I don't intend to say any more then what I said. I can't look into anybody's head.......Does this mean you say that VU+ doesn't care about our request and find support of "PLi" not important point?
LOL: I just got a reply back from VU+ stating that in their image and also in the images based on that, there seems to be no problem.
Now you and I know the cause of this, but I really need to have some strong arguments as to why in images with an other basis there is a (driver related) problem indeed. My statement 'it doesn't work in PLi' doesn't seem to be very impressive. The more (objective) arguments I can give them, the more chance we have in getting this fixed.
All I want is to get as many arguments as possible to support PLi's request.