The amount of room on the left in the servicename field seems a bit overzealous indeed. It looks like an old bug in the standard GMEPG implementation; I'll look into it.Left service name alignment is also with the PLi Scale HD Skin not really left, see attachement. (same for centered, not really centered)
Problems with GraphMultiEPG
Started by Dimitrij, 21 Jan 2013 20:11
116 replies to this topic
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #101
Posted 15 February 2013 - 00:34
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #102
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #103
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #104
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #105
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #106
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #107
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #108
Posted 17 February 2013 - 13:39
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #109
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #110
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #111
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #112
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #113
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #114
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #115
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #116
Re: Problems with GraphMultiEPG #117
Posted 7 March 2013 - 20:22
I suggest that room is there when you enable to show picons while they are not available for that channel... When you configure channel name only or arrange picons it should be better
Makes sense. Probably a false alarm indeed.
indeed, false alarm. thanks for your time.
ET4000
PLi-HD Skin
PLi-HD Skin
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users