
Not selecting libdvdread4 5.0+git287+5ec4095 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Upgrading iptvsubparser from 1.0+git3+789b900-r0.0 to 1.0+git4+eb3c248-r0.0 on root.
Not selecting libc6 2.24 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libc6 2.24 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Package enigma2-plugin-extensions-openwebif is already installed on root.
Not selecting libdvdnav4 5.0+git793+0e0ed2a as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Not selecting libcap2 2.24 as installing it would break existing dependencies.
Package python-ipaddress is already installed on /media/mmcblk0p7.
Package python-ipaddress is already installed on /media/mmcblk0p7.
Package softcam-support is already installed on root.
Package volatile-media is already installed on root.
xargs: opkg: exited with status 255; aborting

What is wrong, please?

[Erik Slagter]

Yes we know of this issue. We're looking at it. It's seems to be caused by a recent BSP update from Zgemma.

[WanWizard]

This is not our image?

[Robinson]

It is OpenPLi in Slot1.

Other slots: OpenATV, SatdreamGr, OpenPLi.

[WanWizard]

The output above is not from (a standard) OpenPLi. There is no satdreamgr-bootlogo in OpenPLi.

[Robinson]

I have not added any bootlogos to OpenPLi. However Satdreamgr_5 image is installed in Slot_3 so maybe it has something to do with it?

 

Attached Files

•  Slots.jpg   81.74KB   5 downloads

Edited by Robinson, 15 December 2018 - 22:44.

[WanWizard]

I can't comment on what you're doing.

 

I can only see that the output you posted refers to files not present in OpenPLi.

[twol]

I have not added any bootlogos to OpenPLi. However Satdreamgr_5 image is installed in Slot_3 so maybe it has something to do with it?

If Satdreamgr is based on OpenPli, then could it be that on an image flash or settings restore the  "system" has used the other images settings backup - it is why for multiboot receivers, I tend to keep image backup settings on different media and I also have code to not list these backups for restore from certain images.   

Edited by twol, 16 December 2018 - 09:44.

[Robinson]

Well, it may be possible so it is not recommended to have OpenPLi and Satdreamgr in the flash at the same time?

[betacentauri]

In different partitions/slots it’s no problem. But if somehow packages from satgr are installed in PLI image, then this is a problem and not recommended at all.
Maybe really the backup is the problem.