full ci+ support
Re: full ci+ support #141
Posted 28 March 2017 - 20:05
I guess next time we/I should check bugs before investigating
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #142
Re: full ci+ support #143
Posted 28 March 2017 - 20:24
https://bugzilla.gno...g.cgi?id=775774
He would probably warn us, but he left OpenPLi
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #145
Posted 28 March 2017 - 21:17
Once you realize that ca-certificates is not used, things are getting easy!
Edited by athoik, 28 March 2017 - 21:17.
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #146
Re: full ci+ support #147
Posted 28 March 2017 - 21:26
Hello @athoik,
I just left IPTVPlayer because of you know who.
There is one more problem with TLS backend based on OpenSSL.
You need to add another patch to call function
SSL_set_tlsext_host_name(ssl, servername)
to set server domain otherwise SNI will not be works.
This is also simple patch:
You can check were gnutls_server_name_set (this is GnuTLS equivalent) is called in GnuTLS backend.
Regards,
SSS
Edited by samsamsam, 28 March 2017 - 21:29.
Re: full ci+ support #148
Posted 28 March 2017 - 22:28
Regarding SNI, I guess the following will do the job
It seems that nobody is really looking on their bugtracker, but I will post the patch a see if they going to review it.
Till then, most probably patches can be added to our bitbake.
BTW, I followed your advice and totally get rid of gnutls to master-next, by switch to OpenSSL other packages as well. Images reduced few MB!
diff --git a/tls/openssl/gtlsclientconnection-openssl.c b/tls/openssl/gtlsclientconnection-openssl.c index cb9e647..26f4449 100644 --- a/tls/openssl/gtlsclientconnection-openssl.c +++ b/tls/openssl/gtlsclientconnection-openssl.c @@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ g_tls_client_connection_openssl_initable_init (GInitable *initable, GTlsClientConnectionOpenssl *client = G_TLS_CLIENT_CONNECTION_OPENSSL (initable); GTlsClientConnectionOpensslPrivate *priv; long options; + const char *hostname; priv = g_tls_client_connection_openssl_get_instance_private (client); @@ -437,25 +438,21 @@ g_tls_client_connection_openssl_initable_init (GInitable *initable, } options = SSL_OP_NO_TICKET; + hostname = get_server_identity (client); /* Only TLS 1.2 or higher */ SSL_CTX_set_options (priv->ssl_ctx, options); #if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x10200000L - { - const char *hostname; - - hostname = get_server_identity (client); - if (hostname) - { - X509_VERIFY_PARAM *param; - - param = X509_VERIFY_PARAM_new (); - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_host (param, hostname); - SSL_CTX_set1_param (priv->ssl_ctx, param); - X509_VERIFY_PARAM_free (param); - } - } + if (hostname) + { + X509_VERIFY_PARAM *param; + + param = X509_VERIFY_PARAM_new (); + X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_host (param, hostname); + SSL_CTX_set1_param (priv->ssl_ctx, param); + X509_VERIFY_PARAM_free (param); + } #endif SSL_CTX_set_generate_session_id (priv->ssl_ctx, generate_session_id); @@ -477,6 +474,11 @@ g_tls_client_connection_openssl_initable_init (GInitable *initable, data_index = SSL_get_ex_new_index (0, "gtlsclientconnection", NULL, NULL, NULL); SSL_set_ex_data (priv->ssl, data_index, client); +#ifdef SSL_CTRL_SET_TLSEXT_HOSTNAME + if (hostname) + SSL_set_tlsext_host_name (priv->ssl, hostname); +#endif + SSL_set_connect_state (priv->ssl); if (!g_tls_client_connection_openssl_parent_initable_iface->
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #149
Posted 28 March 2017 - 22:40
Yes, this patch looks exactly as it should.
I use this TLS backed with this two patches since at least three months.
And everything works just like it should. I do not have any further problems.
But, first of all OpenSSL is much, much faster than GnuTLS.
Regards,
SSS
Edited by samsamsam, 28 March 2017 - 22:44.
Re: full ci+ support #150
Posted 29 March 2017 - 11:06
Guys, may I just say
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: full ci+ support #151
Posted 29 March 2017 - 20:22
Both patches reported upstream, so others user will benefit as well. Until then patches added in recipe in master-next.
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #152
Posted 29 March 2017 - 20:32
Merged. I assume you keep an eye on upstream?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: full ci+ support #153
Re: full ci+ support #154
Re: full ci+ support #155
Posted 7 April 2017 - 16:43
The slot works.
If you mean if a CI+ module works in CI+ mode in that slot, the answer is no. Not until someone creates a generic solution that doesn't violate any legal constraints (i.e. doesn't contain a CI+ certificate, either as file or obscured in a binary).
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: full ci+ support #156
Posted 7 April 2017 - 17:16
Merged. I assume you keep an eye on upstream?
Upstream patches commited, will update to new tag later today.
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #157
Posted 7 April 2017 - 20:52
PR: https://github.com/O...e-core/pull/199
Edited by athoik, 7 April 2017 - 20:53.
Unamed: 13E Quattro - 9E Quattro on IKUSI MS-0916
Re: full ci+ support #158
Posted 7 April 2017 - 21:05
Merged.
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
Re: full ci+ support #159
Re: full ci+ support #160
Posted 7 April 2017 - 21:38
Now if we could go back to the original topic and fix that too?
Currently in use: VU+ Duo 4K (2xFBC S2), VU+ Solo 4K (1xFBC S2), uClan Usytm 4K Ultimate (S2+T2), Octagon SF8008 (S2+T2), Zgemma H9.2H (S2+T2)
Due to my bad health, I will not be very active at times and may be slow to respond. I will not read the forum or PM on a regular basis.
Many answers to your question can be found in our new and improved wiki.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users