Jump to content


Photo

CCcam 2.1.3


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 great-cccam

  • New Member
  • 2 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 27 November 2021 - 18:48

is there any how to get old CCcam2.1.3 on the new openPLI as it only shows CCcam2.3.2. is there way to added manually.

 

thanks in advance 



Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #2 mimisiku

  • Senior Member
  • 5,459 posts

+114
Excellent

Posted 27 November 2021 - 18:54

2.1.3?? Never heard of that one. Most new boxes are 4K with armhf SoC. So only CCcam 2.3.2.
Met één been in het graf..... Helaas

Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #3 great-cccam

  • New Member
  • 2 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 27 November 2021 - 19:03

2.1.3?? Never heard of that one. Most new boxes are 4K with armhf SoC. So only CCcam 2.3.2.

 

 

2.1.3 is an old softcam worked really well. CCcam2.3.2 stopped showing active clients/clients just stopped working tv doesnt work at my other house. 



Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #4 mrvica

  • Senior Member
  • 1,224 posts

+81
Good

Posted 27 November 2021 - 20:40

2.1.3 could be for ppc (power pc) SoC´s like old Dreamboxes



Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #5 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,508 posts

+1,733
Excellent

Posted 27 November 2021 - 21:29

Nope, 2.1.3 is beschikbaar voor alle architecturen, van ppc tot arm en x86.

 

https://downloads.op...CCcam-2.1.3.zip


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #6 mrvica

  • Senior Member
  • 1,224 posts

+81
Good

Posted 27 November 2021 - 21:59

I checked it inside zip (binary header), none is the armhf binary

armhf should be /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3

CCcam-armeb /lib/ld-linux.so.2

CCcam-armeb.eabi /lib/ld-linux.so.3



Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #7 WanWizard

  • PLi® Core member
  • 68,508 posts

+1,733
Excellent

Posted 28 November 2021 - 01:34

It is what it is...


Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Pro (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)

Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.

Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.


Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #8 s3n0

  • Senior Member
  • 640 posts

+62
Good

Posted 28 November 2021 - 09:53

The problem with CCcam is that the source code is closed. No developers can interfere so easily with CCcam source code because it is not freely available. There is a problem compiling or creating old versions of CCcam with support for new system libraries. If this is possible, then there is still a need to debug any bugs and issues with new versions of libraries. Of course, there is the possibility of linking old and new versions of libraries. But compatibility is not always 100% guaranteed with new system libraries.

 

I personally also use CCcam 2.3.0 because this version is the only one that works in my case (as a softcam client, in the IRDETO encoding system). Unfortunately, the other versions of CCcam (but also OSCam) do not work correctly in my case. Of course, I tried a lot of settings and versions. It is a problem of compatibility of SoftCAMs, with DVB technologies of specific SAT providers.



Re: CCcam 2.1.3 #9 Aliraza63

  • PLi® Tester
  • 250 posts

+23
Neutral

Posted 28 November 2021 - 13:29

 

2.1.3?? Never heard of that one. Most new boxes are 4K with armhf SoC. So only CCcam 2.3.2.

 

 

2.1.3 is an old softcam worked really well. CCcam2.3.2 stopped showing active clients/clients just stopped working tv doesnt work at my other house. 

 

Try 2.2.1 version its better for arm and mips to 


 DM-900 ,DM-520, Vu+Duo2



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users