Jump to content


Photo

Frequency Interference


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Spec7

  • New Member
  • 2 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 9 January 2022 - 20:16

Test on OpenPli Nightly builds and OpenPLi 8.1

 Device Used: VU+ UNO4KSE

 

Satellite: Al Yah 1 at 52.5°E

Frequency Interference: 11785 H 27500 3/4 And 12034 V 27500 3/4

 

When make search on 11785 All channels on 12034 disappear and vice versa and I get (Service not found!)
And each frequency swapping to other 11785 to 12034 AND 12034 to 11785 !!!
 
-_-  <_< 

Attached Files



Re: Frequency Interference #2 Pr2

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 6,227 posts

+262
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2022 - 20:20

This is because there is a duplication of the service reference between both frequency so you can only see the latest scanned one.


NO SUPPORT by PM, it is a forum make your question public so everybody can benefit from the question/answer.
If you think that my answer helps you, you can press the up arrow in bottom right of the answer.

Wanna help with OpenPLi Translation? Please read our Wiki Information for translators

Sat: Hotbird 13.0E, Astra 19.2E, Eutelsat5A 5.0W
VU+ Solo 4K: 2*DVB-S2 + 2*DVB-C/T/T2 (used in DVB-C) & Duo 4K: 2*DVB-S2X + DVB-C (FBC)

AB-Com: PULSe 4K 1*DVB-S2X (+ DVB-C/T/T2)
Edision OS Mio 4K: 1*DVB-S2X + 1*DVB-C/T/T2
 


Re: Frequency Interference #3 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,417 posts

+355
Excellent

Posted 9 January 2022 - 20:32

1)"Customize" --> "Ignore DVB-S namespace sub network" set no

2)Manual scan

"Network scan" no

"Clear before scan" yes


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: Frequency Interference #4 MCelliotG

  • Senior Member
  • 443 posts

+35
Good

Posted 9 January 2022 - 21:34

Plus you can change this setting temporarily for this sat scan only and set it back so you won't get duplicate entries on other satellites.
BTW your signals seem very strong for this satellite, where are you located?

Re: Frequency Interference #5 Spec7

  • New Member
  • 2 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 11 January 2022 - 14:45

This is because there is a duplication of the service reference between both frequency so you can only see the latest scanned one.

 

 

PS: This problem is not available in other images ... Example (BlackHole)



Re: Frequency Interference #6 Pr2

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 6,227 posts

+262
Excellent

Posted 11 January 2022 - 20:26

 

This is because there is a duplication of the service reference between both frequency so you can only see the latest scanned one.

 

 

PS: This problem is not available in other images ... Example (BlackHole)

 

 

See Dimitrij answer the default on other image is probably to keep the sub network in namespace


NO SUPPORT by PM, it is a forum make your question public so everybody can benefit from the question/answer.
If you think that my answer helps you, you can press the up arrow in bottom right of the answer.

Wanna help with OpenPLi Translation? Please read our Wiki Information for translators

Sat: Hotbird 13.0E, Astra 19.2E, Eutelsat5A 5.0W
VU+ Solo 4K: 2*DVB-S2 + 2*DVB-C/T/T2 (used in DVB-C) & Duo 4K: 2*DVB-S2X + DVB-C (FBC)

AB-Com: PULSe 4K 1*DVB-S2X (+ DVB-C/T/T2)
Edision OS Mio 4K: 1*DVB-S2X + 1*DVB-C/T/T2
 


Re: Frequency Interference #7 adriankoooo

  • Senior Member
  • 129 posts

+2
Neutral

Posted 11 January 2022 - 21:33

Disabling "Ignore namespace..." is not making problem elsewhere? See doglover's answer here: https://forums.openp...dpost&p=1418406



Re: Frequency Interference #8 FRAP

  • Senior Member
  • 348 posts

+24
Neutral

Posted 11 January 2022 - 23:29

Spec7

I noticed that all of your photos have a value for fec_inner: it's AUTO. This suggests that your satellites.xml provider is not doing its business! A self-respecting supplier transmits accurate frequency data !!! And does not put the frequency values at random (AUTO). In this case, your fec_inner = 3/4 in the entry it should look like this fec_inner = "3" :) 


Alcohol for wimps. Strong people enjoy depression.



3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users