I'll fire up my buildserver and see what ot does. I'll try the second one first.
devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #41
Posted 28 April 2021 - 15:37
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #42
Posted 28 April 2021 - 16:23
That gives "nothing RPROVIDES" on both the h9 and the vuduo4k build, so that doesn't work. Now trying your first suggestion...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #43
Posted 28 April 2021 - 16:39
And that works (or at least, that compiles).
Do you create a PR for it (so you get the attribution) or should I commit it?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #44
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #45
Posted 28 April 2021 - 20:43
Ok, done.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #46
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #47
Posted 28 April 2021 - 21:42
There were no issues building the VU+ Duo 4K image, I checked that one.
I have no build environment for Gigablue . We'll see what happened tomorrow, after tonights scheduled builds...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #48
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #49
Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:26
About kodi's patchset for stb, I am comparing the files one by one...
OE-A does provide one more .cpp and .h for input and power man.
https://github.com/o...ort.patch#L6038
Could it be the missing piece? Why isn't it in our patchset?
If kodi runs on other models this could be unnecessary.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #50
Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:29
No idea, this is all way beyond my skillset.
Most likely because nobody has ever bothered to look at kodi before, none of us uses it.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #51
Posted 29 April 2021 - 11:57
I need to revert the "zgemma" rdepends fix, it didn't fix anything. No idea why on my own build server I had no issue with the h9 build...
ERROR: kodi-1_18.9+gitrAUTOINC+0655c2c718-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/lib/kodi/kodi-stb contained in package kodi requires libGLESv2.so, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_kodi? [file-rdeps] ERROR: kodi-1_18.9+gitrAUTOINC+0655c2c718-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/lib/kodi/kodi-stb contained in package kodi requires libEGL.so, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_kodi? [file-rdeps]
and so on...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #52
Posted 29 April 2021 - 12:08
I don't understand why,
https://github.com/z...ddriver.inc#L11
But these zgemma do also need mesa and maybe there is some conflict..
If you prefer readd the INSANE_SKIP but this only masks the problem...
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #53
Posted 29 April 2021 - 13:44
I agree masking the problem isn't a good idea.
But we need to do something, we need to branch off 8.1 soon, and we can't do that with build errors in develop...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #54
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #55
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #56
Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:06
Argh,
I was updating the patchset and the recipe has changed under my nose... https://tinyurl.com/usmeksv5
I am adding some missing bits from OE-A hoping this helps.
Well, now about the changes in PR#964 ...please revert and redo step by step.
Some are wrong:
-gold breaks on mipsel
-the mipsel changes are just more lines, I had just cleaned that
- the LTO option is unrecognized by CMake
-DENABLE_STATIC_LIBS=FALSE is only in meta-kodi, not in OE-A
gstreamer...we don't have the gstplayer for the moment, let's add it once kodi runs
About the rest, seems ok but note that OE-A does manage FFMPEG in a strange way..see patchset..
https://github.com/o...b-support.patch
Cheers
A.A.
Edited by A.A., 30 April 2021 - 15:15.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #57
Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:23
by the way,
these are the diffs between OpenPLi and OE-A kodi_18 sysroot providers:
--- openpli.txt 2021-04-30 16:21:00.569786159 +0200
+++ OE-A.txt 2021-04-30 16:19:46.013561005 +0200
@@ -5,14 +5,20 @@
base-files
base-passwd
bash-completion
+bluez5
+bluez-hcidump
boost
bzip2
+cairo
+cdparanoia
cracklib
crossguid
+cryptodev-linux
curl
db
dbus
-dcadec
+dbus-glib
+directfb
e2fsprogs
enca
eudev
@@ -23,6 +29,7 @@
flac
flatbuffers
flex
+fmt
fontconfig
freetype
fribidi
@@ -35,39 +42,42 @@
gmp
gnutls
gobject-introspection
+gstreamer1.0
+gstreamer1.0-plugins-base
+harfbuzz
icu
initscripts
-jansson
+iso-codes
jpeg
kmod
-krb5
lame
lcms
-libaio
libass
+libatomic-ops
+libatomics-ops
libav
libbluray
-libbsd
libcap
libcap-ng
libcdio
libcec
+libcrypto
libdaemon
+libdcadec
libdvdcss
libdvdnav
libdvdread
libevdev
libffi
-libfmt
libgcc
libgcrypt
-libgles-vuduo2
+libgles
libgpg-error
+libical
libid3tag
libidn2
libinput
libjpeg-turbo
-libldb
libmad
libmicrohttpd
libmms
@@ -75,6 +85,7 @@
libnfs
libnsl2
libogg
+libopus
libpam
libpcre
libplist
@@ -86,18 +97,15 @@
libsndfile1
libsquish
libssh
-libssh2
-libtalloc
-libtasn1
-libtdb
-libtevent
+libssl
+libsysfs2
libtheora
+libtheora0
libtinyxml
libtirpc
libtool
libunistring
libusb1
-libv4l
libvorbis
libvpx
libxcrypt
@@ -106,7 +114,6 @@
libxslt
linux-libc-headers
lzo
-media-ctl
module-init-tools
module-init-tools-depmod
module-init-tools-insmod-static
@@ -114,33 +121,42 @@
mtdev
ncurses
nettle
openjpeg
-openldap
-openpli.txt
openssl
+openssl10
+openssl-conf
opkg-utils
+orc
p8platform
+pango
pcre
perl
+pixman
+pkgconfig
popt
+pulseaudio
python
python3
rapidjson
readline
rtmpdump
samba
+sbc
shadow
shadow-sysroot
+speexdsp
sqlite3
swig
+sysfsutils
taglib
tiff
+tremor
+tslib
udev
-udev-extraconf
update-rc.d
util-linux
util-macros
-v4l-utils
virtual_crypt
virtual_egl
virtual_libc
@@ -148,10 +164,11 @@
virtual_libiconv
virtual_librpc
virtual_mipsel-oe-linux-compilerlibs
+vuplus-libgles-vuduo2
wavpack
x264
x265
-xbmc-support-vuduo2
xz
yajl
+yasm
zlib
crypto stuff is different
Edited by A.A., 30 April 2021 - 15:25.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #58
Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:38
Something I just remembered, but I don't know if it is relevant: If somehow the dvbmediasink is used by Kodi , OE-A uses is a different one.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #59
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #60
Posted 30 April 2021 - 16:06
Merged.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users