Jump to content


Photo

devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel


  • Please log in to reply
124 replies to this topic

Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #41 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 28 April 2021 - 15:37

I'll fire up my buildserver and see what ot does. I'll try the second one first.


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #42 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 28 April 2021 - 16:23

That gives "nothing RPROVIDES" on both the h9 and the vuduo4k build, so that doesn't work. Now trying your first suggestion...


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #43 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 28 April 2021 - 16:39

And that works (or at least, that compiles).

 

Do you create a PR for it (so you get the attribution) or should I commit it?


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #44 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 28 April 2021 - 20:34

Please go on and check about other manufacturers possibly influenced. Thx.

I'll test the possible simplification.

 

Cheers

A.A.



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #45 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 28 April 2021 - 20:43

Ok, done.


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #46 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 28 April 2021 - 20:53

Are the Vu+ 4k models also needing libgles?

 

Ah, what about Gigablue, all is commented out.

 

A.A.



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #47 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 28 April 2021 - 21:42

There were no issues building the VU+ Duo 4K image, I checked that one.

 

I have no build environment for Gigablue ;). We'll see what happened tomorrow, after tonights scheduled builds...


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #48 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:05

It seems to me Zgemma needs some more appends, both for v3d and mali.

I could find some mali stuff in the OE-A patchset but I don't have the device...



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #49 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:26

About kodi's patchset for stb, I am comparing the files one by one...

OE-A does provide one more .cpp and .h for input and power man.

 

https://github.com/o...ort.patch#L6038

 

Could it be the missing piece? Why isn't it in our patchset?

If kodi runs on other models this could be unnecessary.



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #50 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 28 April 2021 - 22:29

No idea, this is all way beyond my skillset. ;)

 

Most likely because nobody has ever bothered to look at kodi before, none of us uses it.


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #51 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 29 April 2021 - 11:57

I need to revert the "zgemma" rdepends fix, it didn't fix anything. No idea why on my own build server I had no issue with the h9 build...

ERROR: kodi-1_18.9+gitrAUTOINC+0655c2c718-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/lib/kodi/kodi-stb contained in package kodi requires libGLESv2.so, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_kodi? [file-rdeps]
ERROR: kodi-1_18.9+gitrAUTOINC+0655c2c718-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: /usr/lib/kodi/kodi-stb contained in package kodi requires libEGL.so, but no providers found in RDEPENDS_kodi? [file-rdeps]

and so on...


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #52 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 29 April 2021 - 12:08

I don't understand why,

 

https://github.com/z...ddriver.inc#L11

 

But these zgemma do also need mesa and maybe there is some conflict..

 

If you prefer readd the INSANE_SKIP but this only masks the problem...



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #53 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 29 April 2021 - 13:44

I agree masking the problem isn't a good idea.

 

But we need to do something, we need to branch off 8.1 soon, and we can't do that with build errors in develop...


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #54 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 29 April 2021 - 14:41

If it is only a few machines I can try a build from scratch.

 

You could add again the INSANE_SKIP as it was but remember it influences *all* machines. Add a # FIX-ME for later :)

Don't worry too much, there is a lot of them around in the kodi folder / addons

 

A.A.



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #55 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 29 April 2021 - 22:04

Well, I see now that the Enigma2 Player is default.

The settings are       <defaultplayer>E2Player</defaultplayer>

 

AFAIS the internal player is libdvdnav-mipsel.so and imagine what, OE-A has a build patch for this...

 

Testing...

A.A.


Edited by A.A., 29 April 2021 - 22:06.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #56 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:06

Argh,

I was updating the patchset and the recipe has changed under my nose... https://tinyurl.com/usmeksv5

I am adding some missing bits from OE-A hoping this helps.

 

Well, now about the changes in PR#964 ...please revert and redo step by step.

 

Some are wrong:

-gold breaks on mipsel

-the mipsel changes are just more lines, I had just cleaned that

- the LTO option is unrecognized  by CMake

-DENABLE_STATIC_LIBS=FALSE  is only in meta-kodi, not in OE-A

 

gstreamer...we don't have the gstplayer for the moment, let's add it once kodi runs

 

About the rest, seems ok but note that OE-A does manage FFMPEG in a strange way..see patchset..

https://github.com/o...b-support.patch

 

Cheers

A.A.



