https://forums.openp...dpost&p=1337611
For better support, I'll link it to the English section.
The box mentioned above exists as a finished layer.
So you could build an image for it.
https://github.com/H...e/bre2ze4k.conf
Tesbuild was no problem
4 replies to this topic
#1
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 1,803 posts
+83
Good
Posted 12 April 2021 - 20:02
Re: Image for WWio Bre2ze4k #2
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 6,073 posts
+257
Excellent
Posted 13 April 2021 - 16:42
It is the manufacturer that should contact OpenPLi and discuss about the terms and condition to have this box officially supported.
What I know is that the manufacturer should provide and maintain a valid BSP and OpenPLi needs access to the development team to escalate potential driver bugs so have a real support from the manufacturer.
NO SUPPORT by PM, it is a forum make your question public so everybody can benefit from the question/answer.
If you think that my answer helps you, you can press the up arrow in bottom right of the answer.
Wanna help with OpenPLi Translation? Please read our Wiki Information for translators
Sat: Hotbird 13.0E, Astra 19.2E, Eutelsat5A 5.0W
VU+ Solo 4K: 2*DVB-S2 + 2*DVB-C/T/T2 (used in DVB-C) & Duo 4K: 2*DVB-S2X + DVB-C (FBC)
AB-Com: PULSe 4K 1*DVB-S2X (+ DVB-C/T/T2)
Edision OS Mio 4K: 1*DVB-S2X + 1*DVB-C/T/T2
Re: Image for WWio Bre2ze4k #3
-
- PLi® Core member
- 68,558 posts
+1,737
Excellent
Posted 13 April 2021 - 17:05
It is available in the BSP, but no idea whether or not its up to date, it was added before OpenPLi 7 was released, and never updated since.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: Image for WWio Bre2ze4k #4
-
- PLi® Contributor
- 1,803 posts
+83
Good
Posted 13 April 2021 - 18:18
The updates to hd51 have also been incorporated there ;-)
Kernel is the same.
The whole image is the same in terms of construction, except for the driver.
The build server doesn't really have much else to do as the stuff is already there.
I'm only asking here because I don't quite understand it.
BSP is available and also available for hd61.
A develop image and feedback from users is fine, or not?
I don't have any of the boxes, but why not building
Re: Image for WWio Bre2ze4k #5
-
- PLi® Core member
- 68,558 posts
+1,737
Excellent
Posted 13 April 2021 - 18:41
Simple: The name OpenPLi stands for stability and support.
To be able to provide that, we require direct access to the vendor and its develop(er/ment team). Which is the reason we NEVER accept requests from end-users, we ONLY accept support requests from the vendor.
So in this case, don't ask us, ask WWIO for OpenPLi support...
The same is true for the HD61, in which case we've been asked by the vendor not to build an image for it.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
