Jump to content


Photo

NFS mount at command line level

nfs

  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 gspock

  • Senior Member
  • 113 posts

+3
Neutral

Posted 26 January 2014 - 10:46

Hi all,

brand new here and new to VU+Duo2 installed with most recent OpenPLi image.

I have the follwoing issue :

I am trying to mount and nfs share on a NAS system but getting stuck with this error :

mount: mounting 192.168.1.189:/mnt/pools/A/A0/Temp-ix2-200 on /media/hdd/PVR/ix2-200 failed: Connection refused

 

My command read the following:

mount -t nfs 192.168.1.189:/mnt/pools/A/A0/Temp-ix2-200 /media/hdd/PVR/ix2-200

 

I must also indicate that I have correctly set-up the permission on the NAS (r/w access to my vuduo2 ip address), and that the target directory is accessible on my Western Digital media player via nfs mount.

 

Any idea ?

Thanks,

GS


VU+ DUO-4K-SE with 1 DBV-C and 1TB Hitachi HDD, OpenPLi 8.3


Re: NFS mount at command line level #2 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 26 January 2014 - 10:59

Nothing is listening on that address/port...

 

You might want to try -p udp, maybe your NAS doesn't offer tcp transport.


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: NFS mount at command line level #3 gspock

  • Senior Member
  • 113 posts

+3
Neutral

Posted 26 January 2014 - 17:16

Nothing is listening on that address/port...

 

You might want to try -p udp, maybe your NAS doesn't offer tcp transport.

Thanks for your answer.

As said, my Western digital Media player has several NFS mounts on that NAS, so I guess the issue is not with the NAS ... ;)

 

what do you mean by " try -p udp" .. ? doing a mount --h does not indicate "-p udp" as option .... :huh:


VU+ DUO-4K-SE with 1 DBV-C and 1TB Hitachi HDD, OpenPLi 8.3


Re: NFS mount at command line level #4 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 26 January 2014 - 17:27

I'm sorry, I meant -o udp. Other -o options may also help:

 

-o nolock

-o nfsvers=2


Edited by Erik Slagter, 26 January 2014 - 17:28.

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: NFS mount at command line level #5 gspock

  • Senior Member
  • 113 posts

+3
Neutral

Posted 27 January 2014 - 06:09

Thanks Erik, but same error ....

 

what I am looking for is a kind of doc. about the mount command on OpenPLi, because it seems the syntax is diiferent from other linux systems I know.

 

I still do not get where is the wrong option in my statement :

mount -t nfs 192.168.1.189:/mnt/pools/A/A0/Temp-ix2-200 /media/hdd/PVR/ix2-200

 

This statement works perfectly when issued from a Synology systems toward my other NAS ....


VU+ DUO-4K-SE with 1 DBV-C and 1TB Hitachi HDD, OpenPLi 8.3


Re: NFS mount at command line level #6 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 27 January 2014 - 10:28

It's the mount command from busybox, not OpenPLi.

 

Is rpcbind running locally?


* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: NFS mount at command line level #7 gregoire

  • Senior Member
  • 82 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 27 February 2014 - 10:53

I think it's a know bug that current image don't have running rpcbind : nfsserver broken in 4.0?.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users