Jump to content


Photo

Zgemma h9/H9.x no AC3 audio

H9 H9.2h ac3

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 nokias

  • Member
  • 12 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 24 April 2019 - 02:02

Hi,

Using Zgemma h9x with Openpli7 (rc or last version) there is no audio in ac3 channels.

Changing "multi channel downmix" or advanced "menu" options doesnt make any diference.

 

For testing purposes i've flashed an old backup from openpli 6.2 and it works fine.

 

Is there any fix to this? (drivers or something)

 

 

 

Many thanks for your great job.


Edited by nokias, 24 April 2019 - 02:04.


Re: Zgemma h9/H9.x no AC3 audio #2 nokias

  • Member
  • 12 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 24 April 2019 - 02:54

After a clean install its working fine!

 

The problem was something in my rc version, and after an update-upgrade it didnt solve the problem.

Any ideia in how to fix it in earlier rc version?

 

Thanks!



Re: Zgemma h9/H9.x no AC3 audio #3 Pr2

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 6,075 posts

+257
Excellent

Posted 24 April 2019 - 09:07

rc means release candidate this is a preview version of the final release to tackle the remaining bugs.

The RC has limited timelife so once the final release is out, the RC is no longer supported and the feed for plugins and updates are stopped.

So you need to use now the official release of OpenPLi and no longer a RC version.


NO SUPPORT by PM, it is a forum make your question public so everybody can benefit from the question/answer.
If you think that my answer helps you, you can press the up arrow in bottom right of the answer.

Wanna help with OpenPLi Translation? Please read our Wiki Information for translators

Sat: Hotbird 13.0E, Astra 19.2E, Eutelsat5A 5.0W
VU+ Solo 4K: 2*DVB-S2 + 2*DVB-C/T/T2 (used in DVB-C) & Duo 4K: 2*DVB-S2X + DVB-C (FBC)

AB-Com: PULSe 4K 1*DVB-S2X (+ DVB-C/T/T2)
Edision OS Mio 4K: 1*DVB-S2X + 1*DVB-C/T/T2
 


Re: Zgemma h9/H9.x no AC3 audio #4 nokias

  • Member
  • 12 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 24 April 2019 - 19:49

Ok. I understand that.

I thought that the stable release was an evoltution process of the rc... Like that in some moment that it was considered "significatively ok" it started to be called stable.

Before the update-upgrade, i've changed the feeds to the new ones (final), so i thought it would update everything...
Maby that was the mistake, because the starting point of the stable could have more improvements than the last rc update.

Am I right?

Really thanks


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users