I'll fire up my buildserver and see what ot does. I'll try the second one first.
Please notice that advertising helps us to cover the cost of hosting the project.
If you find these ads displayed intrusive or inappropriate, please contact the webmaster.
devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #41
Posted 28 April 2021 - 15:37
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #42
Posted 28 April 2021 - 16:23
That gives "nothing RPROVIDES" on both the h9 and the vuduo4k build, so that doesn't work. Now trying your first suggestion...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #43
Posted 28 April 2021 - 16:39
And that works (or at least, that compiles).
Do you create a PR for it (so you get the attribution) or should I commit it?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #44
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #45
Posted 28 April 2021 - 20:43
Ok, done.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #46
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #47
Posted 28 April 2021 - 21:42
There were no issues building the VU+ Duo 4K image, I checked that one.
I have no build environment for Gigablue . We'll see what happened tomorrow, after tonights scheduled builds...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #48
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #49
Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:26
About kodi's patchset for stb, I am comparing the files one by one...
OE-A does provide one more .cpp and .h for input and power man.
https://github.com/o...ort.patch#L6038
Could it be the missing piece? Why isn't it in our patchset?
If kodi runs on other models this could be unnecessary.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #50
Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:29
No idea, this is all way beyond my skillset.
Most likely because nobody has ever bothered to look at kodi before, none of us uses it.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #51
Posted 29 April 2021 - 11:57
I need to revert the "zgemma" rdepends fix, it didn't fix anything. No idea why on my own build server I had no issue with the h9 build...
ERROR: kodi-1_18.9+gitrAUTOINC+0655c2c718-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/lib/kodi/kodi-stb contained in package kodi requires libGLESv2.so, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_kodi? [file-rdeps] ERROR: kodi-1_18.9+gitrAUTOINC+0655c2c718-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/lib/kodi/kodi-stb contained in package kodi requires libEGL.so, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_kodi? [file-rdeps]
and so on...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #52
Posted 29 April 2021 - 12:08
I don't understand why,
https://github.com/z...ddriver.inc#L11
But these zgemma do also need mesa and maybe there is some conflict..
If you prefer readd the INSANE_SKIP but this only masks the problem...
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #53
Posted 29 April 2021 - 13:44
I agree masking the problem isn't a good idea.
But we need to do something, we need to branch off 8.1 soon, and we can't do that with build errors in develop...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #54
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #55
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #56
Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:06
Argh,
I was updating the patchset and the recipe has changed under my nose... https://tinyurl.com/usmeksv5
I am adding some missing bits from OE-A hoping this helps.
Well, now about the changes in PR#964 ...please revert and redo step by step.
Some are wrong:
-gold breaks on mipsel
-the mipsel changes are just more lines, I had just cleaned that
- the LTO option is unrecognized by CMake
-DENABLE_STATIC_LIBS=FALSE is only in meta-kodi, not in OE-A
gstreamer...we don't have the gstplayer for the moment, let's add it once kodi runs
About the rest, seems ok but note that OE-A does manage FFMPEG in a strange way..see patchset..
https://github.com/o...b-support.patch
Cheers
A.A.
Edited by A.A., 30 April 2021 - 15:15.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #57
Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:23
by the way,
these are the diffs between OpenPLi and OE-A kodi_18 sysroot providers:
--- openpli.txt 2021-04-30 16:21:00.569786159 +0200
+++ OE-A.txt 2021-04-30 16:19:46.013561005 +0200
@@ -5,14 +5,20 @@
base-files
base-passwd
bash-completion
+bluez5
+bluez-hcidump
boost
bzip2
+cairo
+cdparanoia
cracklib
crossguid
+cryptodev-linux
curl
db
dbus
-dcadec
+dbus-glib
+directfb
e2fsprogs
enca
eudev
@@ -23,6 +29,7 @@
flac
flatbuffers
flex
+fmt
fontconfig
freetype
fribidi
@@ -35,39 +42,42 @@
gmp
gnutls
gobject-introspection
+gstreamer1.0
+gstreamer1.0-plugins-base
+harfbuzz
icu
initscripts
-jansson
+iso-codes
jpeg
kmod
-krb5
lame
lcms
-libaio
libass
+libatomic-ops
+libatomics-ops
libav
libbluray
-libbsd
libcap
libcap-ng
libcdio
libcec
+libcrypto
libdaemon
+libdcadec
libdvdcss
libdvdnav
libdvdread
libevdev
libffi
-libfmt
libgcc
libgcrypt
-libgles-vuduo2
+libgles
libgpg-error
+libical
libid3tag
libidn2
libinput
libjpeg-turbo
-libldb
libmad
libmicrohttpd
libmms
@@ -75,6 +85,7 @@
libnfs
libnsl2
libogg
+libopus
libpam
libpcre
libplist
@@ -86,18 +97,15 @@
libsndfile1
libsquish
libssh
-libssh2
-libtalloc
-libtasn1
-libtdb
-libtevent
+libssl
+libsysfs2
libtheora
+libtheora0
libtinyxml
libtirpc
libtool
libunistring
libusb1
-libv4l
libvorbis
libvpx
libxcrypt
@@ -106,7 +114,6 @@
libxslt
linux-libc-headers
lzo
-media-ctl
module-init-tools
module-init-tools-depmod
module-init-tools-insmod-static
@@ -114,33 +121,42 @@
mtdev
ncurses
nettle
openjpeg
-openldap
-openpli.txt
openssl
+openssl10
+openssl-conf
opkg-utils
+orc
p8platform
+pango
pcre
perl
+pixman
+pkgconfig
popt
+pulseaudio
python
python3
rapidjson
readline
rtmpdump
samba
+sbc
shadow
shadow-sysroot
+speexdsp
sqlite3
swig
+sysfsutils
taglib
tiff
+tremor
+tslib
udev
-udev-extraconf
update-rc.d
util-linux
util-macros
-v4l-utils
virtual_crypt
virtual_egl
virtual_libc
@@ -148,10 +164,11 @@
virtual_libiconv
virtual_librpc
virtual_mipsel-oe-linux-compilerlibs
+vuplus-libgles-vuduo2
wavpack
x264
x265
-xbmc-support-vuduo2
xz
yajl
+yasm
zlib
crypto stuff is different
Edited by A.A., 30 April 2021 - 15:25.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #58
Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:38
Something I just remembered, but I don't know if it is relevant: If somehow the dvbmediasink is used by Kodi , OE-A uses is a different one.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #59
Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #60
Posted 30 April 2021 - 16:06
Merged.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users