
Inviato dal mio SM-G990B utilizzando Tapatalk
Posted 6 August 2022 - 08:29
I use this version.
Ncam run better than oscam on my Mutant HD2400.
PLi® Fan
Posted 6 August 2022 - 08:49
What works better in ncam? Note the basic is still the same as Oscam as it is just a fork of oscam… and in the code I do not see anything that can make it better…. So I just think it is gutfeeling….
Edited by littlesat, 6 August 2022 - 08:50.
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Posted 6 August 2022 - 10:22
The thing that I noticed despite being based on oscam is in my opinion in the channel change in general especially between satellite and digital terrestrial, another thing that I had previously written and that is the vision of a certain bouquet that on equal terms with oscam with this is ok.What works better in ncam? Note the basic is still the same as Oscam as it is just a fork of oscam… and in the code I do not see anything that can make it better…. So I just think it is gutfeeling….
PLi® Fan
Posted 6 August 2022 - 16:59
Well, to be honest, outside the fancy webinterface, I see no benefits at all if I compare ncam with oscam, and there’s no difference, ncam is just a fork from the oscam sources with some additions…..
I also use different sources like cable/satellite and see no problems here with switching between different conditional access id’s …. I even don’t like the ncam webinterface, in my opinion it is to ‘christmastree’ with no added value at all ……
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users