37 replies to this topic

[Guest-*0823016*]

I was wondering why a nCam, possibly the official one, was not placed in the softcam panel?

From personal experience I find it more stable than the oScam.

[littlesat]

It is a 'fork' from oscam. It offers a feature that oscam does not support yet.

For know I can only find binary files from this oscam clone and we are also not aware if there might by additional features inside it you should avoid....

 

When someone knows where the sources are (they have to because when they follow the licenses from oscam) someone can create a recipe for it - and with the sources we can also fully confirm somehow that no 'surprises' are included.

[scriptmelvin †]

This github looks maintained.

[Guest-*0823016*]

I know that it is a derivative of oscam but I noticed that on my V + 4K it is faster in the channel change and even "opens" more on equal terms with the oscam.

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

[Jork]

More than 1000 MB of zipped data...?

Edited by Jork, 19 July 2022 - 12:28.

[Persian Prince]

Official git which we build from: https://github.com/fairbird/NCam

[littlesat]

Even better maintained…. But why diner get a fork from oscam instead of merging to oscam?

[Guest-*0823016*]

Even better maintained…. But why diner get a fork from oscam instead of merging to oscam?

This is to be understood!

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

[Guest-*0823016*]

By the way, have you tried to install the official version correctly?
I tried but failed while the unofficial ipk file installs correctly.
If you did, can you tell me how?
Thank you.

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

[Guest-*0823016*]

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

[Guest-*0823016*]

Has anyone ever tried? 

[Tech]

Well, to be honest, I did, yesterday I build a ncam build on my build server for a Ultimo4k but I still see no benefits compared with a normal oscam(-emu) build.

[Guest-*0823016*]

Well, to be honest, I did, yesterday I build a ncam build on my build server for a Ultimo4k but I still see no benefits compared with a normal oscam(-emu) build.

Simply done with ipk?

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

[littlesat]

Ncam has only one advantage… for specific encryption systems it downloads
key files from the www when it tries to encrypt a service via the emu and the key is not known. Something it seems is not offered via a merge request to oscam-emu.

Edited by littlesat, 1 August 2022 - 23:12.

[Tech]

 

Well, to be honest, I did, yesterday I build a ncam build on my build server for a Ultimo4k but I still see no benefits compared with a normal oscam(-emu) build.

Simply done with ipk?

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

 

My build environment also build the feeds so I was able to install ncam by using the green button, opkg did the job;)

 

yes it is an ipk packages.

[Guest-*0823016*]

By the way, have you tried to install the official version correctly?
I tried but failed while the unofficial ipk file installs correctly.
If you did, can you tell me how?
Thank you.

Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk

Everything ok but I was asking for this.

[Tech]

I build from the ‘official’ git sources.

[Guest-*0823016*]

I build from the ‘official’ git sources.

Ok but how to install?

[littlesat]

Ok but how to install?

->

Tech did build it for testing on his own private build environment.... so it cannot be installed from our public feeds (yet). This still depends on the real added value for this 'just another' rebranded fork from oscam.

 

I personally think we should strive to keep only the original -and- promote added value should be merged back to the original... So I think it is better to ask in the streamboard forum, the Oscam's home forum ,-or- maybe better arrange a merge request or comments on the oscam-emu github to get the added value implemented in the original Oscam(-emu) instead of promoting such rebranded fork.

Edited by littlesat, 2 August 2022 - 10:46.

[Guest-*0823016*]

Ok but how to install?

->

Tech did build it for testing on his own private build environment.... so it cannot be installed from our public feeds (yet). This still depends on the real added value for this 'just another' rebranded fork from oscam.

 

I personally think we should strive to keep only the original -and- promote added value should be merged back to the original... So I think it is better to ask in the streamboard forum, the Oscam's home, to get the added value implemented in Oscam instead of promoting a rebranded fork.

I don't want to install it from feed but personally.