A tuner van be connected to either input one or input two...
So no fixes triple loops...
Edited by littlesat, 28 January 2016 - 17:28.
Posted 29 January 2016 - 11:37
Anyway, we (myself en athoik) have found several bugs in the VU+ supplied code, and besides, the code is really bad. It's full of copy-and-paste art. We already reduced it to about half it's size and still continueing. We want to finish that job before we're going to release. But it won't take long now.
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Posted 29 January 2016 - 12:39
Anyway, we (myself en athoik) have found several bugs in the VU+ supplied code, and besides, the code is really bad. It's full of copy-and-paste art. We already reduced it to about half it's size and still continueing. We want to finish that job before we're going to release.
Good work! Better a long wait and a job well done than the other way around!
Why is it that I'm not surprised VU didn't do a professional job.....
Posted 9 February 2016 - 14:11
What are the community feelings about the chances that FBC tuners can enable STBs to tune to MIS (Multiple Input Stream) transponders?
Edited by athoik, 9 February 2016 - 14:12.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 14:12
MIS support will be part of OpenPLi 5, for tuners that support it. Athiok is working on that. I don't think that as of today, any of the existing boxes do though.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 15:41
What are the community feelings about the chances that FBC tuners can enable STBs to tune to MIS (Multiple Input Stream) transponders?
Where did you find the information that FBC tuners can tune to MIS?
(currently it works for sure using TBS cards with some patches from crazycat for STV and Enigma2, also PLS works, T2-MI will be the next to test)
I'm not stating it does. I am asking about the chances it can be done.
Because, as I see it, with FBC I would say the physical limitation is not there anymore. It should all come down to driver/ SW implementation.
But I'm not sure, hence I'm asking. I believe it should be possible to tune to MIS and also anyother different type of modulations with FBC hardware and the right low-level SW development.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 19:19
The difference between "normal" and "multistream" is tiny. So I guess any tuner can handle it, if instructed properly. I also guess that's not going to happen, because mult-streams are used for distribution, which they now can do without scrambling. It's a bit comparable to 8PSK on DVB and 16/32PSK on DVB-S2. It's probably very well possible to support, but restricted by "the powers that be". So little chance to be released for consumer devices, including FBC.
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 19:25
There seems to be a problem with FBC/Unicable.
Tested on 2 different setups at different locations.
1) Solo4K, LNB Inverto IDLB-QUDL42-UNI2L-1PP, Tuner A, Advanced, Unicable, SCR 1, 28 East. Tuner C, Advanced, Unicable, linked to tuner A SCR 2.
2) Solo4K, LNB Inverto IDLU-32UL40-UNBOO-OPP, Tuner A, Advanced, Unicable, SCR 1, 28 East. Tuner C, Advanced, Unicable, linked to tuner A SCR 2.
Start a recording on tuner A. Zap to another channel. Tuner C is now active. Stop recording on tuner A (automatically or manually). Now there is picture break up on tuner C, or no picture at all.
Or just set tuner C as preferred, and there will always be picture break up.
All recordings and viewed channels work fine until the root tuner is not in use.
Edited by Huevos, 9 February 2016 - 19:27.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 19:45
Edited by Erik Slagter, 9 February 2016 - 19:48.
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 19:59
Edited by athoik, 9 February 2016 - 20:00.
Posted 9 February 2016 - 20:28
---- links tuner 0, prev_links: , next_links: 2, tuner 1, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 2, prev_links: 0, , next_links: tuner 3, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 4, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 5, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 6, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 7, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 8, prev_links: , next_links: tuner 9, prev_links: , next_links: ++++ links < 975.250110> [eDVBFrontend] dont close frontend 0 until the linked frontend 2 in slot 2 is still in use < 977.486624> [eMainloop::processOneEvent] unhandled POLLERR/HUP/NVAL for fd 37(16) < 980.290381> action -> InfobarShowHideActions toggleShow < 1021.602815> action -> InfobarShowHideActions toggleShow < 1035.250368> [eDVBFrontend] dont close frontend 0 until the linked frontend 2 in slot 2 is still in use < 1095.250580> [eDVBFrontend] dont close frontend 0 until the linked frontend 2 in slot 2 is still in use < 1155.250964> [eDVBFrontend] dont close frontend 0 until the linked frontend 2 in slot 2 is still in use < 1215.251489> [eDVBFrontend] dont close frontend 0 until the linked frontend 2 in slot 2 is still in useWhat happens in unicable scenario?
Edited by athoik, 9 February 2016 - 20:29.
Posted 10 February 2016 - 00:34
Well, I can confirm that thanks to Athoik's tireless efforts we have a flawlessly working MIS implementation on an Openpli5/SatDreamGr experimental image he compiled for tests on my VuDuo and my TBS5925 USB card! Channels are scanned and zapped in lightining speed, a lot faster than they do on pc, and the USALS/diseqc motor works very very fast and accurately as well!
Here are a bunch of screenshots I just took!
11179V 5W (RAI)
As a DXer myself, and personally speaking, I find it so funny to see exact and non-ending SNR in db on a Vu+ receiver, as we all know the drivers they provide are useless for someone to measure the signal in accuracy! Not the case anymore!
We are currently working on T2-MI and more stuff we'd like to see, currently I haven't tested yet if the tuner locks APSK modulations although I'm optimistic it does, and blindscan for this tuner!
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users