And what about ci+ support for 7.0 version? ciplushelper for 6.2 doesn't work.
CI+ Helper
Started by GOI, 14 Nov 2018 07:44
4 replies to this topic
Re: CI+ Helper #2
-
- PLi® Core member
- 56,274 posts
+691
Excellent
Posted 14 November 2018 - 07:51
We cannot support ci+ because of the ‘ci+ police’... so when it happens it should be supported via some kind of 3rd party... it is also extreme wierd that other images support it, while they do not support softcam?
Edited by littlesat, 14 November 2018 - 07:52.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: CI+ Helper #3
-
- PLi® Core member
- 46,960 posts
+541
Excellent
Posted 14 November 2018 - 19:40
Yes we can support CI+, if the manufacturers would facilitate it. There would have to be some interface to the drivers where the a.o. the certificate could be sent to (which of course, by nature, is always illegal) and a proper description of this API. Currently none of the manufacturers supply these, so that's end of story.
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Re: CI+ Helper #4
-
- Senior Member
- 2,616 posts
+30
Good
Posted 29 October 2019 - 21:53
Has anything changed over the last year?
ET9000, OpenPLi 4.0, 13E, 19E
HD51, OpenPLi 6.2, 75E - 30W
Re: CI+ Helper #5
-
- PLi® Core member
- 68,623 posts
+1,739
Excellent
Posted 30 October 2019 - 20:11
No.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
