19 replies to this topic

[geisivi]

Vu+ uno 4k

Image develop

In file backupsuite.sh, line 446 there is an error.

 

line 446:

if [ $SEARCH = "zero4k" -o $SEARCH "uno4k" -o $SEARCH "uno4kse" -o $SEARCH "ultimo4k" -o $SEARCH "solo4k" -o $SEARCH "duo4k" -o $SEARCH "duo4kse" ] ; then

 

The solution is:

if [ $SEARCH = "zero4k" -o $SEARCH = "uno4k" -o $SEARCH = "uno4kse" -o $SEARCH = "ultimo4k" -o $SEARCH = "solo4k" -o $SEARCH = "duo4k" -o $SEARCH = "duo4kse" ] ; then

 

(putting = before all vu+ model names)

 

 

[WanWizard]

fix committed, thanks.

[Dimitrij]

 

The solution is:

if [ $SEARCH = "zero4k" -o $SEARCH = "uno4k" -o $SEARCH = "uno4kse" -o $SEARCH = "ultimo4k" -o $SEARCH = "solo4k" -o $SEARCH = "duo4k" -o $SEARCH = "duo4kse" ] ; then

thanks

[geisivi]

 backupsuite_bde14a0-r0.2_29092021.jpg   126.33KB   1 downloadsStill the same error on last develop update (29/09/2021).

 

 

[WanWizard]

Don't think the update is part of the latest develop yet.

 

And I saw PersianPrince pushed a history rewrite, so we'll have to see if that goes alright with the current build run (see the homepage for the status of the build).

 

edit: works fine on this mornings home build...

[geisivi]

 

edit: works fine on this mornings home build...

It doesn't works fine for me, this morning with last develop update.

I think the error is only for vu+ boxes.

[WanWizard]

I tested on a Duo 4K.

 

From your screenshot, I see you have an incorrect version. It should be:

 1_0_19_22C5_80D_2_11A0000_0_0_0_20210929121546.jpg   85.13KB   2 downloads

[geisivi]

It creates an image backup, but in vuplus/uno4k/ folder, the "nomkpart.update" file is missing.

[WanWizard]

It is present in my Duo 4K backup ( without bash error messages ).

[geisivi]

It is present in my Duo 4K backup ( without bash error messages ).

 

Your version is bde14a0-r0.2 ?

 

My backupsuite version installed today from openpli feeds, is bde14a0-r0.2. This version is different than others on github.

And have the problem above explained.

Perhaps Duo4k version is other in feeds.

 

(vu+uno4k, openpli8, develop. Today update).

 

I don't have any problem, because I've changed backupsuite.sh file, (with new line 446), and now no problem.

[foxbob]

I also have this version of the plugin, it’s not clear why. But the backup was created.

If - SRC_URI = "git://github.com/persianpros/BackupSuite-PLi.git;protocol=git" file is created - enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git536+bde14a0-r0_armv7ahf-neon.ipk

If - SRC_URI = "git://github.com/persianpros/BackupSuite-PLi.git;branch=master;protocol=git" file is created - enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git535+90665c3-r0_armv7ahf-neon.ipk

Plugin version     = bde14a0
Back-up media      = /hdd
Filesystem                Size      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1               111.2G     49.8G     60.3G  45% /media/hdd

Back-up = 2021.09.29_18:56
Version = openpli develop 
Flashed = 2021.09.28_19:52
Updated = 2021.09.29_18:56
Drivers = Enigma2 = 2021-09-28-develop


Working directory  = /hdd/bi
Not Open Vision, OpenPLi or SatDreamGr maybe?
Destination        = /hdd/fullbackup_ultimo4k/20210929_1856/vuplus/ultimo4k

RECEIVER = Vu+ Ultimo 4K 
MKUBIFS_ARGS = 
UBINIZE_ARGS = 
KERNEL размер резервной копии:   8192 KB
ROOTFS размер резервной копии: 961244 KB
=TOTAL размер резервной копии: 969436 KB (= 946 MB)
Пожалуйста, будьте терпеливы, создание резервной копии началось, это займёт около: 21.32 минут

