12 replies to this topic

[Pr2]

Hi,

 

if you go into:

 

Menu - Plugins - OpenWebif configuration

 

At the bottom of the configuration screen there is: OpenWebif url:

 

For me this information remains empty but it should display the full url to call to access the box OpenWebif internally.

 

Does others have the same issue?

 

Thanks,

 

Pr2

 

 

[foxbob]

And I also have

 

Attached Files

•  1_0_16_3F0_A_70_1680000_0_0_0_20210420180238.jpg   98.95KB   5 downloads

[ccs]

Same on OpenViX.

[WanWizard]

self["lab1"] = Label("%s\n%s://%s:%d" % (_("OpenWebif url:"), owif_protocol, ip, owif_port))

It was changed 29 days ago, in https://github.com/E...327066e3223a417

 

I think the "\n" causes the text to wrap, and since there is only space for one line in the skin, the rest is not displayed. I've asked the author to remove it.

Edited by WanWizard, 20 April 2021 - 16:52.

[littlesat]

Again a config screen where it could be considered to move this info to the description instead of having a custom field and where we have an issue when there were descriptions here..... just like the address on the hdmi cec screen...
And maybe our default skin has two lines available....

Edited by littlesat, 20 April 2021 - 20:06.

[WanWizard]

This is OWIF code, we have no control / input over it. And no, our skin doesn't have two lines available, that is the problem, the second line is not visible.

[Matrix10]

Why don't you fix this

People think their webif doesn't work.

 

<screen name="OpenWebifConfig" position="fill" title="OpenWebif Configuration" flags="wfNoBorder">
<panel name="PigTemplate"/>
<widget name="config" position="780,100" size="1110,912" itemHeight="38" font="Regular;28" scrollbarMode="showOnDemand"/>
<widget name="lab1" position="780,935" halign="center" size="1110,80" zPosition="1" font="Regular;30" valign="top" transparent="1"/>
</screen>

[Matrix10]

I would ask those who are constantly changing skin coding in images

Pli / VIX /Oe-A

not to make unnecessary changes.

 

It becomes tedious to update skins for stupid coding changes.

I have to update thirty coding skins on our server as well.

Totally unnecessary.

[Guest-*0823016*]

I would ask those who are constantly changing skin coding in images
Pli / VIX /Oe-A
not to make unnecessary changes.

It becomes tedious to update skins for stupid coding changes.
I have to update thirty coding skins on our server as well.
Totally unnecessary.

Indeed.

[Pr2]

We are not responsible for Openwebif changes you have to complain on the Openwebif GitHub.
Openwebif is an independent project used by several images.

[Matrix10]

We are not responsible for Openwebif changes you have to complain on the Openwebif GitHub.
Openwebif is an independent project used by several images.

 

It is not directly related to the Pli team

but my general appeal to everyone who works on images and plugins to take care of coding changes and skins.

Namely, in recent months there have been several changes that are not in line with skin coding.

On the other hand, they were not needed because they did not contribute to any important improvement.

So this is a general request to take care of that.

Making some artificial changes after a decade , does not make sense if it does not contribute to anything.

Edited by Matrix10, 2 May 2021 - 09:59.

[Pr2]

Yes but on the other side we cannot stop developing or improve stuff just because "skinners" need to adapt there skins to follow the evolution. :-)

[Matrix10]

Yes but on the other side we cannot stop developing or improve stuff just because "skinners" need to adapt there skins to follow the evolution. :-)

 

We may have different opinions.

Unfortunately, all changes are made without a serious opinion of those on whom

these changes relate.Skinners.

 

I write about unnecessary changes and not about those that contribute to something.

In the world of skins, we almost don't have any significant improvements

expanding opportunities over the last nearly a decade.

These are changes that have not contributed much but have only replaced the existing possibilities.

 

I don’t know if it’s an improvement if you replace one line unnecessarily with two

or replace the OK button with two green and OK buttons.

I guess one is enough

Just to name a couple.