softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release
Re: softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release #21
Re: softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release #22
Posted 25 February 2021 - 19:10
I doubt it, cccam will only get older and older, and less likely to work, like other old stuff like mgcamd.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release #23
Re: softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release #24
Posted 26 February 2021 - 07:05
So the panel still reads stuff from a previous cccam operation even if the softcam is changed!
That does not mean that the new selected softcam is not running, the info is just temporarily wrong!
Re: softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release #25
Posted 26 February 2021 - 20:54
Above all, Cccam has closed source code and it is not freely available on the internet. This Cccam is obsolete, although functional.
However, compatibility with new system libraries causes problems. Even if you use symbolic links (these will invoke a new version of the libraries), there may not always be 100% compatible functions. This is a stumbling block.
Oscam, on the other hand, has its code open and is being modified by developers around the world as needed. Newer build versions are constantly being developed and the original code is being updated.
I personally also prefer Cccam, but only for use as a softcam-client. As a softcam-server I use Oscam at home. This is the most compatible usage for some types of coding systems .
Edited by s3n0, 26 February 2021 - 20:57.
Re: softcam problem formuler f1 pli8.0 release #26
Posted 3 March 2021 - 10:08
Edited by daveraver, 3 March 2021 - 10:09.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users