I also found a solution on this forum:
https://cs-forum.eu/...45&p=1898#p1898
Added code to the original source satipclient.
But I can't test it myself.
You write that it doesn't work...
SAT>IP support improvements
Started by malakudi, 30 Sep 2020 16:22
31 replies to this topic
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #21
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,992 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 1 January 2024 - 16:45
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #22
-
- Member
- 22 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 2 January 2024 - 00:56
Yes that's right. For me it does not work and I cannot understand why.
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #23
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,992 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 2 January 2024 - 11:20
Yes that's right. For me it does not work and I cannot understand why.
Enable debug log and post it here.
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #24
-
- Member
- 22 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 2 January 2024 - 21:50
Of course but how can I do that ?
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #25
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,992 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 3 January 2024 - 09:47
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #26
-
- Member
- 3 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 3 January 2024 - 10:02
Hello, Please, what does it look like with ARMV7 4x2100MHz CPU? Open PLI "sees" only 1872MHz. Thank you for your response.
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #27
-
- PLi® Core member
- 68,544 posts
+1,737
Excellent
Posted 3 January 2024 - 10:27
Hello, Please, what does it look like with ARMV7 4x2100MHz CPU? Open PLI "sees" only 1872MHz. Thank you for your response.
OpenPLi reports what the OS reports. Either the report is wrong or the marketing info you've been given about your box is wrong.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #28
-
- Member
- 22 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 7 January 2024 - 17:03
Hello Dimitrij,
I started the debug file with the latest satipclient from the satdreamgr feed:
In the log file you should be able to see that it is able to find DVB-C channels on virtual Tuner D.
After I have replaced the satipclient by that from marian34 in /usr/bin and gave the suitable rights by chmod 755 /usr/bin/satipclient you should be able to see the new results in the end of the debuglog attached.
What are the differences by the way between your satipclient file and that of marian34 which is much bigger in size and from 22-12-2022 ?
Attached Files
-
enigma.20240107.debuglog 221.24KB
2 downloads
Edited by dxellas, 7 January 2024 - 17:03.
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #29
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,992 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 7 January 2024 - 19:16
What are the differences by the way between your satipclient file and that of marian34 which is much bigger in size and from 22-12-2022 ?
Only the marian34 knows this.
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #30
-
- Member
- 22 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 7 January 2024 - 19:27
Ok, besides that can you see anything in the debug log ?
I will make another one with your attached satclient.
Is it a newer version compared to that from my screenshot above ?
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #31
-
- PLi® Core member
- 9,992 posts
+338
Excellent
Posted 7 January 2024 - 19:30
I have no more ideas where to look for the problem.
GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Solo 4K
Re: SAT>IP support improvements #32
-
- Member
- 22 posts
0
Neutral
Posted 14 January 2024 - 22:51
Sorry for answering that late.
Thank you anyway for your effort Dimitrij.
I will return as soon as I will have some spare time again.
Just this:
DVB Viewer Pro can scan the DVB-T2 Tuner and find all the channels.
As far as I have understood the TV needs all parameters when scanning even if not used.
Edited by dxellas, 14 January 2024 - 22:52.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
