Jump to content


Photo

low power in-house card server hardware


  • Please log in to reply
33 replies to this topic

Re: low power in-house card server hardware #21 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,311 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 7 January 2019 - 23:31

No, I don't. Otherwise I probably wouldn't even have bothered with trying to use the Synology.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #22 kalehrl

  • Senior Member
  • 468 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 8 January 2019 - 07:51

I've been using HP t5740 for some time:

https://www.parkytow...740/index.shtml

Small, fanless, cheap (second-hand), with plenty of USB ports and x86.



Re: low power in-house card server hardware #23 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,311 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 8 January 2019 - 12:50

Interesting idea. x86 is a big plus, but on the other hand 10-12W power is maybe a bit to much for just a cardserver.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #24 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,951 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 8 January 2019 - 20:04

 

You access the Argolis in the wrong mode I think, mine doesn't need any udev rules and you can reboot the box and the identifier will never change.

 

I don't have that problem either, after a reboot it is always the same. But if I unplug and plug back, it becomes ttyUSB3/4/5 instead of 0/1/2. This issue is adressed with the udev rules (which work fine as well).

That's what happens when you unplug devices when they're still in use / open. If you close them first, there is no such issue.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #25 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,951 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 8 January 2019 - 20:05

I've been using HP t5740 for some time:

https://www.parkytow...740/index.shtml

Small, fanless, cheap (second-hand), with plenty of USB ports and x86.

Likewise I've been using Dell "Nettops" with an Atom CPU. Only using 12 W of power.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #26 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,951 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 8 January 2019 - 20:06

Another idea, find someone who still has an xp1000, it will only use 6 W.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #27 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,311 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 8 January 2019 - 22:54

I have one, but as I sometimes need that for test purposes, the same problem as having cards in a box applies. ;)


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #28 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,608 posts

+211
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2019 - 10:16

Do you need tuner, reader or usb port only... H9 with turned-off tuner has 1,7W in standby, online it has 2,3W. May be - H9.x ...?

I have XP1000, but post will be bigger than value xp1000, imho.


Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!

Re: low power in-house card server hardware #29 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,311 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2019 - 13:05

Same problem, if I need the H9 for testing, I lose my cardserver. This is why I don't want to use a box.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #30 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,608 posts

+211
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2019 - 13:23

? You cannot use next H9 ?


Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!

Re: low power in-house card server hardware #31 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,311 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2019 - 13:25

You mean a second H9? Bit of a waste of a good STB, no?


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #32 ims

  • PLi® Core member
  • 13,608 posts

+211
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2019 - 14:35

Then use H9 instead xp1000 and xp1000 use as cardserver. I think, that use xp1000 for testing in future is very unlikely.


Kdo nic nedělá, nic nezkazí!

Re: low power in-house card server hardware #33 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,311 posts

+1,719
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2019 - 16:35

You may have a point. It also depends home many there are in the team, of at least one can test. we're ok.


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: low power in-house card server hardware #34 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,951 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 10 January 2019 - 19:55

Then use H9 instead xp1000 and xp1000 use as cardserver. I think, that use xp1000 for testing in future is very unlikely.

+1


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users