Edited by A.A., 30 April 2021 - 15:15.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #57 A.A.

  • Senior Member
  • 251 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:23

by the way,

these are the diffs between OpenPLi and OE-A kodi_18 sysroot providers:

 

--- openpli.txt    2021-04-30 16:21:00.569786159 +0200
+++ OE-A.txt    2021-04-30 16:19:46.013561005 +0200
@@ -5,14 +5,20 @@
 base-files
 base-passwd
 bash-completion
+bluez5
+bluez-hcidump
 boost
 bzip2
+cairo
+cdparanoia
 cracklib
 crossguid
+cryptodev-linux
 curl
 db
 dbus
-dcadec
+dbus-glib
+directfb
 e2fsprogs
 enca
 eudev
@@ -23,6 +29,7 @@
 flac
 flatbuffers
 flex
+fmt
 fontconfig
 freetype
 fribidi
@@ -35,39 +42,42 @@
 gmp
 gnutls
 gobject-introspection
+gstreamer1.0
+gstreamer1.0-plugins-base
+harfbuzz
 icu
 initscripts
-jansson
+iso-codes
 jpeg
 kmod
-krb5
 lame
 lcms
-libaio
 libass
+libatomic-ops
+libatomics-ops
 libav
 libbluray
-libbsd
 libcap
 libcap-ng
 libcdio
 libcec
+libcrypto
 libdaemon
+libdcadec
 libdvdcss
 libdvdnav
 libdvdread
 libevdev
 libffi
-libfmt
 libgcc
 libgcrypt
-libgles-vuduo2
+libgles
 libgpg-error
+libical
 libid3tag
 libidn2
 libinput
 libjpeg-turbo
-libldb
 libmad
 libmicrohttpd
 libmms
@@ -75,6 +85,7 @@
 libnfs
 libnsl2
 libogg
+libopus
 libpam
 libpcre
 libplist
@@ -86,18 +97,15 @@
 libsndfile1
 libsquish
 libssh
-libssh2
-libtalloc
-libtasn1
-libtdb
-libtevent
+libssl
+libsysfs2
 libtheora
+libtheora0
 libtinyxml
 libtirpc
 libtool
 libunistring
 libusb1
-libv4l
 libvorbis
 libvpx
 libxcrypt
@@ -106,7 +114,6 @@
 libxslt
 linux-libc-headers
 lzo
-media-ctl
 module-init-tools
 module-init-tools-depmod
 module-init-tools-insmod-static
@@ -114,33 +121,42 @@
 mtdev
 ncurses
 nettle
 openjpeg
-openldap
-openpli.txt
 openssl
+openssl10
+openssl-conf
 opkg-utils
+orc
 p8platform
+pango
 pcre
 perl
+pixman
+pkgconfig
 popt
+pulseaudio
 python
 python3
 rapidjson
 readline
 rtmpdump
 samba
+sbc
 shadow
 shadow-sysroot
+speexdsp
 sqlite3
 swig
+sysfsutils
 taglib
 tiff
+tremor
+tslib
 udev
-udev-extraconf
 update-rc.d
 util-linux
 util-macros
-v4l-utils
 virtual_crypt
 virtual_egl
 virtual_libc
@@ -148,10 +164,11 @@
 virtual_libiconv
 virtual_librpc
 virtual_mipsel-oe-linux-compilerlibs
+vuplus-libgles-vuduo2
 wavpack
 x264
 x265
-xbmc-support-vuduo2
 xz
 yajl
+yasm
 zlib

 

crypto stuff is different


Edited by A.A., 30 April 2021 - 15:25.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #58 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:38

Something I just remembered, but I don't know if it is relevant: If somehow the dvbmediasink is used by Kodi , OE-A uses is a different one.


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.


Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #59 rantanplan

  • Senior Member
  • 737 posts

+38
Good

Posted 30 April 2021 - 15:51

revert as pull request.
Sorry



Re: devel: kodi_18 vs mipsel #60 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 58,391 posts

+1,273
Excellent

Posted 30 April 2021 - 16:06

Merged.


Currently in use: VU+Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), Amiko Viper T2C (T2+fallback), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (T2+fallback)

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.

Because to health reasons, I will not be active online very often anymore.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users