*** FIRST SOME HOUSEKEEPING ***
Remove directory   = /hdd/bi
Recreate directory = /hdd/bi
Create directory   = /tmp/bi/root

Создаём: kerneldump
Kernel resides on /dev/mmcblk0p1
Создаём: root.ubifs
Removed directory  = /hdd/fullbackup_ultimo4k/20210929_1856/vuplus/ultimo4k
Created directory  = /hdd/fullbackup_ultimo4k/20210929_1856/vuplus/ultimo4k

USB прошивка создана в: /hdd/fullbackup_ultimo4k/20210929_1856/vuplus/ultimo4k
Содержание папки:
reboot.update
imageversion
kernel_auto.bin
rootfs.tar.bz2

Attached Files

•  1_0_1_7923_1F_FD_1680000_0_0_0_20210929192338.jpg   120.36KB   2 downloads

Edited by foxbob, 29 September 2021 - 17:31.

[WanWizard]

You can no longer compare git hashes.

 

The problem is that PersianPros rewrote history 11 hours ago, by deleting a few commits, creating a new one, and force push the result.

 

You need to build 90665c32b816fe5a8b74e334512b22e102fe0276 to have the correct version, and probably also do a "bitbake cleanall", as the commit counter went down from git536 to git535.

[geisivi]

I tested on a Duo 4K.

 

From your screenshot, I see you have an incorrect version. It should be:

1_0_19_22C5_80D_2_11A0000_0_0_0_20210929121546.jpg

 

You are right.

 

Menu-->Plugins-->Download plugins-->extensions-->backupsuite  install  bde14a0-r0.2 version (bad)

Menu-->Plugins-->Software management-->Advanced options-->Packet management-->enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite, install 90665c3-r0.0 versión (OK)

 

I've installed 90665c3-r0.0 version, and all is ok.

 

Thanks

[WanWizard]

Why would that install different versions? There is only one package feed.

[geisivi]

Why would that install different versions? There is only one package feed.

 

I don't know. There are 2 different versions in openpli development image. One from download plugins  (bde14a0-r0.2), and other one from Software management Packet management ( 90665c3-r0.0). For vu+uno4k. I don't know if it's the same for others vu+ models.

Edited by geisivi, 30 September 2021 - 16:18.

[WanWizard]

Don't understand it. This is online in the develop feed on the distribution server:

[root@openpli-dist openpli-develop]# find . -name "*backupsuite_*"
./armv7ahf-neon/enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git535+90665c3-r0.0_armv7ahf-neon.ipk
./mips32el/enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git535+90665c3-r0.0_mips32el.ipk
./cortexa15hf-neon-vfpv4/enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git535+90665c3-r0.0_cortexa15hf-neon-vfpv4.ipk
./armv7vehf-neon-vfpv4/enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git535+90665c3-r0.0_armv7vehf-neon-vfpv4.ipk
./mips32el-nf/enigma2-plugin-extensions-backupsuite_git535+90665c3-r0.0_mips32el-nf.ipk

all the correct version.

[WanWizard]

You could probably still see bde14a0-r0.2 because it has a git536 prefix, which makes it "newer" than what is now in the feed.

 

Because you had it already installed. With a newly flashed image you will probably not have this.

 

One more reason why rewritting git history is a VERY BAD idea...

[zeros]

Can you point me this commit from here?

https://github.com/p.../commits/master

I can't find it there!?

[WanWizard]

What commit?

 

This is NOW the correct one: https://github.com/p...12b22e102fe0276 which produced the " git535+90665c3".

 

The other commit no longer exists, that is the problem, PersianPros deleted and consolidated commits, the did a git force push which overwrote history from which an image was already built.

[zeros]

Oh, it's on the same commit, I didn't looked inside.. That Zgemma name just confused me!