My et10k (fallbackclient without any tuners) survived the 438 updates by updating instead of reflashing this xtrend. It's running ok.
Posted 8 May 2021 - 19:33
My et10k (fallbackclient without any tuners) survived the 438 updates by updating instead of reflashing this xtrend. It's running ok.
2 x vu+ultimo4k ((nb & 9.0r) dvb-c fbc + 1 dvb-s2) + een vu+duo4k ((nb) fallbackclient) met een Synology ds214+ (2 x 6 TB) op DSM 7.1.1 in ziggo oost (voormalig @Home) + A1/A2/A3/HB (TechniSat)
Posted 8 May 2021 - 19:57
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 10 May 2021 - 00:13
As long as busybox isn't updated, it shouldn't be much of an issue.
The problem with busybox is a lot of packages depend on it, but don't define that dependency, so an update script can fall because of a missing busybox utility.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users