Jump to content


Photo

merge requests for PLi's git


  • Please log in to reply
1367 replies to this topic

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #21 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,704 posts

+234
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 10:30

ok guys understood :)

 

i was working on dreambox UBIFS for your OE Core : https://sourceforge....rge-requests/6/


If you like my post click on green arrow :)

 

Open Vision image for your STB: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #22 pieterg

  • PLi® Core member
  • 32,766 posts

+245
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 10:44

Yes I noticed.
Before I merge those, I want to discuss this internally, because it has some implication.
However, as several dreamboxes suffer from boot problems after the driver updates, now might be the time to deliver all the bad at once.

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #23 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,704 posts

+234
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 10:50

sure , i just wanna help if i can

 

also there was another merge request : https://sourceforge....0882cb4b21ede6/ (i'm not sure that you saw it or not)


If you like my post click on green arrow :)

 

Open Vision image for your STB: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #24 adri

  • Senior Member
  • 368 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 18 April 2013 - 11:28

ok guys understood :)

 

i was working on dreambox UBIFS for your OE Core : https://sourceforge....rge-requests/6/

Persian Prince,

 

I see you are removing a previous patch meta-openpli/recipes-linux/linux/linux-dreambox-3.2/0001-disable-broken-brcm-shared-uart-irq-support-for-bcm7.patch.

This was added by DMM on January 10th 2013, to fix a problem with irq's, see http://git.opendream...d11b4760e229b6a

Without this patch, the DM8000 box will become unresponsive to the remote control after a while.

 

Why is it removed, since it has nothing to do with UBIFS?



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #25 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,704 posts

+234
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 11:40

i think you should ask DMM not me : http://git.opendream...f2a82d5e127bf2a

 

;)


If you like my post click on green arrow :)

 

Open Vision image for your STB: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #26 adri

  • Senior Member
  • 368 posts

+5
Neutral

Posted 18 April 2013 - 11:51

i think you should ask DMM not me : http://git.opendream...f2a82d5e127bf2a

 

;)

Thanks,

 

I just discovered it in their git.

it seems to be no longer needed when kernel 3.2.41 is used.



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #27 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 45,366 posts

+499
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 16:33

Please do not merge this ugly patch.

What is exact ugly here? The only thing I can come up with is that afaik none of our supported receivers support these rates?

EDIT: didn't notice it didn't patch the autoresolution plugin, sorry.

Edited by Erik Slagter, 18 April 2013 - 18:25.

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E/9E/4.8E/0.8W/5W via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
* Ziggo digital cable TV (FTA)
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #28 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 45,366 posts

+499
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 16:50

https://sourceforge....rge-requests/1/
 
https://sourceforge....8e435c79545e61/
 
blindscan 3.2 for all vuplus models but as you know dvb-s is possible for vuultimo , vuuno and vuduo2
 
also 20130207 driver update for all vuplus models except vusolo2

I didn't incorporate this driver version because (according to the changelog) it didn't bring anything useful for non-solo2 receivers.

EDIT: I see pieterg committed the whole bunch: 6afa9259ee788dfe98ed9669e0b4005abb3b1b16

Edited by Erik Slagter, 18 April 2013 - 18:15.

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E/9E/4.8E/0.8W/5W via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
* Ziggo digital cable TV (FTA)
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #29 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 45,366 posts

+499
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 18:17

https://sourceforge....rge-requests/2/
 
https://sourceforge....004fccc0251950/
 
20130325 driver update for all dreambox models , changelogs mentioned here : http://git.opendream...5b391bd35b14681
 
also secondstage 87 for dm7020hd that supports new dm7020hdv2 with new flash chip , more info : http://git.opendream...39743a6a7375de5

For my "administration": pieterg: 7fc65f42d9b0d8edeff58ebfa60ed0487766133f
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E/9E/4.8E/0.8W/5W via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
* Ziggo digital cable TV (FTA)
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #30 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 45,366 posts

+499
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 18:18

https://sourceforge....rge-requests/3/
 
https://sourceforge....86dd70e314dbd0/
 
some tweaks for less image size
 
more python compile and more py source removing

pieterg: c4e94f98ca6ddfe015b2ded6df9e3c14976a04b6 (reverted: e5050e70d995546f16985597b2036f47c905bbeb)
* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E/9E/4.8E/0.8W/5W via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
* Ziggo digital cable TV (FTA)
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #31 malakudi

