Jump to content


Photo

What's the point in this commit?


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

Re: What's the point in this commit? #21 2boom

  • Senior Member
  • 100 posts

+17
Neutral

Posted 20 October 2014 - 19:51

+1

signal is absent if option not present



Re: What's the point in this commit? #22 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 20 October 2014 - 20:54

 

This option("Send DiSEqC") has been configured for many years until Huevos not deleted it.

 

+1

without this option "there is no signal"...

 

Then your LNB/Multiswitch is faulty. If you need this go 'Advanced' and set up the LNB that desn't work to DiSEqC Port A. Or send your LNB back as faulty. BTW, just so I don't get caught out, what is the brand of these garbage LNBs.

 

And by the way I've been an installer a long time and I've never come across an LNB that needs a DiSEqC command. I'm starting to think the people asking for this are from another dimension.


Edited by Huevos, 20 October 2014 - 20:58.


Re: What's the point in this commit? #23 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 02:13

If you need this go 'Advanced' and set up the LNB that desn't work to DiSEqC Port A.

Exactly. What's the point of having a 'simple' setting for a simple set up, if you want to add advanced items that are readily available in the advanced setup?

Anyway: if it stays this way, I expect a huge help-text to explain what the setting does and what it is intended for.


PS: Instead of "+1" I would really like to hear why people don't want to use the advanced setting and do want to complicate things for normal, 'simple' users.

Re: What's the point in this commit? #24 martina3

  • Member
  • 1 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 October 2014 - 03:27

+1

signal is absent if option not present

+1



Re: What's the point in this commit? #25 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 04:57

This is not a democracy: a vote doesn't help you, an explanation why you are not able to use 'advanced' for an advanced setting might....


Edited by SatKiekerd, 21 October 2014 - 04:57.


Re: What's the point in this commit? #26 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,322 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 05:31

again-->read SatKiekerd

This option("Send DiSEqC") has been configured for many years until Huevos not deleted it.

But the other users in the spring, due to the removal of this setting, there were problems.


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: What's the point in this commit? #27 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 06:14

Yes, I read.

And I know.

And I also know why it has been deleted.

And I think you must also have read what the reasoning behind that is?

 

Of course: innovation means that not all things should remain the same forever; on the contrary.

 

But in spite of asking several times, nobody answered the question why people with an advanced (or if you prefer: exceptional) setup are not able to use the advanced settings? After all that's what they are available for.....



Re: What's the point in this commit? #28 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 06:25

Or are you implying that no Russian PLi-user could watch any telly since this superfluous setting has been removed?



Re: What's the point in this commit? #29 littlesat

  • PLi® Core member
  • 57,154 posts

+698
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 07:54

I think it is better to make a simple universal and simple rotating comfig here.....

WaveFrontier 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 7E | 5E | 1W | 4/5W | 15W


Re: What's the point in this commit? #30 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 08:31

Rotating has already a simple setup; even two!



Re: What's the point in this commit? #31 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 10:28

Rotating has already a simple setup; even two!

He means circular.

 

I think it is better to make a simple universal and simple rotating comfig here.....

Ok, but just so you know, a Universal LNB always has the same local oscillator frequencies. Whereas with Circular polarised LNBs there are at least 5 common local oscillator frequencies, which is why I was asking the question, why does this Circular polarised LNB local oscillator frequeny take priority over the other 4 common ones? And is why I was suggesting that maybe this particular LNB is getting promoted to the Simple config because that is what suits someone's personal needs... Just like the other stupid option that has returned.



Re: What's the point in this commit? #32 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,322 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 12:51

Remove everything and close the topic.


GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: What's the point in this commit? #33 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 13:05

+1  :)



Re: What's the point in this commit? #34 Erik Slagter

  • PLi® Core member
  • 46,969 posts

+541
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 13:44

.


Edited by Erik Slagter, 21 October 2014 - 13:45.

* Wavefrontier T90 with 28E/23E/19E/13E via SCR switches 2 x 2 x 6 user bands
I don't read PM -> if you have something to ask or to report, do it in the forum so others can benefit. I don't take freelance jobs.
Ik lees geen PM -> als je iets te vragen of te melden hebt, doe het op het forum, zodat anderen er ook wat aan hebben.


Re: What's the point in this commit? #35 Ivanyh

  • Member
  • 4 posts

0
Neutral

Posted 21 October 2014 - 14:41

+1

signal is absent if option not present

+1



Re: What's the point in this commit? #36 athoik

  • PLi® Core member
  • 8,458 posts

+327
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 16:20

Why nobody creates a guide how to use "advanced settings" with 36E sattelite and post it here? (Instead of turning simple into "simple advanced settings")
Wavefield T90: 0.8W - 1.9E - 4.8E - 13E - 16E - 19.2E - 23.5E - 26E - 33E - 39E - 42E - 45E on EMP Centauri DiseqC 16/1
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916

Re: What's the point in this commit? #37 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 16:42

Why nobody creates a guide how to use "advanced settings" with 36E sattelite and post it here? (Instead of turning simple into "simple advanced settings")

 

Probably for the very same reason that nobody answered the question why 'advanced' isn't been used.....



Re: What's the point in this commit? #38 Dimitrij

  • PLi® Core member
  • 10,322 posts

+350
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 17:09

Why nobody creates a guide how to use "advanced settings" with 36E sattelite and post it here? (Instead of turning simple into "simple advanced settings")

Why?
I wanted to do it for the convenience of users of the former CIS countries for many years to come.
Without reading the instructions.
But as always in Europe, own 'I' above all else.

 

Remove these settings.


Edited by Dima73, 21 October 2014 - 17:09.

GigaBlue UHD Quad 4K /Lunix3-4K/Duo 4K


Re: What's the point in this commit? #39 Huevos

  • PLi® Contributor
  • 4,654 posts

+162
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 17:43

Dima this isn't a Europe versus Russian Federation debate. It's just a case of trying to keep simple simple.

Re: What's the point in this commit? #40 Rob van der Does

  • Senior Member
  • 7,766 posts

+184
Excellent

Posted 21 October 2014 - 17:47

But as always in Europe, own 'I' above all else.

Quite a rude, harsh comment, my friend. And to me it looks more to be the other way around...

And still no answer to why you can't use 'advanced', still no little 'how-to-use-advanced', still no answer to the question what the LNB's brand is...

Only complaining, and repeating the same over and over again.....

Well, a '+1'from me for your last statement......


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users