Posted 22 June 2018 - 18:34
sumo is a feature branch, and still a work in progress, at the moment is doesn't build error free yet. As soon as sumo is ready, it will be merged back into develop, and we'll start work on OpenPLi 7.0.
And it looks like betacentauri needs to remove his patch branches... 
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 22 June 2018 - 18:51
And it looks like betacentauri needs to remove his patch branches...
Anyone with write access should be able to delete them.
Posted 22 June 2018 - 18:54
Deleted. Didn't know that I'm allowed to do it.
Posted 22 June 2018 - 18:59
Down to 12.
Posted 22 June 2018 - 20:38
Anyone with write access should be able to delete them.
I know that, but I'm not in the business of deleting someone elses branches. The creator can delete them when they are no longer needed.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 22 June 2018 - 20:48
Posted 22 June 2018 - 20:54
I'm not really bothered by a branch more or less. It isn't that they take up a lot of space.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Posted 23 June 2018 - 06:50
https://github.com/O...igma2/pull/1617 without changing the file encoding (github did it before not me)
https://github.com/O...e-core/pull/485 (Info added)
https://github.com/O...e-core/pull/489 was ok, pieterg said:
https://github.com/O...mment-396677720
And I did add it to the bsp.
Edited by Persian Prince, 23 June 2018 - 06:51.
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
Posted 23 June 2018 - 08:09
Posted 24 June 2018 - 08:25
See my comments in Github.
I did test the patch: https://github.com/O...e-core/pull/485
You can apply my merge request if you want, we have it anyway 
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:23
https://github.com/O...igma2/pull/1619 regarding dvb-t2 missing FECs
Did you see these codes: https://github.com/O...up.py#L279~L290 ?
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:55
https://github.com/O...igma2/pull/1619 updated, it's not just missing FECs for dvb-t2 also we have FEC 6/7 missing in PLi's enigma2 sources for dvb-c2/s2
It's a merge regarding missing FECs for dvb-c2/t2/s2 with sort.
Edited by Persian Prince, 24 June 2018 - 09:56.
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
Posted 24 June 2018 - 09:57
As far I understood we first need some upstream fixes in the kernel stuff, then politely ask the manufacturers to adjust tot these upstream enum values... 
WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W
Posted 24 June 2018 - 10:04
As far I understood we first need some upstream fixes in the kernel stuff, then politely ask the manufacturers to adjust tot these upstream enum values...
No that's for dvb-s2 new FECs which I didn't add
Only FEC 6/7 added in python for dvb-c2/s2 as we had it in cpp part
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
Posted 25 June 2018 - 09:23
https://github.com/O...igma2/pull/1619
https://github.com/O...e-core/pull/496
Extra:
Also I did change "libdvbsi++_0.3.8" to our git with applied patches: https://github.com/P..._0.3.8.bbappend
As dreambox git sucks now we have libdvbsi + patches here: https://github.com/PLi-metas/libdvbsi
Is it ok to be in PLi's OE too?
Edited by Persian Prince, 25 June 2018 - 09:24.
Open Vision sources: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
