Is that already actually done in this casze? I mean, OS taken by a corp and made into closed source?!?
If it is - it's abominable! In that case - boycott!!!
Posted 15 October 2013 - 17:53
Is that already actually done in this casze? I mean, OS taken by a corp and made into closed source?!?
If it is - it's abominable! In that case - boycott!!!
Posted 15 October 2013 - 19:20
It's closed source. So nothing can be proven. So I don't make statements or point fingers.
But when you see features appear that look the same and do the same, as I said, it makes you wonder if someone really thought "that is a good idea, let me build that too", and do that from scratch without looking at whats openly available...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 15 October 2013 - 19:24
OK, found something:
http://forum.abipbox.com/ http://update.prismcube.com/addons-frodo/
http://update.prismc...uby_v1.xxx.xxx/
VU+ Ultimo 4K - 78 Triax met triple Quad
Posted 15 October 2013 - 19:27
VU+ Ultimo 4K - 78 Triax met triple Quad
Posted 15 October 2013 - 19:32
Blackhole has an Enigma2 image too. On top of the closed source (i.e. binary only) image from DMM. Doesn't say anything...
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 15 October 2013 - 19:35
Ahem... Seem to mix up two threads here... Ignore what I wrote (except the part about the fastscan code).
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 15 October 2013 - 19:58
Posted 15 October 2013 - 20:40
From what I can see on their website, the XMBC part is open.
But the rest, and that includes all DVB stuff, isn't there. XMBC needs to talk to a DVB backend to provide the TV and PVR features.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 15 October 2013 - 21:01
Posted 15 October 2013 - 21:04
not really, it's a binary release...you may find this maruapp thing interesting:
http://update.prismc...=prismcube-ruby
Posted 16 October 2013 - 01:10
So, while waiting for the definitive answer to the above question of appropriating Open Source code and closing it or not.... let's go back to some of the earlier, pertinent questions:
1) A/V Codecs supported?
2) Consumption?
3) EXT2/3/4 supported?
4) Recording to NTFS?
5) HDMI 1.4?
6) USB 3?
7) 2xHD PiP?
8) How many (HD) channels can we record at the same time?
9) Which emus/CS SW?
Etc. etc.
Thanx!
Posted 16 October 2013 - 02:44
Posted 16 October 2013 - 07:29
Only the XMBC shell is open source, the rest, including all DVB stuff, isn't.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 16 October 2013 - 08:35
Posted 16 October 2013 - 08:46
If they are different components, for example a separate library (that is not compiled in) or a separate application, the answer is "yes, the GPL license allows that". Like it is allowed to use closed-source drivers in Linux.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 16 October 2013 - 09:41
Yeah, but things that are not allowed happen often enough, so that doesn't mean anything.
Why not?is a closed source addition to an open source image allowed?
E.g. there are enough plugins closed source.....
So using this definition, would the PrismCube be Open/CLosed/Partially Open?If they are different components, for example a separate library (that is not compiled in) or a separate application, the answer is "yes, the GPL license allows that". Like it is allowed to use closed-source drivers in Linux.
Posted 16 October 2013 - 09:48
Or as Pop_eye asked/stated earlier:
Will the linuxtv api still be used with this project or not ?
There are two aspects:
1. if the answer is YES - then the tuners and all the pvr / ca interfacing code should be needed to be released aswell.
It is exactly this portion which both DM and vuplus are both failing to do since their code is interfaced with broadcom proprietary api.
And since much of this code is using dvb-core components..guess what ? They are breaking GNU license.
2. if the answer is NO - then another layer of interfacing should needs to be built from ground to respect XBMC requirements.
This is exactly what gorski and others are reading between the lines...this is what open source is all about.
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users