  • PLi® Core member
  • 1,447 posts

+66
Good

Posted 18 April 2013 - 18:52

Since last updates, we have many enigma2-plugin packages with binary only and -src with source python files. The "problem" is that in the plugin management, you see all those packages twice. One normal and one -src. 

for example, enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-softwaremanager and enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-softwaremanager-src, enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-skinselector and enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-skinselector-src etc etc



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #32 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,704 posts

+234
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 19:30

normal users only need compiled packages with pyo files not with py files (sources)

 

it will help to reduce the image size and prevent compiling on the box


If you like my post click on green arrow :)

 

Open Vision image for your STB: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #33 gutemine

  • Senior Member
  • 873 posts

+68
Good

Posted 18 April 2013 - 19:46

And it cripples the great enigma2 Open Source PLi approach ...



Re: merge requests for PLi's git #34 Sjaaky

  • Senior Member
  • 7,442 posts

+41
Good

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:11

Well, if you are skilled enough to edit python, you're skilled enough to opkg install the sources.

Re: merge requests for PLi's git #35 gutemine

  • Senior Member
  • 873 posts

+68
Good

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:16

You didn't get the point. It doesn't help that a cripple can use a wheelchair.

 

PS: And Sorry for the wording - I'm not making any jokes on handicapped people.


Edited by gutemine, 18 April 2013 - 20:17.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #36 offnow

  • Senior Member
  • 56 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:20

Since last updates, we have many enigma2-plugin packages with binary only and -src with source python files. The "problem" is that in the plugin management, you see all those packages twice. One normal and one -src. 

for example, enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-softwaremanager and enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-softwaremanager-src, enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-skinselector and enigma2-plugin-systemplugins-skinselector-src etc etc

 

I think you do not understand what he wants...

 

Could we change the softwaremanagment to show only the plugins - and as an extra point install the sources of the installed plugins?

 

For sure it is in python string handling


Edited by notavail, 18 April 2013 - 20:21.

hab keine Lust mehr...

Viel Spaß allen und lebt wohl


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #37 Persian Prince

  • Senior Member
  • 1,704 posts

+234
Excellent

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:29

And it cripples the great enigma2 Open Source PLi approach ...

 

you're kidding right ?

 

PLi is #1 open source enigma throughout the world and splitting packages won't change that


If you like my post click on green arrow :)

 

Open Vision image for your STB: https://github.com/OpenVisionE2


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #38 gutemine

  • Senior Member
  • 873 posts

+68
Good

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:36

src and dev packages have different meanings and python is designed for compiling when running, but if you start ignoring such enigma2 design principles and feel comfortable...

 

As I'm pretty sure that our friends are NOT shipping most of their Plugins without py just to save space and avoid compilation this move is simply suspicious - especially together with such arguments. If DMM would do such a move they would be grilled once more :)

 

But I'm just pointing out the personal opinion of a dumb person which doesn't understand the enigma2 community and Open Source.

 

And actually you are not splitting you are multiplying keeping different CPU architectures in mind.


Edited by gutemine, 18 April 2013 - 20:39.


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #39 offnow

  • Senior Member
  • 56 posts

+8
Neutral

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:43

python only have to recompile if there is something changed - so there is no need for such a waste of free space.

If you want to see the code only install the source - where is the problem with this?

 

Try to push some buttons on fb - it is very easy (as I can do it, everyone can do it)


Edited by notavail, 18 April 2013 - 20:44.

hab keine Lust mehr...

Viel Spaß allen und lebt wohl


Re: merge requests for PLi's git #40 gutemine

  • Senior Member
  • 873 posts

+68
Good

Posted 18 April 2013 - 20:48

The dumb users will simply decide if they like it :)

 

PS: I should not use this word anymore, or I will have to wash my mouth with soap ... again.

 

PPS: And PLi always told everybody how slim their images are and that they don't have any space problems that now suddenly need to be solved.


Edited by gutemine, 18 April 2013 - 20:49.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users